Shannon and entanglement entropies of one- and two-dimensional critical wave functions

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 18, 2009, Pages

  Stéphan, Jean Marie ^a   Furukawa, Shunsuke ^b   Misguich, Grégoire ^a   Pasquier, Vincent ^a  

^a DIF   (France)

^b RIKEN   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73249141480     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.184421     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517 (2008). 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.517
2. C. Holzhey, F. Larsen, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B 424, 443 (1994). 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90402-2
3. G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 227902 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.227902
4. V. E. Korepin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 096402 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 92.096402
5. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2004), 06002. 10.1088/1742-5468/2004/06/P06002
6. H. Casini and M. Huerta, Phys. Lett. B 600, 142 (2004). 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.08.072
7. S. Furukawa, V. Pasquier, and J. Shiraishi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 170602 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.170602
8. P. Calabrese, J. Cardy, and E. Tonni, arXiv:0905.2069 (unpublished).
9. A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110404
10. M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110405
11. M. Haque, O. Zozulya, and K. Schoutens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 060401 (2007) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.060401
12. O. S. Zozulya, M. Haque, K. Schoutens, and E. H. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 76, 125310 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.125310
13. B. A. Friedman and G. C. Levine, Phys. Rev. B 78, 035320 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.035320
14. A. Hamma, R. Ionicioiu, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Lett. A 337, 22 (2005) 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.01.060
15. A. Hamma, R. Ionicioiu, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 71, 022315 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.022315
16. S. Furukawa and G. Misguich, Phys. Rev. B 75, 214407 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.214407
17. C. Castelnovo and C. Chamon, Phys. Rev. B 76, 174416 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.174416
18. S. Papanikolaou, K. S. Raman, and E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. B 76, 224421 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.224421
19. A. Hamma, W. Zhang, S. Haas, and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. B 77, 155111 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.155111
20. N. Anantharaman and S. Nonnenmacher, Ann. Henri Poincare 8, 37 (2007). 10.1007/s00023-006-0299-z
21. Y. G. Sinai, Funct. Anal. Appl. 2, 61 (1968). 10.1007/BF01075361
22. A measure of phase space which is invariant under a chaotic transformation can sometimes be represented by a probability distribution on the configurations of a spin chain.
23. D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2376 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2376
24. C. L. Henley, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, S891 (2004). 10.1088/0953-8984/16/11/045
25. E. Fradkin and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 050404 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.050404
26. B. Hsu, M. Mulligan, E. Fradkin, and Eun-Ah Kim, Phys. Rev. B 79, 115421 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115421
27. M. A. Metlitski, C. A. Fuertes, and S. Sachdev, arXiv:0904.4477 (unpublished).
28. Here we take a standard notation used in statistical mechanics and field theory, where R=1 for a free fermion and R=2 for a SU(2)-symmetric case. In condensed matter physics, a common notation is Rcm =R/ 4π, and the coupling constant K=1/ R2 known as TLL parameter is also widely used.
29. F. J. Dyson, J. Math. Phys. 3, 140 (1962) 10.1063/1.1703773
30. F. J. Dyson, J. Math. Phys. 3, 157 (1962) 10.1063/1.1703774
31. F. J. Dyson, J. Math. Phys. 3, 166 (1962). 10.1063/1.1703775
32. M. Gaudin, J. Phys. (France) 34, 511 (1973).
33. F. Calogero, J. Math. Phys. 10, 2191 (1969). 10.1063/1.1664820
34. B. Sutherland, J. Math. Phys. 12, 246 (1971). 10.1063/1.1665584
35. L. Campos Venuti, H. Saleur, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. B 79, 092405 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.092405
36. R. Moessner, S. Sondhi, and P. Chandra, Phys. Rev. B 64, 144416 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.144416
37. R. Moessner and S. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1881 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1881
38. G. Misguich, D. Serban, and V. Pasquier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137202 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137202
39. C. Castelnovo, C. Chamon, C. Mudry, and P. Pujol, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 322, 903 (2007). 10.1016/j.aop.2006.04.017
40. E. Ardonne, P. Fendley, and E. Fradkin, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 310, 493 (2004). 10.1016/j.aop.2004.01.004
41. It is interesting to notice that ρΩ (Ω=A,B) is block diagonal in the spin basis, each block being labeled by a spin configuration i at the boundary. Block number i is a card EiΩ ×card EiΩ matrix and has only one nonzero eigenvalue pi, the corresponding eigenvector being | R KiΩ □. In the special case where all the energies EΩ (ω,i) vanish, each state | RK iΩ □ is an equal-amplitude superposition of spin configurations. Then, each block of ρΩ is particularly simple since all its matrix elements are identical. The block labeled by the boundary configuration i, of size card EiΩ ×card EiΩ, has all its entries equal to pi /card EiΩ and a trace equal to pi.
42. Here the factor 2 is inserted because it will be convenient in Sec. when identifying E (i) as a Coulomb gas model. One may also think that the interactions occurring in A and B make a contribution E (i) each and that the total contribution is twice of it.
43. H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.010504
44. F. D. M. Haldane, Talk at KITP Conference, February 2009 (unpublished), http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/lowdim-c09/haldane/
45. The particle coordinates are restricted to be multiple of 2π/L ground-state wave function of the Calogero-Sutherland model.
46. Y.-S. Wu and Y. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 890 (1995). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 75.890
47. F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 635 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 60.635
48. B. S. Shastry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 639 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60. 639
49. W. Nahm, Nucl. Phys. B 124, 121 (1977). 10.1016/0550-3213(77)90280-2
50. J. Polchinski, String Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
51. M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices (Academic Press, San Diego, 1991).
52. A. Schmid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1506 (1983). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1506
53. R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics (Dover, Mineola, 1982).
54. P. W. Kasteleyn, in Fundamental Problems in Statistical Mechanics III, edited by, E. D. G. Cohen, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975), p. 103.
55. T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004).
56. D. C. Cabra, A. Honecker, and P. Pujol, Phys. Rev. B 58, 6241 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.6241
57. N. M. Bogoliubov, A. G. Izergin, and V. E. Korepin, Nucl. Phys. B 275, 687 (1986). 10.1016/0550-3213(86)90579-1
58. S. Qin, M. Fabrizio, L. Yu, M. Oshikawa, and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. B 56, 9766 (1997). 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.9766
59. N. Shannon, G. Misguich, and K. Penc, Phys. Rev. B 69, 220403 (R) (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.220403
60. F. Pollmann, J. J. Betouras, K. Shtengel, and P. Fulde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 170407 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.170407
61. A. Y. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 303, 2 (2003). 10.1016/S0003-4916(02) 00018-0
62. H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. 60, 252 (1941). 10.1103/PhysRev.60.252
63. P. V. Buividovicha and M. I. Polikarpov, Phys. Lett. B 670, 141 (2008). 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.10.032
64. One can recall that at a certain value of R, the sine potential for φ becomes relevant and φ is locked at a constant value, leading to a crystallization. Conversely, a crystal state can be regarded as a φ -locked state.
65. Note that for the dimer models on the square and hexagonal lattices, the radius of φ is given by R=1, not by R=2 used by Hsu (Ref.).
66. V. Petkova and J. Zuber, Proceedings of "Nonperturbative Quantum Field Theoretic Methods and their Applications, " Budapest, Hungary, 14-21 August 2000, edited by, Z. Horvath, and, L. Palla, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), pp. 1-35.
67. H. W. J. Blöte and H. J. Hilhorst, J. Phys. A 15, L631 (1982) 10.1088/0305-4470/15/11/011
68. B. Nienhuis, H. J. Hilhorst, and H. W. J. Blöte, J. Phys. A 17, 3559 (1984). 10.1088/0305-4470/17/18/025
69. J. Kondev and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6628 (1995) 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.6628
70. J. Kondev and C. L. Henley, Nucl. Phys. B 464, 540 (1996) 10.1016/0550-3213(96)00064-8
71. C. Zeng and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. B 55, 14935 (1997) 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.14935
72. R. Raghavan, C. L. Henley, and S. L. Arouh, J. Stat. Phys. 86, 517 (1997). 10.1007/BF02199112
73. F. Alet, Y. Ikhlef, J. L. Jacobsen, G. Misguich, and V. Pasquier, Phys. Rev. E 74, 041124 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.041124