Older patients can accurately recall their preoperative health status six weeks following total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 91, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2827-2837

  Marsh, Jackie ^a   Bryant, Dianne ^a   MacDonald, Steven J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE HEALTH STATUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL; RECALL BIAS; RELIABILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; SELF REPORT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 73349125780     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01415     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bryant D, Norman G, Stratford P, Marx RG, Walter SD, Guyatt G. Patients undergoing knee surgery provided accurate ratings of preoperative quality of life and function 2 weeks after surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:984-93. (Pubitemid 44163428)
2. Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther. 1999;79:371-83.
3. Watson CJ, Propps M, Ratner J, Zeigler DL, Horton P, Smith SS. Reliability and responsiveness of the lower extremity functional scale and the anterior knee pain scale in patients with anterior knee pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35:136-46.
4. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-40.
5. Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bellamy N. Comparison of the responsiveness and relative effect size of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the short-form Medical Outcomes Study Survey in a randomized, clinical trial of osteoarthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res. 1999;12:172-9. (Pubitemid 29508666)
6. Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bolognese JA, Seidenberg BC, Bellamy N. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:2635-41.
7. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray D. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1125-9.
8. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care. 1996;5:81-8.
9. Pynsent PB, Adams DJ, Disney SP. The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:241-8.
10. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, Dawson J. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1010-4. (Pubitemid 47492792)
11. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-33.
12. Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001;33:344-9.
13. Puhan MA, Guyatt GH, Montori VM, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Griffith L, Goldstein R, Schünemann HJ. The standard gamble demonstrated lower reliability than the feeling thermometer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:458-65.
14. Schünemann HJ, Griffith L, Stubbing D, Goldstein R, Guyatt GH. A clinical trial to evaluate the measurement properties of 2 direct preference instruments administered with and without hypothetical marker states. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:140-9. (Pubitemid 36373396)
15. Schünemann HJ, Griffith L, Jaeschke R, Goldstein R, Stubbing D, Guyatt GH. Evaluation of the minimal important difference for the feeling thermometer and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1170-6.
16. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002;21:1331-5.
17. Stratford PW, Goldsmith CH. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther. 1997;77:745-50.
18. Pitman EJG. A note on normal correlation. Biometrika. 1939;31:9-12.
19. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1967.
20. Schwartz CE, Sprangers MA. Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1531-48.
21. Cohen BH. Explaining psychological statistics. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2001. p 258-87.
22. Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1507-15.
23. Ross M. Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review. 1989;96:341-57.
24. Baddeley A. Human memory. Theory and practice. Revised ed. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press; 1997.
25. Babul N, Darke AC, Johnson DH, Charron-Vincent K. Using memory for pain in analgesic research. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:9-12.
26. Singer AJ, Kowalska A, Thode HC Jr. Ability of patients to accurately recall the severity of acute painful events. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:292-5. (Pubitemid 32201704)
27. Zonneveld LN, McGrath PJ, Reid GJ, Sorbi MJ. Accuracy of children's pain memories. Pain. 1997;71:297-302.
28. Hunter M, Philips C, Rachman S. Memory for pain. Pain. 1979;6:35-46.
29. Kreulen GJ, Stommel M, Gutek BA, Burns LR, Braden CJ. Utility of retrospective pretest ratings of patient satisfaction with health status. Res Nurs Health. 2002;25:233-41.
30. ten Klooster PM, Drossaers-Bakker KW, Taal E, van de Laar MA. Can we assess baseline pain and global health retrospectively? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25:176-81.
31. Pellisé F, Vidal X, Hernández A, Cedraschi C, Bagó J, Villanueva C. Reliability of retrospective clinical data to evaluate the effectiveness of lumbar fusion in chronic low back pain. Spine. 2005;30:365-8.
32. Everts B, Karlson B, Währborg P, Abdon N, Herlitz J, Hedner T. Pain recollection after chest pain of cardiac origin. Cardiology. 1999;92:115-20.
33. Aseltine RH Jr, Carlson KJ, Fowler FJ Jr, Barry MJ. Comparing prospective and retrospective measures of treatment outcomes. Med Care. 1995;33(4 Suppl):AS67-76.
34. Lingard EA, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Kinemax Outcomes Group. Pitfalls of using patient recall to derive preoperative status in outcome studies of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1149-56.
35. Mancuso CA, Charlson ME. Does recollection error threaten the validity of cross-sectional studies of effectiveness? Med Care. 1995;33(4 Suppl):AS77-88.
36. Linton SJ, Melin L. The accuracy of remembering chronic pain. Pain. 1982;13:281-5.
37. Dawson EG, Kanim LE, Sra P, Dorey FJ, Goldstein TB, Delamarter RB, Sandhu HS. Low back pain recollection versus concurrent accounts: outcomes analysis. Spine. 2002;27:984-94. (Pubitemid 34506676)
38. Feine JS, Lavigne GJ, Dao TT, Morin C, Lund JP. Memories of chronic pain and perceptions of relief. Pain. 1998;77:137-41.
39. Elliott AM, Smith BH, Hannaford PC, Smith WC, Chambers WA. Assessing change in chronic pain severity: the chronic pain grade compared with retrospective perceptions. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:269-74.
40. Cronbach LJ, Furby L. How should we measure 'change' - or should we? Psychol Bull. 1970;74:68-80.
41. Knapp TR. The (un)reliability of change scores in counseling research. Meas Eval Guid. 1980;13:149-57.
42. Lee J. A note on the comparison of group means based on repeated measurements of the same subject. J Chronic Dis. 1980;33:673-5.
43. Norman GR. Issues in the use of change scores in randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:1097-105.
44. Oldham PD. A note on the analysis of repeated measurements of the same subjects. J Chronic Dis. 1962;15:969-77.
45. Stanek EJ III. Choosing a pretest-posttest analysis. Am Stat. 1988;42:178-83.
46. Frison L, Pocock SJ. Repeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. Stat Med. 1992;11:1685-704.
47. Egger MJ, Coleman ML, Ward JR, Reading JC, Williams HJ. Uses and abuses of analysis of covariance in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1985;6:12-24 (Pubitemid 15101296)