Generating experimental designs involving controland noise variables using genetic algorithms

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1045-1065

  Rodriguez, Myrta ^a   Montgomery, Douglas C ^b   Borror, Connie M ^b  

^a SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES   (Mexico)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alphabetic optimality; Fraction of design space plots; Genetic algorithms; Prediction variance; Robust design

Indexed keywords

DESIGN SPACES; DESIRABILITY FUNCTION; EFFICIENT ESTIMATION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FRACTION OF DESIGN SPACE PLOTS; NEW DESIGN; NOISE VARIABLES; OPTIMALITY; PREDICTION VARIANCE; ROBUST DESIGNS; SIMULTANEOUS OPTIMIZATION;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICS;

DESIGN;

EID: 73449147669     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.1020     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Taguchi G, Wu Y. Introduction to Off-line Quality Control. Central Japan Quality Control Association, available from the American Supplier Institute, MI, 1985.
2. Lucas JM. How to achieve a robust process using response surface methodology. Journal of Quality Technology 1994; 26:248-260.
3. Khattree R. Robust parameter design: A response surface approach. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28:187-198.
4. Kim K, Lin DKJ. Dual response surface optimization: A fuzzy modeling approach. Journal of Quality Technology 1998; 30(1):1-10.
5. Koksoy O, Doganaksoy N. Joint optimization of mean and standard deviation using response surface methods. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 35(3):239-252.
6. Miŕo-Quesada G, Del Castillo E. Two approaches for improving the dual response method in robust parameter design. Journal of Quality Technology 2004; 36(2):154-168.
7. Montgomery DC. Experimental design for product and process design and development (with commentary). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D 1999; 48:159-177.
8. Myers WR, Brenneman WA, Myers RH. A dual-response approach to robust parameter design for a generalized linear model. Journal of Quality Technology 2005; 37(2):130-138.
9. Myers RH, Carter WH Jr. Response surface techniques for dual response systems. Technometrics 1973; 15(2):301-317.
10. Myers RH, Khuri AI, Vining G. Response surface alternatives to the Taguchi robust parameter design approach. The American Statistician 1992; 46:131-139.
11. Tang LC, Xu K. A unified approach for dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 2002; 34(4):437-447.
12. Vining GG, Myers RH. Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology 1990; 22:38-45.
13. Vining G, Schaub D. Experimental designs for estimating both mean and variance functions. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28(2):135-147.
14. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. Wiley: New York, NY, 2002.
15. Box GEP, Hunter JS. Multi-factor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1957; 28:195-241.
16. Kiefer J. Optimum experimental designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1959; 21:272-319.
17. Borror CM, Montgomery DC, Myers RH. Evaluation of statistical designs for experiments involving noise variables. Journal of Quality Technology 2002; 34:54-70.
18. Harrington EC. The desirability function. Industrial Quality Control 1965; 21:494-498.
19. Derringer G, Suich R. Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology 1980; 12:214-219.
20. Bäck T. Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York, NY, 1996.
21. Hamada M, Martz HE, Reese CS, Wilson AG. Finding near-optimal Bayesian experimental designs via genetic algorithms. The American Statistician 2001; 55:175-181.
22. Heredia-Langner A, Carlyle WM, Montogomery DC, Borror CM, Runger GC. Genetic algorithms for the construction of D-optimal designs. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 35:28-46.
23. Ortiz F Jr, Simpson JR, Pignatiello JJ Jr, Heredia-Langner A. A genetic algorithm approach to multiple-response optimization. Journal of Quality Technology 2004; 36:432-450.
24. Heredia-Langner A, Montgomery DC, Carlyle WM, Borror CM. Model-robust optimal designs: A genetic algorithm approach. Journal of Quality Technology 2004; 36:263-279.
25. Park Y, Richardson DE, Montgomery DC, Ozol-Godfrey A, Borror CM, Anderson-Cook CM. Prediction variance properties of second-order designs for cuboidal regions. Journal of Quality Technology 2005; 37:253-266.
26. Goldfarb HB, Borror CM, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Using genetic algorithms to generate mixture-process experimental designs involving control and noise variables. Journal of Quality Technology 2005; 37:60-74.
27. Chung PJ, Goldfarb HB, Montgomery DC. Optimal designs for mixture-process experiments with control and noise variables. Journal of Quality Technology 2007; 39(3):179-190.
28. Zahran A, Anderson-Cook CM, Myers RH. Fraction of design space to assess prediction capability of response surface designs. Journal of Quality Technology 2003; 35:377-386.