Zero-temperature phase transitions of an antiferromagnetic Ising model of general spin on a triangular lattice

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 55, Issue 22, 1997, Pages 14935-14947

  Zeng, Chen ^a   Henley, Christopher L ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009059263     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.14935     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. G. H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. 79, 357 (1950).
2. (a) H. W. J. Blöte and H. J. Hilhorst, J. Phys. A 15, L631 (1982).
3. (b) B. Nienhuis, H. J. Hilhorst and H. W. Blöte, J. Phys. Aibid. 17, 3559 (1984).
4. W. Zheng and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2704 (1989).
5. L. S. Levitov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 92 (1990).
6. S. Sachdev and N. Read, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4800 (1996).
7. C. L. Henley (unpublished).
8. C. Zeng, A. A. Middleton and Y. Shapir, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3204 (1996).
9. D.A. Huse and A. D. Rutenberg, Phys. Rev. B 45, 7536 (1992).
10. P. Chandra, P. Coleman and I. Ritchey, J. Phys. (France) I 3, 591 (1993).
11. H. W. J. Blöte and B. Nienhuis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1372 (1994).
12. J. Kondev and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2786 (1994).
13. J. Kondev and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6628 (1995).
14. J. Kondev and C. L. Henley, Nucl. Phys. B 464, 540 (1996).
15. R. Raghavan, C. L. Henley, and S.L. Arouh (unpublished).
16. J. K. Burton and C. L. Henley (unpublished).
17. O. Nagai, S. Miyashita and T. Horiguchi, Phys. Rev. B 47, 202 (1993).
18. Y. Honda, A. Lipowski and T. Horiguchi, Phys. Rev. B 52, 13 429 (1995).
19. A. Lipowski, T. Horiguchi and D. Lipowska, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3888 (1995).
20. The limit of S→∞ is well defined and has been simulated by Ref. 30 and by Y. Yamada, S. Miyashita, T. Horiguchi, M. Kang and O. Nagai, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140-144, 1749 (1995). It is interesting as a model which has an infinite number of continuous degrees of freedom (changes of (Formula presented) for loose spins), under which the energy is degenerate; in such systems it is expected that a particular average pattern of order is selected when fluctuations are taken into account, but it is nontrivial to compute the selecting terms of free energy, since the potential minimum is flat rather than quadratic as a function of the spins.
21. S. Miyashita and H. Kawamura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54, 3385 (1985).
22. B. Kleine, E. Müller-Hartmann, K. Frahm and P. Fazekas, Z. Phys. B 87, 103 (1992).
23. Q. Sheng and C. L. Henley, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 4, 2937 (1992).
24. G. Murthy, D. Arovas and A. Auerbach, Phys. Rev. B 55, 3104 (1997).
25. A. Lipowski and T. Horiguchi, J. Phys. A 28, 3371 (1995).
26. T. Ogawa and Y. Nakajima, Prog. Theor. Phys. (Suppl.) 87, 90 (1986), independently identified the height representation, but considered the height as defined modulo 6 (so "roughness" could not have been clearly defined, and the connection to power-law correlations was not evident).
27. J. V. José, L. P. Kadanoff, S. R. Kirkpatrick and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 16, 1217 (1977).
28. It had long been noted that the triangular Ising model could be mapped approximately to a six-state clock model model [see E. Domany, M. Schick, J. S. Walker and R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. B 18, 2209 (1978)], particularly in connection with the effect of adding a second-neighbor ferromagnetic interaction. The height mapping of the microstates is more powerful, in that it shows every excitation must correspond to vortex-antivortex pairs; this is important in predicting the T>0 behavior.
29. H. W. J. Blöte and M. P. Nightingale, Phys. Rev. B 47, 15 046 (1993).
30. J. Stephenson, J. Math. Phys. 5, 1009 (1964).
31. J. Stephenson, J. Math. Phys. 11, 413 (1970).
32. P. Chandra, P. Coleman and L. B. Ioffe, Phys. Rev. B 49, 12 897 (1994) used a height representation to understand the phase diagram of another triangular antiferromagnet; the behavior is reminiscent of the S=∞ limit in our system (discussed in Ref. 18).
33. T. Horiguchi, O. Nagai and S. Miyashita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 1513 (1991).
34. T. Horiguchi, O. Nagai, S. Miyashita, Y. Miyatake and Y. Seo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61, 3114 (1992).
35. H. G. Evertz, M. Hasenbusch, M. Marcu and K. Pinn, Physica A 199, 31 (1993).
36. P. D. Coddington and L. Han, Phys. Rev. B 50, 3058 (1994).
37. G. M. Zhang and C. Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. Bibid. 50, 12 546 (1994).
38. G. G. Batrouni, G. R. Katz, A. S. Kronfeld, G. P. Lepage, B. Svetitsky and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2736 (1985).
39. C. L. Henley, J. Phys. A 21, 1649 (1988).
40. W. Li, H. Park and M. Widom, J. Stat. Phys. 66, 1 (1992).