Demand for milk labels in Germany: Organic milk, conventional brands, and retail labels

Agribusiness

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 192-206

  Jonas, Astrid ^a   Roosen, Jutta ^b  

^a ABBOTT GMBH AND CO KG   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73449131505     PISSN: 07424477     EISSN: 15206297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/agr.20155     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Berges-Sennou, F., Bontems, P., & Requillart, V. (2004). Economics of private labels: A survey of literature. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 2, 1-23.
2. Bruhn, M. (2002). Die Nachfrage nach Bioprodukten. Eine Langzeitstudie unter besonderer Berucksichtigung von Verbrauchereinstellungen. [The demand for organic products. A long-term study with particular consideration to consumer attitudes.]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
3. Buse, A., & Chan, W.H. (2000). Invariance, price indices and estimation in almost ideal demand systems. Empirical Economics, 25(3), 515-539.
4. Conner, D., & Christy, R. (2004). The organic label: How to reconcile its meaning with consumer preferences. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 35(1), 40-43.
5. Deaton, A.S., & Muellbauer, J. (1980). An almost ideal demand system. American Economic Review, 70(June), 312-326.
6. Dhar, T., Chavas, J.-P., Cotterill, R.W., & Gould, B.W. (2005). An econometric analysis of brand-level strategic pricing between Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 14(4), 905-931.
7. Dhar, T., & Foltz, J. (2005). Milk by any other namey. Consumer benefits from labelled milk. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(1), 214-228.
8. Dong, D., Chung, C., & Kaiser, H.M. (2004a). Modelling milk purchasing behaviour with a panel data double-hurdle model. Applied Economics, 36, 769-779.
9. Dong, D., Gould, B.W., & Kaiser, H.M. (2004b). Food demand in Mexico: An application of the Amemiya-Tobin approach to the estimation of a censored food system. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(4), 1094-1107.
10. Erdem, T., Keane, M.P., & Sun, B. (1999). Missing price and coupon availability data in scanner panels: Correcting for the self-selection bias in choice model parameters. Journal of Econometrics, 89, 177-196.
11. Fricke, A. (1996). Das Kauferverhalten bei Okoprodukten. Eine Langsschnittsanalyse unter Berucksichtigung des Kohortenkonzeptes. [The purchasing behavior for organic products. A cross-section analysis using the concept of cohorts.]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
12. Glaser, L.K., & Thompson, G.D. (1999, August). Demand for organic and conventional frozen vegetables. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Nashville, TN.
13. Glaser, L.K., & Thompson, G.D.(2000, June29-July1). Demand for organic and conventional beverage milk. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Agricultural Economics Association, Vancouver, BC.
14. Gould, B.W., & Dong, D. (2000). The decision of when to buy a frequently purchased good: A multiperiod probit model. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 25(2), 636-652.
15. Govindasamy, R., & Italia, J. (1999). Predicting willingness to pay a premium for organically grown fresh produce. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 30(2), 44-53.
16. Green, R., & Alston, J. (1990). Elasticities in AIDS models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(2), 442-445.
17. Griffiths, W., & Valenzuela, M.R. (1998). Missing data from infrequency of purchase: Bayesian estimation of a linear expenditure system. In T.F. Fomby & R.C. Hill (Eds.), Messy data-missing observations, outliers, and mixed-frequency data: Advances in econometrics (Vol. 13, pp. 75-102). Stamford, CT; London: JAI Press.
18. Heien, D.M., & Wessells, C.R. (1988). The demand for dairy products: Structure, prediction, and decomposition. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 219-228.
19. Heien, D.M., & Wessells, C.R. (1990). Demand systems estimation with microdata: A censored regression approach. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8(July), 365-371.
20. IFAV. (2001). Verbraucherverhalten beim Lebensmittelkauf. Koln. ITC. (2002). Overview world markets for organic food and beverages (Estimates). Retrieved April 21, 2006, from http://www.intracen.org/mds/sectors/organic/overview.pdf
21. Jorgensen, C. (2001). Prisbildning och Efterfragan pa Ekologiska Livsmedel. [Price formation and demand for organic food.]. Livsmedelsekonomiska institutet, Lund.
22. Keane, M.P. (1997). Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15(3), 310-327.
23. Lambert, R., Larue, B., Yelou, C., & Criner, G. (2006). Fish and meat demand in Canada: Regional differences and weak separability. Agribusiness, 22(2), 175-199.
24. Loureiro, M., McCluskey, J., & Mittelhammer, R.C. (2001). Assessing consumer preferences for organic, eco-labeled, and regular apples. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26(2), 404-416.
25. Meyerhoefer, C.D., Ranney, C.K., & Sahn, D.E. (2005). Consistent estimation of censored demand systems using panel data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(3), 660-672.
26. Moschini, G. (1995). Units of measurement and the Stone index in demand system estimation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(1), 63-68.
27. Nielsen, A.C. (2005). The power of private labels 2005. A review of growth trends around the world. Retrieved April21,2006, from http://www.acnielsen.de/pubs/documents/ThePowerofPrivateLabel2005.pdf
28. Perali, F., & Chavas, J.-P. (2000). Estimation of censored demand equations from large cross-section data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(4), 1022-1037.
29. Richter, T. (2005). The organic market in Germany-Overview and information on market access. Geschaftsstelle Bundesprogramm okologischer Landbau in der Bundesanstalt fur Landwirtschaft und Ernahrung. Retrieved May 17, 2007, from http://www.oekolandbau.de/fileadmin/redaktion/bestellformular/pdf/031105.pdf
30. Shonkwiler, J.S., & Yen, S.T. (1999). Two-step estimation of a censored system of equations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 972-982.
31. Thiele, S. (2001). Ausgaben- und Preiselastizitaten der Nahrungsmittelnachfrage auf Basis von Querschnittsdaten: Eine Systemschatzung fur die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. [Expendi-ture and price elasticities of food demand on the basis of cross-section data: A system analysis for Germany.]. Agrarwirtschaft, 50, 108-115.
32. Thiele, S. (2007). Elastizitaten der Nachfrage nach Nahrungsmitteln. [Elasticities of the demand for food.]. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kiel, Department of Food Economics and Consumption Studies.
33. Thompson, G., & Kidwell, J. (1998). Explaining the choice of organic produce, cosmetic defects, prices and consumer preferences. American Journal, 7-287.
34. Wier, M., Hansen, L.G., Moerch Andersen, L., & Millock, A. (2002, September). Consumer preferences for organic foods, OECD Workshop on Organic Agriculture, Washington, DC. Retrieved January5,2005, from http://www.akf.dk/organicfoods/conference/OECDpaper.pdf
35. Wier, M., & Smed, S. (2000). Forbrug af økologiske fødevarer. Del 2: Modellering af efterspørgslen. [Consumption of organic food. Part 2.]. Rapport nr. 319, Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, København.
36. Yen, S.T., & Huang, C.L. (2002). Cross-sectional estimation of U.S. demand for beef products: A censored demand system. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 27(2),320-334.
37. Yen, S.T., Kan, K., & Su, S.-J. (2002). Household demand for fats and oils: Two-step estimation of a censored demand system. Applied Economics, 14, 1799-1806.