Practitioner approaches to the integration of clinical decision support system technology in critical care

Journal of Nursing Administration

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 465-469

  Weber, Scott ^a   Crago, Elizabeth A ^a   Sherwood, Paula R ^a   Smith, Tara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MALE; MANPOWER; MEDICAL STAFF; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARD; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 73449113003     PISSN: 00020443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181bd5fc2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Saletnik LA, Niedlinger MK, Wilson M. Nursing resource considerations for implementing an electronic documentation system. AORN J. 2008;87(3):585-596.
2. Lapoint L, Rivard S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. CMAJ. 2006;174(11):1573-1578.
3. Menachemi N, Chukmaitov A, Saunders C, Brooks RG. Hospital quality of care: does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption and quality of care. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008;33(1):51-59.
4. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;29(10):1223-1238.
5. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742-752.
6. Benbasat I, Dexter AS. Individual differences in the use of decision support aids. J Account Res. 1982;20(1):1-11.
7. Mock TJ, Estrin TL, Vasarhelyi MA. Learning patterns and decision time. J Account Res. 1973;10(1):129-153.
8. Newman M, Robey D. A social process model of useranalyst relationships. MIS Q. 1993;16(2):249-265.
9. Taylor RN. Age and experience as determinants of managerial information processing and decision making performance. Acad Manage J. 2005;18(1):74-81.
10. Zinkhan RR, Joachimsthaler R, Kinnear LO. Research Methods in Nursing. New York, NY: Sage; 1987.
11. Burkes M. Identifying and relating nurses' attitudes toward computer use. Comput Nurs. 2001;9:190-201.
12. Gardner RM, Lundsgaarde HP. Evaluation of user acceptance of a clinical expert system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1:428-438.
13. Sultana N. Nurses' attitudes towards computerization in clinical practice. J Adv Nurs. 1990;15:696-702.
14. Barkin SR. An investigation of information system utilization. Inf Manage. 1977;1:35-45.
15. Ginzberg MJ. A study of the implementation process. TIMIS Stud Manage Sci. 1979;13:85-102.
16. Ives Band, Olson MH. User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Manag Sci. 2004;30(5):580-603.
17. Keen PG. Information systems and organizational change. Commun ACM. 2001;24(1):24-32.
18. Mallach EG. Training paradigms. Manag End User Comput. 2001;4(9):5-6.
19. Swanson EB. Management information systems: appreciation and involvement. Manag Sci. 2004;21(2):178-188.
20. Tait P, Vessey I. The effect of user involvement on system success: a contingency approach. MIS Q. 1989;12(1):91-107.
21. Adams DA, Nelson RR, Todd PA. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Q. 1992;16(2):227-247.
22. Alavi M, Henderson JC. An evolutionary strategy for implementing a decision support system. Manag Sci. 1981; 27(11):1309-1323.
23. Barki H, Hartwick J. Measuring user participation, user involvement and user attitude. MIS Q. 1994;18(1):59-78.
24. King WR, Rodriguez JI. Participative design of strategic decision support systems: an empirical assessment. Manag Sci. 2001;27:717-726.
25. Gore ML, Persaud D, Dawe U. Evaluation of the effect of a computer orientation program on nurse employees' attitudes to computerization. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IMIA International Conference on Nursing Use of Computers and Information Science, August 24-26, 1994. San Antonio, TX: International Medical Informatics Conference; 1994.
26. Todd P, Benbasat I. The use of information in decision making: an experimental investigation of the impact of computer-based decision aids. MIS Q. 2002;16(3):373-395.
27. Firby KA, Luker KA, Caress AL. Nurses' opinions of the introduction of computer-assisted learning for use in patient education. Comput Nurs. 1991;9(1):15-21.
28. Andre B, Ringdal GI, Loge JH, Rannestad R, Kaasa S. The importance of key personnel and active management for successful implementation of computer-based technology in palliative care: results from a qualitative study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008;26(4):183-189.
29. Weber S. Critical care nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists interface patterns with computer-based decision support systems [review]. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007; 19(11):580-590.
30. Weber S. A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007;19(12):652-667.
31. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Aldine; 1967.