The intellectual property rights regime and the changing structure of scientific research in India: Lessons from the developing world

Perspectives on Global Development and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 628-654

  Mallick, Sambit ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GUWAHATI   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING WORLD; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; POST-COLONIALISM; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;

INDIA;

EID: 73549124317     PISSN: 15691500     EISSN: 15691497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156915009X12583611836172     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Albuquerque E. and A. Bernandes. 2003. "Cross-over, Thresholds and Interactions between Science and Technology: A Tentative Simplified Model and Initial Notes about Statistics from 120 Countries." Research Policy 32(5):865-885.
2. Bancomext. 2000. "The Pharmaceutical Industry in Mexico." Retrieved January 4, 2005 (http:// mexico.businessline.gob.mx/espa/sectorial-i/ farmaceutica-ingles.html).
3. Bubert I. and M. Buning. 2001. "Trademark Law: Domain Name Issues." In E-commerce Law and Practice in Europe, I. Walden and J. Hornle (Eds). Woodhead, loose-leaf.
4. Bystrom M., P. Einarsson, and G. Nycander. 1999. "Fair and Equitable: Sharing the Benefi ts from Use of Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge." Swedish Scientific Council on Biological Diversity.
5. Chakravarthi, R. 1999. IPRs, Genes, and Life-patenting. South-North Development Monitor. Retrieved February 12, 2008 (http://www.biotech-info.net/ IPRs-genes.html).
6. Correa, C. 1996. "Uruguay Round and Drugs." WHO Task Force on HealTheconomics/Action Program on Essential Drugs, Geneva.
7. -- 2000. "Implementing National Public Health Policies in the Framework of WTO Agreements." World Health Organization. Retrieved February 26, 2008 (http://www.cct-freiburg .de/who/global/documents/ implementingatpubhlthpol.pdf ).
8. Dasgupta, P. and P.A. David. 1994. "Toward a New Economics of Science." Research Policy 23(5):487-521.
9. Davenport, S. and D. Bibby. 1999. "Rethinking a National Innovation System: The Small Country as 'SME'." Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 11(3):431-462.
10. David, P.A. 2000. "A Tragedy of the Public Knowledge 'Commons'? Global Science, Intellectual Property and the Digital Technology Boomerang." Electronic Journal of Intellectual Property Rights. Retrieved May 2, 2008 (http://siepr.stanford.edu/papers/pdf/00-02.html).
11. Forero-Pineda, C. 1997. "Convergence of Research Processes, Big and Small Scientific Communities." IIASA Workshop, Laxenburg, Austria, May.
12. -- 2004. "Scientific Research, Information Flows, and the Impact of Database Protection in Developing Countries." In Open Access and the Public Domain in Digital Data and Information for Science, J. Esanu and P. Uhlir (Eds). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13. -- 2006. "The Impact of Stronger Intellectual Property Rights on Science and Technology in Developing Countries." Research Policy 35(6):808-824.
14. Government of India. 2004. Data Book. Department of Science and Technology.
15. -- 2005. Directory to Research and Development in Sociology and Social Anthropology. Department of Science and Technology.
16. Haribabu, E. 1999. "Scientific Knowledge in India: From Public Resource to Intellectual Property." Sociological Bulletin 48(1-2):217-233.
17. Jaffe, A.B. 2000. "The US Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process." Research Policy 29(4-5):531-557.
18. Jairath, V.K. 1984. "In Search of Roots-The Indian Scientific Community." Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.) 18(1):109-130.
19. Jaramillo, H., C. Latorre, and J.M. Restrepo. 2004. "Mercado de medicamentos, regulacion y politicas publicas." Working Paper # 34, Facultad de Economia, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota.
20. Jasanoff , S. 2007 [2005]. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
21. Khor, M. 2001. "The Proposed New Issues in the WTO and the Interests of Developing Countries." Th ird World Network. Retrieved May 2, 2008 (www.twnside.org.sg/title/mk10.htm).
22. Kuhn, T.S. 1970 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.
23. Lanjouw, J. 1998. "The Introduction of Pharmaceutical Product Patents in India: Heartless Exploitation of the Poor and Suff ering." National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper Series No. 6366, Cambridge.
24. Lerner, J. 1994. "The Importance of Trade Secrecy: Evidence from Civil Litigation." Harvard University Working Paper, November.
25. Lopez, A. 2002. "El Impacto de la Protection de las Bases de Datos no Originales Sobre los Paises de America Latina el Caribe." WIPO Working Paper, November 4-8, Geneva.
26. Mallick, S. 2006. "Democratizing Scientific Knowledge through Building Scientific Institutions in Nineteenth Century India: The Sociology of Science Perspective." Current Science 90(8):1138-1145.
27. Mallick, S. and E. Haribabu. 2010. "The Intellectual Property Rights Regime and Emerging Institutional Framework of Scientific Research: Response of the Plant Molecular Biologists in India." Asian Journal of Social Science 38(1), forthcoming.
28. Mallick, S., E. Haribabu, and S.G. Kulkarni. 2005. "Debates on Science and Technology in India: Alliance Formation between Scientific and Political Elite during the Inter-war Period." Social Scientist 33(11-12):49-75.
29. Merton, R.K. 1973 [1942]. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Ministere de la Recherche. 2000. "La Loi sur I'Innovation et la Recherche. Republique Francaise." Retrieved May 2, 2008 (http://www.recherche.gouv.fr/technologie/mesur/loi/inovloi .htm).
31. Mossinghoff , G. 1999. "Progress in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Introduction to Intellectual Property Rights." US Department of State, International Information Programs, October. Retrieved December 21, 2000 (http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/intelprp/progress.htm).
32. National Academy of Sciences. 1997. Intellectual Property Rights and the Dissemination of Research Tools in Molecular Biology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33. Owen-Smith, J.D. 2005. "Dockets, Deals, and Sagas: Commensuration and the Rationalization of Experience in University Licensing." Social Studies of Science 35(1):69-97.
34. Rautiainen, T. 2001. "Appendix 1: What Is the Bayh-Dole Act, What Prompted It and Why Is It Important to University Technology Transfer." Pharmaceutical Business in California. Retrieved February 26, 2008 (http://www.tekes.fi /julkaisut/biopharma/appendix.1.htm).
35. Sampat, B.N. 2006. "Patenting and US Academic Research in the Twentieth Century: The World before and after Bayh-Dole." Research Policy 35(6):772-789.
36. Shiva, V. and J. Bandopadhyay. 1980. "The Large and Fragile Community of Scientists in India." Minerva 18(4):575-594.
37. Watson, J.D. and F.H.C. Crick. 1953. "Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids-A Structure of Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid." Nature 171(4356):737-738.
38. World Health Organization and World Trade Organization. 2001. "Report of the Workshop on Diff erential Pricing and Financing of Essential Drugs." Hosbjorg, Norway, April.
39. Zerda-Sarmiento, A. and C. Forero-Pineda. 2002. "Intellectual Property Rights over Ethnic Communities' Knowledge." International Social Science Journal 54(1):99-114.