Epidural space identification: A meta-analysis of complications after air versus liquid as the medium for loss of resistance

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 109, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 2012-2021

  Schier, Robert ^a   Guerra, Diana ^b   Aguilar, Jorge ^b   Pratt, Gregory F ^b   Hernandez, Mike ^b   Boddu, Krishna ^b   Riedel, Bernhard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; AIR; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; ARTICLE; ATTRIBUTABLE RISK; CATHETERIZATION; CHRONIC PAIN; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DURA MATER; EMBASE; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; EPIDURAL SPACE; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER; LIQUID; MEDLINE; NERVE BLOCK; PARESTHESIA; POSTDURAL PUNCTURE HEADACHE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNCTURE;

EID: 73949111034     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bc113a     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Shenouda PE, Cunningham BJ. Assessing the superiority of saline versus air for use in the epidural loss of resistance technique: a literature review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28:48-53
2. Howell TK, Prosser DP, Harmer M. A change in resistance? A survey of epidural practice amongst obstetric anaesthetists. Anaesthesia 1998;53:238-243
3. Sicard A. [Examination of the epidural space with lipiodol in the diagnosis of lumbosciatica]. Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 1950;76: 596-597
4. Cowan CM, Moore EW. A survey of epidural technique and accidental dural puncture rates among obstetric anaesthetists. Int J Obstet Anesth 2001;10:11-16
5. Wantman A, Hancox N, Howell PR. Techniques for identifying the epidural space: a survey of practice amongst anaesthetists in the UK. Anaesthesia 2006;61:370-375
6. Valentine SJ, Jarvis AP, Shutt LE. Comparative study of the effects of air or saline to identify the extradural space. Br J Anaesth 1991;66:224-227
7. Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD. Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004;13:227-233
8. Portnoy D, Vadhera RB. Mechanisms and management of an incomplete epidural block for cesarean section. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2003;21:39-57
9. Ducrow M. The occurrence of unblocked segments during continuous lumbar epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Br J Anaesth 1971;43:1172-1174
10. Evron S, Sessler D, Sadan O, Boaz M, Glezerman M, Ezri T. Identification of the epidural space: loss of resistance with air, lidocaine, or the combination of air and lidocaine. Anesth Analg 2004;99:245-250
11. Sarna MC, Smith I, James JM. Paraesthesia with lumbar epidural catheters. A comparison of air and saline in a loss-ofresistance technique. Anaesthesia 1990;45:1077-1079
12. Eappen S, Blinn A, Segal S. Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: a retrospective chart review. Int J Obstet Anesth 1998;7:220-225
13. Tanaka K, Watanabe R, Harada T, Dan K. Extensive application of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in a university hospital: incidence of complications related to technique. Reg Anesth 1993;18:34-38
14. Withington DE, Weeks SK. Repeat epidural analgesia and unilateral block. Can J Anaesth 1994;41:568-571
15. Aida S, Taga K, Yamakura T, Endoh H, Shimoji K. Headache after attempted epidural block: the role of intrathecal air. Anesthesiology 1998;88:76-81
16. Beilin Y, Arnold I, Telfeyan C, Bernstein HH, Hossain S. Quality of analgesia when air versus saline is used for identification of the epidural space in the parturient. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000;25:596-599
17. Norman D, Winkelman C, Hanrahan E, Hood R, Nance B. Labor epidural anesthetics comparing loss of resistance with air versus saline: does the choice matter? AANA J 2006;74:301-308
18. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354:1896-1900
19. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:377-384
20. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188
21. Hardy RJ, Thompson SG. Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med 1998;17:841-856
22. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560
23. Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, Russell Localio A. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of metaanalytical methods with rare events. Stat Med 2007;26:53-77
24. Roelants F, Veyckemans F, Van Obbergh L, Singelyn F, Waterloos H, Gouverneur JM, Gribomont BF. Loss of resistance to saline with a bubble of air to identify the epidural space in infants and children: a prospective study. Anesth Analg 2000;90:59-61
25. Talwar V, Tyagi R, Mullick P, Gogia AR. Comparison of 'whoosh' and modified 'swoosh' test for identification of the caudal epidural space in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2006;16:134-139
26. Philip BK. Relative risks of epidural air injection in children and adults. Anesth Analg 1988;67:600-601
27. Verniquet AJ. Vessel puncture with epidural catheters. Experience in obstetric patients. Anaesthesia 1980;35:660-662
28. Leighton BL, Gross JB. Air: an effective indicator of intravenously located epidural catheters. Anesthesiology 1989;71:848-851
29. Lin BC, Chen KB, Chang CS, Wu KC, Liu YC, Chen CC, Wu RS. A 'membrane in syringe' technique that allows identification of the epidural space with saline while avoids injection of air into the epidural space. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 2002;40:55-60
30. Candido KD, Winnie AP. A dual-chambered syringe that allows identification of the epidural space using the loss of resistance technique with air and with saline. Reg Anesth 1992;17:163-165
31. Iwama H. Injection volume of saline with loss of resistance method may affect the spread of epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997;86:507-508
32. Doughty A. Epidural analgesia in labour: the past, the present and the future. J R Soc Med 1978;71:879-884
33. Scott DB. Identification of the epidural space: loss of resistance to air or saline? Reg Anesth 1997;22:1-2
34. Wheatley RG, Schug SA, Watson D. Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2001;87:47-61
35. Gleeson CM, Reynolds F. Accidental dural puncture rates in UK obstetric practice. Int J Obstet Anesth 1998;7:242-246
36. Kennedy TM, Ullman DA, Harte FA, Saberski LR, Greenhouse BB. Lumbar root compression secondary to epidural air. Anesth Analg 1988;67:1184-1186
37. Stride PC, Cooper GM. Dural taps revisited. A 20-year survey from Birmingham Maternity Hospital. Anaesthesia 1993;48:247-255
38. Okell RW, Sprigge JS. Unintentional dural puncture. A survey of recognition and management. Anaesthesia 1987;42:1110-1113
39. Giebler RM, Scherer RU, Peters J. Incidence of neurologic complications related to thoracic epidural catheterization. Anesthesiology 1997;86:55-63
40. Miguel R, Morse S, Murtagh R. Epidural air associated with multiradicular syndrome. Anesth Analg 1991;73:92-94
41. Dalens B, Bazin JE, Haberer JP. Epidural bubbles as a cause of incomplete analgesia during epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1987;66:679-683
42. Saberski LR, Kondamuri S, Osinubi OY. Identification of the epidural space: is loss of resistance to air a safe technique? A review of the complications related to the use of air. Reg Anesth 1997;22:3-15