The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire-Revised (SMQ-R): Validation and psychometric testing

Accountability in Research

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 263-280

  Broome, Marion E ^a   Pryor, Erica ^b   Habermann, Barbara ^b   Pulley, Leavonne ^c   Kincaid, Harold ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Research integrity; Scientific misconduct

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERSONNEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STANDARD;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ATTITUDE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 33748068143     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989620500440253     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science-AAAS. (1992), Scientific ethics and responsibility.Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press, 1992. K. Markey,Research manager.
2. Association for Clinical Research Professionals (2001). Last accessed October 11, 2005. Available at www.acrpnet.org.
3. Broome, M., Habermann, B., Pryor, E., Kincaid, H., Pulley, L., and Jester, P., (2003). Scientific Misconduct: The Role of the Research Coordinator (1 RO1 NR00008802). National Institute for Nursing Research N.I.H. 2003-2005.
4. Cronbach, L. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psy-chometrika, 16: 297-334.
5. Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments (2002). Integrity in scientific research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine National Academies Press.
6. Federman, D., Hanna, K., and Rodriguez, L. (2003). Responsible Research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine National Academies Press.
7. Gaddis, B., Helton-Fauth, W., Scott, G., Shaffer, A., Connelly, S., and Mumford, M. (2003). Development of two measures of climate for scientific organizations, Accountability in Research, 10: 253-288.
8. Glick, L.J., and Shamoo, A.E.Results of a questionnaire on research practices, completed by attendees at the Third Conference on Research Policies and Quality Assurance, Accountability in Research, 1994, 3(4): 275-280.
9. Hals, A., and Jacobsen, G. (1993). Dishonesty in medical research: A questionnaire study among project administrators in Health Region 4, Tidsskrift for den Norske Loegeforeninjg, 113(25): 3149-3152.
10. Hatcher, L., and Stepanski, E. J., 1994 A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
11. Jones, R.Research misconduct,Family Practice, 2002, 19(2): 123-124.
12. LaFollette, M.Research Misconduct, Society, March/April 1994,: 6-10.
13. Lancet (2002). The next step: Ensuring integrity of scientific research, Lancet, 360: 9332-9499.
14. McCabe, D.L. (1992). The influence of situational ethics among college students, Sociological Inquiry, 62(3): 366-374.
15. Office of Research Integrity. (2001). Last accessed on October 11, 2005.Available at www.ori.gov.
16. Office of Research Integrity. (2005) Final Rule on Research Misconduct. Last accessed August 19, 2005.Available at www.ori.dhhs.gov/policies.
17. Rankin, M., and Esteves, M.,Perceptions of scientific misconduct in nursing, Nursing Research, 1997, 46(5): 270-276.
18. Resnick, D.Data falsification in clinical trials, Science Communication,1996, 18: 49-58.
19. Riis, P. Scientific dishonesty: European reflections, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2001, 54: 4-6.
20. SAS Institute. (2005). SAS OnlineDoc 9.1.3.Available at http:/ /www.sas.com/ service/library/onlinedoc.
21. Sheehan, K.H., Sheehan, D.V., and White,(1990). A pilot study of medical student 'abuse'. Student perceptions of mistreatment and misconduct in medical school, Journal of the American Medical Association, 263(4): 533-537.
22. Steneck, N. (2000). Report of the November ORI conference on research integrity. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
23. nd ed. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
24. Waltz, C., Strickland, O., and Lenz, E., Measurement in nursing research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis, 1991.
25. Weed, D. (1998). Preventing scientific misconduct, American Journal of Public Health, 88(1): 125-129.
26. Wilmhurst, P.The code of silence, Lancet, 1997, 349: 567-569.