The utility of molecular hypotheses for uncovering morphological diversity in the notropis rubellus species complex (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)

Copeia

Volumn , Issue 4, 2009, Pages 661-673

  Berendzen, Peter B ^a   Olson, Wendy M ^a   Barron, Scott M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANONICAL ANALYSIS; CYPRINID; DETECTION METHOD; DIVERGENCE; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPECIES COMPLEX; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

NORTH AMERICA;

CYPRINIDAE; CYPRINIFORMES; NOTROPIS RUBELLUS;

EID: 73449101856     PISSN: 00458511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1643/CI-09-013     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams, D. C., F. J. Rohlf, and D. E. Slice. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the revolution. Italian Journal of Zoology 71:5-16.
2. Berendzen, P. B., A. M. Simons, R. M. Wood, T. E. Dowling, and C. L. Secor. 2008. Recovering cryptic diversity and ancient drainage patterns in eastern North America: Historical biogeography of the Notropis rubellus species group (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 46:721-737.
3. Bickford, D., D. J. Lohman, N. S. Sodhi, P. K. L. Ng, R. Meier, K. Winker, K. K. Ingram, and I. Das. 2006. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:148-155.
4. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Clabaut, C., P. M. E. Bunje, W. Salzburger, and A. Meyer. 2007. Geometric morphometric analyses provide evidence for the adaptive character of the Tanganyikan cichlid fish radiations. Evolution 61:560-578.
6. de Queiroz, K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56:879-886.
7. Dingerkus, G., and L. D. Uhler. 1977. Enzyme clearing of alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. Stain Technology 52:229-232.
8. Egge, J. J. D., and A. M. Simons. 2006. The challenge of truly cryptic diversity: Diagnosis and description of a new madtom catfish (Ictaluridae: Noturus). Zoologica Scripta 35:581-595.
9. Eisenhour, D. J., and L. V. Eisenhour. 2004. Morphological variation and systematics of the Notropis rubellus complex in Kentucky and Tennessee. Southeastern Naturalist 3: 431-450.
10. Guill, J. M., D. C. Heins, and C. S. Hood. 2003. The effect of phylogeny on interspecific body shape variation in darters (Pisces: Percidae). Systematic Biology 52:488-500.
11. Highton, R. 1995. Speciation in eastern North American salamanders of the genus Plethodon. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26:579-600.
12. Hillis, D. M. 1987. Molecules vs. morphological approaches to systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:23-42.
13. Hubbs, C. L., and K. F. Lagler. 1964. Fishes of the Great Lakes Region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
14. Hubbs, C. L., and A. I. Ortenburger. 1929. Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927. University of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1:45-112.
15. Humphries, J. M., and R. C. Cashner. 1994. Notropis suttkusi, a new cyprinid from the Ouachita Uplands of Oklahoma and Arkansas, with comments on the status of Ozarkian populations of N. rubellus. Copeia 1994: 82-90.
16. Jenkins, R. E., and N. M. Burkhead. 1994. Freshwater Fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.
17. Jockusch, E. L., and D. B. Wake. 2002. Falling apart and merging: Diversification of slender salamanders (Plethodontidae: Batrachoseps) in the American west. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76:361-391.
18. Knowles, L. L., and B. C. Carstens. 2007. Delimiting species without monophyletic genes. Systematic Biology 56: 887-895.
19. Kumar, S., K. Tamura, and M. Nei. 2004. MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics 5:150-163.
20. Nei, M. 2007. The new mutation theory of phenotypic evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:12235-12242.
21. Nei, M., and W. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 76:5269-5273.
22. Olson, L. E., S. M. Goodman, and A. D. Yoder. 2004. Illumination of cryptic species boundaries in long-tailed shrew tenrecs (Mammalia: Tenrecidae: Microgale), with new insights into geographic variation and distributional constraints. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 83:1-22.
23. Page, L. M., and E. G. Beckham. 1987. Notropis rupestris, a new Cyprinid from the Middle Cumberland River system, Tennessee, with comments on variation in Notropis heterolepis. Copeia 1987:659-668.
24. Patterson, C., D. M. Williams, and C. J. Humphries. 1993. Congruence between molecular and morphological phylogenies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:153-188.
25. Phillimore, A. B., I. P. F. Owens, R. A. Black, J. Chittock, T. Burke, and S. M. Clegg. 2008. Complex patterns of genetic and phenotypic divergence in an island bird and the consequences for delimiting conservation units. Molecular Ecology 17:2839-2853.
26. Potthoff, T. 1984. Clearing and staining techniques, p. 35-37. In: Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes. H. G. Moser, W. J. Richards, D. M. Cohen, M. P. Fahay, W. Kendall, Jr., and S. L. Richardson (eds.). American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists Special Publication No. 1. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.
27. Puorto, G., M. Da Graca Salomão, R. D. G. Theakston, R. S. Thorpe, D. A. Warrell, and W. Wüster. 2001. Combining mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphological data to infer species boundaries: Phylogeography of lanceheaded pitvipers in the Brazilian Atlantic forest, and the status of Bothrops pradoi (Squamata: Serpentes: Viperidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14:527-538.
28. Raxworthy, C. J., C. M. Ingram, N. Rabibisoa, and R. G. Pearson. 2007. Applications of ecological niche modeling for species delimitation: A review and empirical evaluation using day geckos (Phelsuma) from Madagascar. Systematic Biology 56:907-923.
29. Rissler, L. J., and J. J. Apodaca. 2007. Adding more ecology into species delimitation: Ecological niche models and phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneides flavipunctatus). Systematic Biology 56:924-942.
30. Rohlf, F. J. 1996. TpsDig2 ver. 2.05. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook. Available via http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/ soft-dataacq.html
31. Sheets, H. D. 2004. IMP-Integrated Morphometrics Package. Department of Physics, Canisius College. Available via http://www3.canisius.edu/,sheets/ morphsoft.html
32. Sites, J. W., and J. C. Marshall. 2003. Delimiting species: A renaissance issue in systematic biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:462-470.
33. Sites, J. W., and J. C. Marshall. 2004. Operational criteria for delimiting species. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35:199-227.
34. Wake, D. B., G. Roth, and M. H. Wake. 1983. On the problem of stasis in organismal evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 101:211-224.
35. Wiens, J. J. 2007. Species delimitation: New approaches for discovering diversity. Systematic Biology 56:875-878.
36. Wiens, J. J., and T. A. Penkrot. 2002. Delimiting species using DNA and morphological variation and discordant species limits in spiny lizards (Sceloporus). Systematic Biology 51:69-91.
37. Wood, R. M., R. L. Mayden, R. H. Matson, B. R. Kuhajda, and S. R. Layman. 2002. Systematics and biogeography of the Notropis rubellus species group (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Bulletin of the Alabama Museum of Natural History 22:37-80.
38. Zelditch, M. L., D. L. Swiderski, H. D. Sheets, and W. L. Fink. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego.