Genetic variation of inbreeding depression among floral and fitness traits in Silene nutans

Heredity

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 52-60

  Thiele, J ^a   Hansen, T ^a   Siegismund, H R ^a   Hauser, T P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; FITNESS; FLORAL TRAIT; GENETIC VARIATION; HERB; PERENNIAL PLANT; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INBREEDING; PHENOTYPE; PLANT SEED; POLLINATION; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION GENETICS; SILENE;

ALGORITHMS; CROSSES, GENETIC; FLOWERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; INBREEDING; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATION; POPULATION DENSITY; SEEDS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SILENE;

NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

SILENE; SILENE NUTANS;

EID: 73349109782     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.103     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007). Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Blackwell: Oxford.
2. Ashman TL, Diefenderfer C (2001). Sex ratio represents a unique context for selection on attractive traits: Consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Am Nat 157: 334-347.
3. Bruun HH, Fritzbger B, Rindel PO, Hansen UL (2001). Plant species richness in grasslands: The relative importance of contemporary environment and land-use history since the Iron Age. Ecography 24: 569-578.
4. Byers DL, Waller DM (1999). Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30: 479-513.
5. Canty A, Ripley B (2002). The boot library. Retrievable at http://mirrors.-sunsite.dk/cran/with documentation at the same URL (by May 2002).
6. Charlesworth D (2006). Evolution of plant breeding systems. Curr Biol 16: R726-R735.
7. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1999). The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet Res Camb 74: 329-340.
8. Charlesworth D, Morgan MT, Charlesworth B (1990). Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44: 1469-1489.
9. Crnokrak P, Barrett SCH (2002). Purging the genetic load: A review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56: 2347-2358.
10. DeRose MA, Roff DA (1999). A comparison of inbreeding depression in life-history and morphological traits in animals. Evolution 53: 1288-1292.
11. Ellmer M, Andersson S (2004). Inbreeding depression in Nigella degenii (Ranunculaceae): Fitness components compared with morphological and phenological characters. Int J Plant Sci 165: 1055-1061.
12. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993). Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24: 217-242.
13. Fishman L (2001). Inbreeding depression in two populations of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae) with contrasting mating systems. Heredity 86: 184-194.
14. Fox CW (2005). Problems in measuring among-family variation in inbreeding depression. Am J Bot 92: 1929-1932.
15. Goodwillie C, Knight MC (2006). Inbreeding depression and mixed mating in Leptosiphon jepsonii: A comparison of three populations. Ann Bot 98: 351-360.
16. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG (2005). The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36: 47-79.
17. Hansen T (2003). Quantitative genetics of sexual allocation and inbreeding depression in hermaphroditic plants with special reference to Silene nutans (Caryophyllaceae). PhD Thesis, University of Copenhagen.
18. Hauser TP, Loeschcke V (1994). Inbreeding depression and mating-distant dependent offspring fitness in large and small populations of Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae). J Evol Biol 7: 609-622.
19. Hauser TP, Loeschcke V (1995). Inbreeding depression in Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae): Effects of different levels of inbreeding. J Evol Biol 8: 589-600.
20. Hauser TP, Loeschcke V (1996). Drought stress and inbreeding depression in Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 50: 1119-1126.
21. Hauser TP, Siegismund HR (2000). Inbreeding and outbreeding effects on pollen fitness and zygote survival in Silene nutans (Caryophyllaceae). J Evol Biol 13: 446-454.
22. Hauser TP, Weidema IR (2000). Extreme variation in flowering time between populations of Silene nutans. Hereditas 132: 95-101.
23. Honnay O, Jacquemyn H (2007). Susceptibility of common and rare plant species to the genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation. Conserv Biol 21: 823-831.
24. Husband B, Schemske D (1996). Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 50-74.
25. Ishida K (2006). Maintenance of inbreeding depression in a highly self-fertilizing tree, Magnolia obovata Thunb. Evol Ecol 20: 173-191.
26. Ishida K (2008). Effects of inbreeding on the magnitude of inbreeding depression in a highly self-fertilizing tree, Magnolia obovata. Ecol Res 23: 995-1003.
27. Jobson JD (1996). AppliedMultivariate Analysis. Springer Verlag: Berlin.
28. Jóhannsson MH, Gates MJ, Stephenson AG (1998). Inbreeding depression affects pollen performance in Cucurbita texana. J Evol Biol 11: 579-588.
29. Johnston MO, Schoen DJ (1994). On the measurement of inbreeding depression. Evolution 48: 1735-1741.
30. Jürgens A, Witt T, Gottsberger G (1996). Reproduction and pollination in central European populations of Silene and Saponaria species. Bot Acta 109: 316-324.
31. Kelly JK (2005). Family level inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems. New Phytol 165: 55-62.
32. Kelly JK, Tourtellot MK (2006). The genetic analysis of family structured inbreeding depression studies. Heredity 97: 346-354.
33. Kramer AT, Ison JL, Ashley MV, Howe HF (2008). The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Conserv Biol 22: 878-885.
34. Leimu R, Mutikainen P, Koricheva J, Fischer M (2006). How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation? J Ecol 94: 942-952.
35. Leimu R, Kloss L, Fischer M (2008). Effects of experimental inbreeding on herbivore resistance and plant fitness: The role of history of inbreeding, herbivory and abiotic factors. Ecol Lett 11: 1101-1110.
36. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998). Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland.
37. Mills LS (2007). Conservation of Wildlife Populations: Demography, Genetics, and Management. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford.
38. Mustajärvi K, Siikamäki P, kerberg A (2005). Inbreeding depression in perennial Lychnis viscaria (Caryophyllaceae): Effects of population mating history and nutrient availability. Am J Bot 92: 1853-1861.
39. Mutikainen P, Delph LF (1998). Inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica: Among-family differences override between-morph differences. Evolution 52: 1572-1582.
40. Oakley CG, Winn AA (2008). Population-level and family-level inbreeding depression in a cleistogamous perennial. Int J Plant Sci 169: 523-530.
41. Ouborg NJ, Vergeer P, Mix C (2006). The rough edges of the conservation genetics paradigm for plants. J Ecol 94: 1233-1248.
42. Owen K, Vaughton G, Ramsey M (2007). Facilitated autogamy and costs of selfing in the perennial herb Bulbine bulbosa (Asphodelaceae). Int J Plant Sci 168: 579-585.
43. Philipp M, Hansen T (2000). The influence of plant and corolla size on pollen deposition and seed set in Geranium sanguineum (Geraniaceae). Nord J Bot 20: 129-140.
44. Picó FX, Ouborg NJ, Van Groenendael JM (2004). Evaluation of the extent of among-family variation in inbreeding depression in the perennial herb Scabiosa columbaria (Dipsacaceae). Am J Bot 91: 1183-1189.
45. Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1998). Phenotypic Evolution. A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland.
46. Scofield DG, Schultz ST (2006). Mitosis, stature and evolution of plant mating systems: low-F and high-F plants. Proc R Soc B 273: 275-282.
47. Shao J, Tu D (1995). The Jackknife and Bootstrap. Springer Verlag: Berlin.
48. Shykoff JA, Bucheli E, Kaltz O (1997). Anther smut disease in Dianthus silvester (Caryophyllaceae): natural selection on floral traits. Evolution 51: 383-392.
49. Uyenoyama MK, Waller DM (1991a). Coevolution of selffertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation-selection balance at one and two loci. Theor Popul Biol 40: 14-46.
50. Uyenoyama MK, Waller DM (1991b). Coevolution of selffertilization and inbreeding depression. II. Symmetric overdominance in viability. Theor Popul Biol 40: 47-77.
51. Uyenoyama MK, Waller DM (1991c). Coevolution of selffertilization and inbreeding depression. III. Homozygous lethal mutations at multiple loci. Theor Popul Biol 40: 173-210.
52. Uyenoyama MK, Holsinger KE, Waller DM (1993). Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. In: Futuyma D, Antonovics J (eds). Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Vol.9 Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp 327-381.
53. Van Rossum F, Prentice HC (2004). Structure of allozyme variation in Nordic Silene nutans (Caryophyllaceae): Population size, geographical position and immigration history. Biol J Linn Soc 81: 357-371.
54. Wang J, Hill WG, Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1999). Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: Mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet Res Camb 74: 165-178.
55. Wright LI, Tregenza T, Hosken DJ (2008). Inbreeding, inbreeding depression and extinction. Conserv Genet 9: 833-843.