Conflict between the sexes and cooperation within a sex can alter classic predictions of mating systems theory

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 145-156

  Alonzo, Suzanne H ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Game theory; Ideal free distribution; Mating system; Reproductive strategies; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846837369     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alonzo, S.H. and Sinervo, B. 2001. Mate choice games, context-dependent good genes, and genetic cycles in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 49: 176-186.
2. Alonzo, S.H. and Warner, R.R. 2000a. Dynamic games and field experiments examining intra- and inter-sexual conflict: explaining counterintuitive mating behavior in a Mediterranean wrasse, Symphodus ocellatus. Behav. Ecol., 11: 56-70.
3. Alonzo, S.H. and Warner, R.R. 2000b. Female choice, conflict between the sexes and the evolution of male alternative reproductive behaviours. Evol. Ecol. Res., 2: 149-170.
4. Andersson, M. and Iwasa, Y. 1996. Sexual selection. TREE, 11: 53-58.
5. Arnqvist, G. and Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Candolin, U. and Reynolds, J.D. 2001. Sexual signaling in the European bitterling: females learn the truth by direct inspection of the resource. Behav. Ecol., 12: 407-411.
7. Chapman, T. and Patridge, L. 1996. Sexual conflict as fuel for evolution. Nature, 381: 189-190.
8. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. and Rowe, L. 2003. Sexual conflict. TREE, 18: 41-47.
9. Davies, N.B. 1992. Dunnock Behaviour and Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Dominey, W.J. 1981. Maintenance of female mimicry as a reproductive strategy in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Environ. Biol. Fish, 6: 59-64.
11. Emlen, S.T. and Oring, L.W. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197: 215-223.
12. Fretwell, S.D. 1972. Populations in a Seasonal Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Gavrilets, S. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature, 403: 886-889.
14. Hardling, R. and Kaitala, A. 2005. The evolution of repeated mating under sexual conflict. J. Evol. Biol., 18: 106-115.
15. Holland, B. and Rice, W.R. 1998. Perspective: Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution, 52: 1-7.
16. Hugie, D.M. and Lank, D.B. 1997. The resident's dilemma: a female choice model for the evolution of alternative mating strategies in lekking male ruffs (Philomachus pugnax). Behav. Ecol., 8: 218-225.
17. Lessells, C.M. 1995. Putting resource dynamics into continuous input ideal free distribution models. Anim. Behav., 49: 487-494.
18. Lessells, C.M. 2006. The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 361: 301-317.
19. Parker, G.A. 1998. Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T.R. Birkhead and A.P. Møller, eds.), pp. 3-54. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Rice, W.R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature, 381: 232-234.
21. Shuster, S.M. and Wade, M.J. 2003. Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Sih, A. 1998. Game theory and predator-prey response races. In Game Theory and Animal Behavior (L.A. Dugatkin and H.K. Reeve, eds.), pp. 221-238. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Wedell, N., Kvarnemo, C., Lessells, C.K.M. and Tregenza, T. 2006. Sexual conflict and life histories. Anim. Behav., 71: 999-1011.