The snowbird charrette: Integrative interdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research design

Minerva

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 407-440

  Hackett, Edward J ^a   Rhoten, Diana R ^b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United States)

Author keywords

Experiment; Graduate education; IGERT; Research; Science policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 73949089926     PISSN: 00264695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11024-009-9136-0     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Abt Associates. 2006. Contractor annual report and summary of the cross-site monitoring of the NSF integrative graduate education and research traineeship (IGERT) program. Final Report. Cambridge.
3. Barry, A., G. Born, and G. Weszkalnys. 2008. Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society 37(1): 20-49.
4. Bement, Arden. 2005. Speech to the AAAS Spring R& D symposium. Washington, DC.
5. Ben-David, Joseph, and Randall Collins. 1966. Social factors in the origins of a new science: The case of psychology. American Sociological Review 31: 451-465.
6. Bird, E. 2001. Disciplining the interdisciplinary: radicalism and the academic curriculum. British Journal of Sociology of Education 22(4): 463-478.
7. Boix Mansilla, Veronica, and Elizabeth Dawes Duraising. 2007. Targeted assessment of students' interdisciplinary work. The Journal of Higher Education 78(2): 215-237.
8. Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
9. Clarke, Adele. 1998. Disciplining reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. Daily, Gretchen (ed.). 1997. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, D. C.: Island Press.
11. European Union Research Advisory Board. 2004. Interdisciplinary research. Brussels: European Union. (EURAB 04. 009-FINAL).
12. Evans, Robert, and Harry Collins. 2008. Expertise: From attribute to attribution and back again? In The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd ed, eds. Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael E. Lynch, and Judy Wajcman. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Freedman, David, Robert Pisani, Roger Purves, and Ani Adhikari. 1991. Statistics, 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton.
14. Frickel, Scott, and Neal Gross. 2005. A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. American Sociological Review 70: 204-232.
15. Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1993. The emergence of post-normal science. In Science, politics, and morality: Scientific uncertainty and decision making, ed. René von Schomberg, 85-123. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.
17. Gillispie, Charles Coulston. 1960. The edge of objectivity: An essay in the history of scientific ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18. Grant, Gerald and David Riesman. 1978. The perpetual dream: Reform and experiment in the American college. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Hackett, Edward J. 2005. Essential tensions. Social Studies of Science 35(5): 787-826.
20. Hackett, Edward J., John N. Parker, David Conz, Diana R. Rhoten, and Andrew Parker. 2008. Ecology transformed: The National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis and the changing patterns of ecological research. In Scientific collaboration on the internet, eds. Gary M. Olson, Ann S. Zimmerman, and Nathan Bos, 277-296. Cambridge: MIT.
21. Hansson, B. 1999. Interdisciplinarity: for what purpose? Policy Sciences 32: 339-343.
22. Hatano, Giyoo and Kayoko Inagaki. 1986. Two courses of expertise. In Child development and education in Japan, eds. Harold Stevenson, Hiroshi Azuma, and Kenji Hakuta, 262-272. New York: W. H. Freeman. Available online http://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2115/25206/1/6_P27-36.pdf.
23. Jacobs, Jerry A., and Scott Frickel. 2009. Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 35: 43-65.
24. Jencks, Christopher and David Riesman. 1968. The academic revolution. New York: Doubleday.
25. Kavaloski, V. 1979. Interdisciplinary education and humanistic aspiration: A critical reflection. In Interdisciplinarity and higher education, ed. J. J. Kockelmans. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
26. Klein, J. T. 2000. A conceptual vocabulary of interdisciplinary science. In Practising interdisciplinarity, eds. P. Weingart, and N. Stehr. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
27. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic cultures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
28. Ladd, Everett Carll, Jr. and Seymour Martin Lipset. 1975. The divided academy: Professors and politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1972. Passion and politics: The dimensions of student involvement. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
30. Martin, P. E., and B. R. Umberger. 2003. Trends in interdisciplinary and integrative graduate training: An NSF IGERT example. Quest-Illinois-National Association for Physical Education in Higher Education 55: 86-94.
31. Milgram, Stanley. 1969. Obedience to authority. New York: Harper and Row.
32. Mullins, Nicholas. 1972. The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva 10: 51-82.
33. National Research Council. 2004. Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34. National Science Board. 2007. Enhancing support of transformative research at the national science foundation. Arlington: National Science Board.
35. National Science Foundation. 2002. Integrative graduate education and research traineeship (IGERT) program (NSF 02-145). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. URL: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2002/nsf02145/nsf02145.htm#TOC. Accessed 13 June 2008.
36. Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2003. Introduction: 'Mode 2' revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva 41: 179-194.
37. Pielke Jr., Roger A. 2007. The honest broker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Rhoten, Diana R. 2004. Interdisciplinary research: Trend or transition? Items & Issues 5(1): 6-11. (article reprinted in Queste Istituzione 2008).
39. Rhoten, Diana R., and Andrew Parker. 2005. Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary path. Science 306: 2046. (December 17).
40. Rhoten, Diana R., and Stephanie Pfirman. 2007. Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy 36(1): 56-75.
41. Rhoten, Diana R., Erin O'Connor, and Edward J. Hackett. 2008. The act of collaborative creation and the art of integrative creativity: Originality, disciplinarity, and interdisciplinarity. Thesis Eleven 96: 83-108.
42. Roy, Rustum. 1979. Interdisciplinary science on campus: That elusive dream. In Interdisciplinarity and higher education, ed. J. J. Kocklemans. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
43. Salter, L., and A. Hearn. 1996. Outside the lines: Issues in interdisciplinary research. Montreal: McGill-Queen's Press.
44. Schwartz, D. L., J. D. Bransford, and D. A. Sears. 2005. Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective, ed. J. Mestre, 1-52. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
45. Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19: 387-420.
46. Stokes, Donald. 1997. Pasteur's quadrant. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
47. Wake, M. 2008. Integrative biology: Science for the 21st century. BioScience 58(4): 349-353.
48. Weingart, Peter, and Nico Stehr (eds.). 2000. Practising interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.