Countergradient variation in temperature preference in populations of killifish Fundulus heteroclitus

Physiological and Biochemical Zoology

Volumn 82, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 776-786

  Fangue, Nann A ^a   Podrabsky, Jason E ^b   Crawshaw, Larry I ^b   Schulte, Patricia M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCLIMATION; CYPRINID; ECTOTHERMY; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; LOCAL ADAPTATION; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SELECTION; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

ADAPTATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TEMPERATURE; THERMOREGULATION;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BODY TEMPERATURE REGULATION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FUNDULIDAE; MALE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TEMPERATURE;

CYPRINODONTIFORMES; CYPRINODONTOIDEI; FUNDULUS HETEROCLITUS;

EID: 73449112636     PISSN: 15222152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/606030     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alvarez D., J. M. Cano, and A. G. Nicieza. 2006. Microgeographic variation in metabolic rate and energy storage of brown trout: countergradient selection or thermal sensitivity? Evol Ecol 20:345-363.
2. Angilletta M. J., Jr., A. F. Bennett, H. Guderley, C. A. Navas, F. Seebacher, and R. S. Wilson. 2006. Coadaptation: a unifying principle in evolutionary thermal biology. Physiol Biochem Zool 79:282-294.
3. Angilletta M. J., Jr., P. H. Niewiarowski, and C. A. Navas. 2002. The evolution of thermal physiology in ectotherms. J Therm Biol 27:249-268.
4. Angilletta M. J., Jr., R. S. Wilson, C. A. Navas, and R. S. James. 2003. Trade-offs and the evolution of thermal reaction norms. Trends Ecol Evol 18:234-240.
5. Barans C. A. and R. A. Tubb. 1973. Temperatures selected seasonally by four fishes from western Lake Erie. J Fish Res Board Can 30:1697-1703.
6. Beitinger T. L., W. A. Bennett, and R. W. McCauley. 2000. Temperature tolerances of North American freshwater fishes exposed to dynamic changes in temperature. Environ Biol Fish 58:237-275.
7. Beitinger T. L. and L. C. Fitzpatrick. 1979. Physiological and ecological correlates of preferred temperature in fish. Am Zool 19:319-329.
8. Beitinger T. L. and J. J. Magnuson. 1976. Low thermal responsiveness in the bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus. J Fish Res Board Can 33:293-295.
9. Bicego K. C., R. C. H. Barros, and L. G. S. Branco. 2006. Physiology of temperature regulation: comparative aspects. Comp Physiol Biochem A 147:616-639.
10. Cadena V. and G. J. Tattersall. 2009. Decreased precision contributes to the hypoxic thermoregulatory response in lizards. J Exp Biol 212:137-144.
11. Clarke A. 2003. Costs and consequences of evolutionary temperature adaptation. Trends Ecol Evol 18:573-580.
12. Clutterham S., A. K. Gamperl, H. L. Wallace, L. I. Crawshaw, and A. P. Farrell. 2003. Exhaustive exercise does not affect the preferred temperature for recovery in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Physiol Biochem Zool 77:611-618.
13. Conover D. O. and E. T. Schultz. 1995. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:248-252.
14. Crawshaw L. I. and C. S. O'Connor. 1997. Behavioural compensation for long-term thermal change. Pp. 351-376 in C. M. Wood and D. G. McDonald, eds. Global Warming: Implications for Freshwater and Marine Fish. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. Despatie S. P., M. Castonguay, D. Chabot, and C. Audet. 2001. Final thermal preferendum of Atlantic cod: effect of food ration. Trans Am Fish Soc 130:263-275.
16. Diaz J. A. 1997. Ecological correlates of the thermal quality of an ectotherm's habitat: a comparison between two temperate lizard populations. Funct Ecol 11:79-89.
17. Ellner L. R. and W. H. Karasov. 1993. Latitudinal variation in the thermal biology of ornate box turtles. Copeia 1993:447-455.
18. Fangue N. A., M. Hofmeister, and P. M. Schulte. 2006. Intraspecific variation in thermal tolerance and heat shock protein gene expression in common killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus. J Exp Biol 209:2859-2872.
19. Fangue N. A., M. Mandic, J. G. Richards, and P. M. Schulte. 2008. Swimming performance and energetics as a function of temperature in killifish Fundulus heteroclitus. Physiol Biochem Zool 81:389-401.
20. 2 hybrids. Trans Am Fish Soc 116:856-863.
21. Freidenburg L. K. and D. K. Skelly. 2004. Microgeographical variation in thermal preference by an amphibian. Ecol Lett 7:369-373.
22. Fry F. E. J. 1947. Effects of the Environment on Animal Activity. University of Toronto Studies Biological Series 55. Publications of the Ontario Fisheries Research Laboratory, Toronto.
23. Gamperl A. K., K. J. Rodnick, H. A. Faust, E. C. Venn, M. T. Bennett, E. R. Keeley, M. S. Powell, and H. W. Li. 2002. Metabolism, swimming performance, and tissue biochemistry of high desert redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss sp.): evidence for phenotypic difference in physiological function. Physiol Biochem Zool 75:413-431.
24. Garside E. T. and G. C. Morrison. 1977. Thermal preferences of mummichog, Fundulus heteroclitus L., and banded killifish, F. diaphanus (LeSueur), (Cyprinodontidae) in relation to thermal acclimation and salinity. Can J Zool 55:1190-1194.
25. Hall L. W., Jr., C. H. Hocutt, and J. R. Stauffer Jr. 1978. Implication of geographic location on temperature preference of white perch, Morone americana. J Fish Res Board Can 35:1464-1468.
26. Hochachka P. W. and G. N. Somero. 2002. Biochemical adaptation: mechanism and process in physiological evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
27. Huey R. B. and J. G. Kingsolver. 1993. Evolution of resistance to high temperature in ectotherms. Am Nat 142 (suppl.):S21-S46.
28. Jobling M. 1981. Temperature tolerance and the final preferendum: rapid methods for the assessment of optimum growth temperatures. J Fish Biol 19:439-455.
29. Johnson J. A. and S. W. Kelsch. 1998. Effects of evolutionary thermal environment on temperature-preference relationships in fishes. Environ Biol Fish 53:447-458.
30. Katoh F., S. Hasegawa, J. Kita, Y. Takagi, and T. Kaneko. 2001. Distinct seawater and freshwater types of chloride cells in killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus. Can J Zool 79:822-829.
31. Kelsch S. W. 1996. Temperature selection and performance by bluegills: evidence for selection in response to available power. Trans Am Fish Soc 125:948-955.
32. Konecki J. T., C. A. Woody, and T. P. Quinn. 1995. Temperature preference in two populations of juvenile coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch. Environ Biol Fish 44:417-421.
33. Koppelman J. B., G. S. Whitt, and D. P. Philipp. 1988. Thermal preferenda of northern, Florida, and reciprocal F1 hybrid largemouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 117:238-244.
34. Larsson S. 2005. Thermal preference of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, and brown trout, Salmo trutta: implications for their niche segregation. Environ Biol Fish 73:89-96.
35. Lonsdale D. J. and J. S. Levinton. 1985. Latitudinal differentiation in copepod growth: an adaptation to temperature. Ecology 66:1397-1407.
36. Magee A., C. A. Myrick, and J. J. Cech. 1999. Thermal preference of female threespine sticklebacks under fed and fooddeprived conditions. Calif Fish Game 85:102-112.
37. Magnuson J. J. and T. L. Beitinger. 1978. Stabilityof temperatures preferred by centrarchid fishes and terrestrial reptiles. Pp. 181-216 in E. S. Teese and F. Lighter, eds. Contrasts in Behavior. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
38. Marcil J., D. P. Swain, and J. A. Hutchings. 2006. Genetic and environmental components of phenotypic variation in body shape among populations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Biol J Linn Soc 88:351-365.
39. McCauley R. W. and J. W. Casselman. 1981. The final preferendum as an index of the temperature for optimum growth in fish. Pp. 81-93. Proceedings of the World Symposium on Aquaculture in Heated Effluents and Recirculation Systems. European Inland Fisheries Advisory Committee, Berlin.
40. Meldrim J. W. and J. J. Gift. 1971. Temperature preference, avoidance, and shock experiments with estuarine fishes. Ichthyol Assoc Bull 7:75.
41. Morin R. P. and K. W. Able. 1983. Patterns of geographic variation in the egg morphology of the fundulid fish, F. heteroclitus. Copeia 1983:726-740.
42. Reynolds W. W. and M. E. Casterlin. 1979. Behavioral thermoregulation and the "final preferendum" paradigm. Am Zool 19:211-224.
43. Schulte P. M., M. C. Gomez-Chiarri, and D. A. Powers. 1997. Variation in the structure and function of the promoter and 5' flanking region of the Ldh-B locus between populations of the teleost Fundulus heteroclitus. Genetics 145:759-769.
44. Schultz E. T., K. E. Reynolds, and D. O. Conover. 1996. Countergradient variation in growth among newly hatched Fundulus heteroclitus: geographic differences revealed by common environment experiments. Funct Ecol 10:366-374.
45. Scott G. R., J. T. Rogers, J. G. Richards, C. M. Wood, and P. M. Schulte. 2004. Intraspecific divergence of ionoregulatory physiology in the euryhaline teleost Fundulus heteroclitus: possible mechanisms of freshwater adaptation. J Exp Biol 207:3399-3410.
46. Somero G. N. 2002. Thermal physiology and vertical zonation of intertidal animals: optima, limits, and costs of living. Integr Comp Biol 42:780-789.
47. Tsuchida S. 1995. The relationship between upper temperature tolerance and final preferendum of Japanese marine fish. J Therm Biol 20:35-41.
48. Wollmuth L. P., L. I. Crawshaw, and H. Panayiotides-Djaferis. 1987. Thermoregulatory effects of intracranial norepinephrine injections in goldfish. Am J Physiol 253:821-826.
49. Yamahira K. and D. O. Conover. 2002. Intra-vs. interspecific latitudinal variation in growth: adaptation to temperature and seasonality? Ecology 83:1252-1262.
50. Yamahira K., M. Kawajiri, K. Takeshi, and T. Irie. 2007. Interand intrapopulation variation in thermal reaction norms for growth rate: evolution of latitudinal compensation in ectotherms with a genetic constraint. Evolution 61:1577-1589.