Implementation of MR colonography

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 457-462

  Achiam, M P ^a   Chabanova, E ^a   Logager V ^a   Thomsen, H S ^a   Rosenberg, J ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Barium sulphate; Colonoscopy; Fecal tagging; Ferumoxsil; MR colonography

Indexed keywords

BARIUM SULFATE; FERUMOXSIL; GLUCAGON; RECOMBINANT GLUCAGON; SCOPOLAMINE BUTYL BROMIDE;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IRRITABLE COLON; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; BARIUM SULFATE; COLONIC DISEASES; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXIDES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SILOXANES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 34548536105     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-006-9143-7     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Vining DJGD (1994) Noninvasive colonoscopy using helical CT scanning, 3D reconstruction and virtual reality. SGR scientific program 1994, Maui, Hawai, February, vol 70
2. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, et al. (1997) Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 349(9061):1288-1291
3. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. (2006) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 56(2):106-130
4. Leslie A, Carey FA, Pratt NR, et al. (2002) The colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Br J Surg 89(7):845-860
5. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, et al. (2000) Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 216(2):383-388
6. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, et al. (2000) Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 119(2):300-304
7. Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, et al. (2003) Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 52(12):1738-1743
8. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. (2004) MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention? J Magn Reson Imaging 19(2):216-221
9. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. (1993) Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota colon cancer control study. N Engl J Med 328(19):1365-1371
10. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. (1996) Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348(9040):1472-1477
11. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. (1996) Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348(9040):1467-1471
12. Gedebou TM, Wong RA, Rappaport WD, et al. (1996) Clinical presentation and management of iatrogenic colon perforations. Am J Surg 172(5):454-457
13. Achiam MP, Bulow S, Rosenberg J (2002) CT- and MR colonography. Scand J Surg 91(4):322-327
14. Cobb WS, Heniford BT, Sigmon LB, et al. (2004) Colonoscopic perforations: incidence, management, and outcomes. Am Surg 70(9):750-757
15. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112(1):24-28
16. Weishaupt D, Patak MA, Froehlich J, et al. (1999) Faecal tagging to avoid colonic cleansing before MRI colonography. Lancet 354(9181):835-836
17. Lauenstein T, Holtmann G, Schoenfelder D, et al. (2001) MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(4):823-827
18. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, et al. (2002) MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 223(1):248-254
19. Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Maris T, et al. (2003) MR colonography with fecal tagging: comparison between 2D turbo FLASH and 3D FLASH sequences. Eur Radiol 13(3):448-452
20. Goehde SC, Descher E, Boekstegers A, et al. (2005) Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom Imaging 30(5):576-583
21. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al. (2002) Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222(2):337-345