Population-level and family-level inbreeding depression in a cleistogamous perennial

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 169, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 523-530

  Oakley, Christopher G ^a   Winn, Alice A ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cleistogamy; Mixed mating; Reproductive strategy; Selfing; Viola septemloba

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; EVOLUTION; HERB; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LIFE CYCLE; OUTCROSSING; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

VIOLA SEPTEMLOBA; VIOLACEAE;

EID: 42549166170     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/528752     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ågren J, DW Schemske 1993 Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in two annual monoecious herbs, Begonia hirsuta and B. semiovata. Evolution 47:125-135.
2. Armbruster P, DH Reed 2005 Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95:235-242.
3. Charlesworth D, B Charlesworth 1987 Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237-268.
4. Cole CT, DD Biesboer 1992 Monomorphism, reduced gene flow, and cleistogamy in rare and common species of Lespedeza (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 79:567-575.
5. Culley TM 2000 Inbreeding depression and floral type fitness differences in Viola canadensis (Violaceae), a species with chasmogamous and cleistogamous flowers. Can J Bot 78:1420-1429.
6. _ 2002 Reproductive biology and delayed selfing in Viola pubescens (Violaceae), an understory herb with chasmogamous and cleistogamous flowers. Int J Plant Sci 163:113-122.
7. Culley TM, MR Klooster 2007 The cleistogamous breeding system: a review of its frequency, evolution, and ecology in angiosperms. Bot Rev 73:1-30.
8. Dudash MR 1990 Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44:1129-1139.
9. Fernald ML 1970 Gray's manual of botany. Van Nostrand, New York. 1632 pp.
10. Fox CW 2005 Problems in measuring among-family variation in inbreeding depression. Am J Bot 92:1929-1932.
11. Goodwillie C, S Kalisz, CG Eckert 2005 The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 36:47-79.
12. Husband BC, DW Schemske 1996 Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
13. Johnston MO, DJ Schoen 1994 On the measurement of inbreeding depression. Evolution 48:1735-1741.
14. Kelly JK 2005 Family level inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems. New Phytol 165:55-62.
15. Kelly JK, MK Tourtellot 2006 The genetic analysis of family structured inbreeding depression studies. Heredity 97:346-354.
16. Lande R, DWSchemske 1985 The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
17. Lloyd DG 1979 Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am Nat 113:67-79.
18. Lu YQ 2000 Effects of density on mixed mating systems and reproduction in natural populations of Impatiens capensis. Int J Plant Sci 161:671-681.
19. _ 2002 Why is cleistogamy a selected reproductive strategy in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae)? Biol J Linn Soc 75:543-553.
20. Masuda M, T Yahara, M Maki 2001 An ESS model for the mixed production of cleistogamous and chasmogamous flowers in a facultative cleistogamous plant. Evol Ecol Res 3:429-439.
21. McCall C, T Mitchell-Olds, DM Waller 1989 Fitness consequences of outcrossing in Impatiens capensis: tests of the frequency-dependent and sib-competition models. Evolution 43:1075-1084.
22. McNamara J, JA Quinn 1977 Resource-allocation and reproduction in populations of Amphicarpum purshii (Gramineae). Am J Bot 64:17-23.
23. Mitchell-Olds T, DM Waller 1985 Relative performance of selfed and outcrossed progeny in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 39:533-544.
24. Moorad JA, MJ Wade 2005 A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression. Genetics 170:1373-1384.
25. Morgan MT, DJ Schoen, TM Bataillon 1997 The evolution of self-fertilization in perennials. Am Nat 150:618-638.
26. Oakley CG, KS Moriuchi, AA Winn 2007 The maintenance of outcrossing in predominantly selfing species: ideas and evidence from cleistogamous species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 38:437-457.
27. Pico FX, NJ Ouborg, JM Van Groenendael 2004 Evaluation of the extent of among-family variation in inbreeding depression in the perennial herb Scabiosa columbaria (Dipsacaceae). Am J Bot 91:1183-1189.
28. SAS 2000 SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
29. Schemske DW 1978 Evolution of reproductive characteristics in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): significance of cleistogamy and chasmogamy. Ecology 59:596-613.
30. Schmitt J, SE Gamble 1990 The effect of distance from the parental site on offspring performance and inbreeding depression in Impatiens capensis: a test of the local adaptation hypothesis. Evolution 44:2022-2030.
31. Schoen DJ, DG Lloyd 1984 The selection of cleistogamy and heteromorphic diaspores. Biol J Linn Soc 23:303-322.
32. Trapp EJ, SD Hendrix 1988 Consequences of a mixed reproductive system in the hog peanut, Amphicarpaea bracteata (Fabaceae). Oecologia 75:285-290.
33. Uyenoyama MK, KE Holsinger, DM Waller 1993 Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 9:327-381.
34. Waller DM 1979 Relative costs of self-fertilized and cross-fertilized seeds in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Am J Bot 66:313-320.
35. Waller DM, SE Knight 1989 Genetic consequences of outcrossing in the cleistogamous annual, Impatiens capensis. 2. Outcrossing rates and genotypic correlations. Evolution 43:860-869.
36. Zeide B 1978 Reproductive behavior of plants in time. Am Nat 112:636-639.