Textpresso site-specific recombinases: A text-mining server for the recombinase literature including Cre mice and conditional alleles

Genesis

Volumn 47, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 842-846

  Urbanski, William M ^a,b   Condie, Brian G ^a  

^a University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bxb1; Cre; Cre mouse database; Flp; PhiC31; Site specific recombinase

Indexed keywords

CRE RECOMBINASE;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CONDITIONAL ALLELE; DATA MINING; GENE ACTIVATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOUSE STRAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; TRANSGENE;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DNA NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASES; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTEGRASES; INTERNET; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MICE, TRANSGENIC; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

DANIO RERIO; MUS;

EID: 73649121605     PISSN: 1526954X     EISSN: 1526968X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvg.20575     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Branda CS, Dymecki SM. 2004. Talking about a revolution: The impact of site-specific recombinases on genetic analyses in mice. Dev Cell 6:7-28.
2. Calos MP. 2006. The phiC31 integrase system for gene therapy. Curr Gene Ther 6:633-645.
3. Furuta Y, Behringer RR. 2005. Recent innovations in tissue-specific gene modifications in the mouse. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 75:43-57.
4. García-Otín AL, Guillou F. 2006. Mammalian genome targeting using sitespecific recombinases. Front Biosci 11:1108-1136.
5. Gilbertson L. 2003. Cre-lox recombination: Cre-ative tools for plant biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 21:550-555.
6. Hadjantonakis AK, Pirity M, Nagy. 2008. Cre recombinase mediated alterations of the mouse genome using embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol 461:111-132.
7. Khan MS, Khalid AM, Malik KA. 2005. Phage phiC31 integrase: A new tool in plastid genome engineering. Trends Plant Sci 10:1-3.
8. Kim JC, Dymecki SM. 2009. Genetic fate-mapping approaches: New means to explore the embryonic origins of the cochlear nucleus. Methods Mol Biol 493:65-85.
9. Lee T, Luo L. 2001. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) for Drosophila neural development. Trends Neurosci 24:251-254.
10. Lewandoski M. 2007. Analysis of mouse development with conditional mutagenesis. Handbook Exp Pharmacol 178:235-262.
11. Marsischky G, Labaer J. 2004. Many paths to many clones: A comparative look at high-throughput cloning methods. Genome Res 14:2020-2028.
12. McGuire SE, Roman G, Davis RL. 2004. Gene expression systems in Drosophila: A synthesis of time and space. Trends Genet 20:384-391.
13. Mills AA, Bradley A. 2001. From mouse to man: Generating megabase chromosome rearrangements. Trends Genet 17:331-339.
14. Müller HM, Kenny EE, Sternberg PW. 2004, Textpresso: An ontology-based information retrieval and extraction system for biological literature. PLoS Biol 2:e309.
15. Nagy A, Perrimon N, Sandmeyer S, Plasterk R. 2003. Tailoring the genome: The power of genetic approaches. Nat Genet 33(Suppl): 276-284.
16. Ow DW. 2002. Recombinase-directed plant transformation for the postgenomic era. Plant Mol Biol 48:183-200.
17. Ow DW. 2007. GM maize from site-specific recombination technology, what next? Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:115-120.
18. Venken KJ, Bellen HJ. 2005. Emerging technologies for gene manipulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Rev Genet 6:167-178.
19. Venken KJ, Bellen HJ. 2007. Transgenesis upgrades for Drosophila melanogaster. Development 134:3571-3584.