United but divided: Welfare regimes and the level and variance in public support for redistribution

European Sociological Review

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 723-737

  Jæger, Mads Meier ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73449132259     PISSN: 02667215     EISSN: 14682672     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcn079     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Alvarez, R. M. and Brehm, J. (1995). American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1055-1089.
2. Alvarez, R. M. and Brehm, J. (1998). Speaking in Two Voices: American Equivocation About the Internal Revenue Service. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 418-452.
3. Andress, H.-J. and Heien, T. (2001). Four Worlds of Welfare Attitudes? A Comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review, 17, 337-356.
4. Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. (2001). Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter? Acta Sociologica, 44, 284-299.
5. Arts, W. and Gelissen, J. (2002). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? A State-of-the-Art Report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 137-158.
6. Bean, C. and Papadakis, E. (1998). A Comparison of Mass Attitudes Towards the Welfare State in Different Institutional Regimes, 1985-1990. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10, 211-236.
7. Blekesaune, M. (2007). Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies. European Sociological Review, 23, 393-403.
8. Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003). Public Attitudes Toward Welfare State Policies: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations. European Sociological Review, 19, 415-427.
9. Blomberg, H. and Kroll, C. (1999). Do Structural Contexts Matter? Macro-sociological Factors and Popular Attitudes towards Public Welfare Services. Acta Sociologica, 42, 319-335.
10. Brady, D. (2003). The Politics of Poverty: Left Political Institutions, the Welfare State, and Poverty. Social Forces, 82, 557-588.
11. Brooks, C. and Manza, J. (2006). Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies. American Sociological Review, 71, 474-494.
12. Coughlin, R. (1980). Ideology, Public Opinion, Welfare Policy: Attitudes Towards Taxing and Spending in Industrialized Countries. Berkeley, CA: Institution of International Studies.
13. Derks, A. (2004). Are the Underprivileged Really that Economic 'Leftist'? Attitudes Towards Economic Redistribution and the Welfare State in Flanders. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 509-520.
14. Edlund, J. (1999). Trust in Government and Welfare Regimes: Attitudes to Redistribution and Financial Cheating in the USA and Norway. European Journal of Political Research, 35, 341-370.
15. Edlund, J. (2003). The Influence of the Class Situations of Husband and Wives on Class Identity, Party Preference and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: Sweden, Germany and the United States. Acta Sociologica, 46, 195-214.
16. Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The Constant Flux. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Evans, G. (1996). Cross-National Differences in Support for Welfare and Redistribution: An Evaluation of Competing Theories. In Taylor, B. and Thomson, K. (Eds.), Understanding Changes in Social Attitudes. Aldershot: Dartmouth, pp. 185-208.
20. Fraile, M. and Ferrer, M. (2005). Explaining the Determinants of Public Support for Cuts in Unemployment Benefits Spending Across OECD Countries. International Sociology, 20, 459-481.
21. Gelissen, J. (2000). Popular Support for Institutionalized Solidarity: A Comparison between European Welfare States. International Journal of Social Welfare, 9, 285-300.
22. Goodin, R. E., Headey, B., Muffels, R. and Dirven, H.-J. (1999). The Real Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hall, P. (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. . Huber, E., Ragin C., Stephens, J. D., Brady D. and Beckfield, J. (2004). Comparative Welfare States Data Set. Northwestern University: University of North Carolina, Duke University and Indiana University.
25. Jæger, M. M. (2006). Welfare Regimes and Attitudes Towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited. European Sociological Review, 22, 157-170.
26. Kaase, M. and Newton, K. (1998). What People Expect from the State: Plus ca Change. In Jowell, R. et al. (Eds.) British-and European Social Attitudes-the 15th Report. How Britain Differs. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 39-56.
27. Kenworthy, L. (2003). Quantitative Indicators of Corporatism. International Journal of Sociology, 33, 10-44.
28. Korpi, W. (1989). Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship: Social Rights During Sickness in Eighteen OECD Countries Since 1930. American Sociological Review, 54, 309-328.
29. Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (1998). The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries. American Sociological Review, 63, 661-687.
30. Larsen, C. A. (2008). The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 145-168.
31. Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent Structure Analysis. Boston: Houghton Mill.
32. Lee, Y.-J. and Ku, Y.-W. (2007). East Asian Welfare Regimes: Testing the Hypothesis of the Developmental Welfare State. Social Policy and Administration, 41, 197-212.
33. Linos, K. and West, M. (2003). Self-interest, Social Beliefs, and Attitudes to Redistribution. Re-addressing the Issue of Cross-national Variation. European Sociological Review, 19, 393-409.
34. Lipsmeyer, C. S. and Nordstrom, T. (2003). East Versus West: Comparing Political Attitudes and Welfare Preferences Across European Countries. Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 339-364.
35. Lübker, M. (2007). Inequality and the Demand for Redistribution: Are the Assumptions of the New Growth Theory Valid? Socio-Economic Review, 5, 117-148.
36. March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.
37. Mau, S. (2004). Welfare Regimes and the Norms of Social Exchange. Current Sociology, 52, 53-74.
38. McLachlan, G. J. and Basford, K. E. (1988). Mixture Models: Inference and Application to Clustering. New York: Marcel Dekker.
39. Mehrtens, F. J. (2004). Three Worlds of Public Opinion? Values, Variation, and the Effect on Social Policy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16, 115-143.
40. Moene, K.O. and Wallerstein, M. (2001). Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution. American Political Science Review, 95, 859-874.
41. Molina, O. and Rhodes, M. (2002). Corporatism: The Past, Present, and Future of a Concept. Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 305-331.
42. OECD (1998). Lifelong Learning for All. OECD Observer No. 214, October/November 1998.
43. OECD (1999). Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.
44. OECD (2000). Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.
45. OECD (2004). Social Expenditure Database (SocX 2004). Paris: OECD.
46. Papadakis, E. and Bean, C. (1993). Popular Support for the Welfare State: A Comparison Between Institutional Regimes. Journal of Public Policy, 13, 227-254.
47. Powers, D. A. and Xie, Y. (2000). Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis. London: Academic Press.
48. Roller, E. (1992). Einstellungen der Bürger zum Wohlfahrtsstaat der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
49. Rothstein, B. (1998). Just Institutions Matter. The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Saind-Arnaud, S. and Bernard, P. (2003). Convergence or Resilience? A Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of the Welfare Regimes in Advanced Countries. Current Sociology, 51, 499-527.
51. Sanders, M. S. (2001). Uncertainty and Turnout. Political Analysis, 9, 45-57.
52. Scruggs, L. (2005). Welfare State Entitlements Data Set: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Eighteen Welfare States, Version 1.1. University of Connecticut.
53. Scruggs, L. and Allan, J. (2006). Welfare State Decommodification in Eighteen OECD Countries: A Replication and Revision. Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 55-72.
54. Shibuya, K., Hashimoto, H. and Yano, E. (2002). Individual Income, Income Distribution, and Self Rated Health in Japan: Cross Sectional Analysis of a Nationally Representative Sample. British Medical Journal, 324, 16.
55. Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement. European Journal of Political Research, 36, 175-205.
56. Svallfors, S. (1991). The Politics of Welfare Policy in Sweden: Structural Determinants and Attitudinal Cleavages. British Journal of Sociology, 42, 609-634.
57. Svallfors, S. (1997). Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations. European Sociological Review, 13, 283-304.
58. Svallfors, S. (1999). Political Trust and Attitudes Towards Redistribution. A Comparison of Sweden and Norway. European Societies, 1, 241-268.
59. Svallfors, S. (2003). Welfare Regimes and Western Opinions: A Comparison of Eight Western Countries. Social Indicators Research, 64, 495-520.
60. Svallfors, S. (2004). Class, Attitudes and the Welfare State: Sweden in Comparative Perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 38, 119-138.
61. Svallfors, S. (2006). The Moral Economy of Class. Class Attitudes in Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.