In vitro comparison of soybean lecithin based-extender with commercially available extender for ram semen cryopreservation

International Journal of Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 149-152

  Sharafi, Mohsen ^a   Forouzanfar, Mohsen ^b   Hosseini, Sayed Morteza ^c   Hajian, Mehdi ^c   Ostadhosseini, Somaye ^c   Hosseini, Laleh ^c   Abedi, Parvaneh ^c   Nili, Nafiseh ^a   Rahmani, Hamid Reza ^a   Javaheri, Ahmad Reza ^d   Esfahani, Mohammad Hossein Nasr ^c  

^a ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c ROYAN INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE   (Iran)

^d Animal Breeding Center   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cryopreservation; Embryo development; Extender; In vitro; Semen

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE;

ACROSOME REACTION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYTE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; CRYOPROTECTION; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FREEZING; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON CAPACITATION; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; THAWING;

EID: 73249125415     PISSN: 2008076X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Graham EF, Carbo BF, Brown KI. Effects of some zwitter ion buffers on the freezing and storage of spermatozoa bull. J Dairy Sci. 1972; 55: 372-378.
2. Larson JM, Mckinney KA, Mixon BA, Burry KA, Wolf DP. An intrauterine insemination-ready cryopreservation method compared with sperm recovery after conventional freezing and post-thaw processing. Fertil Steril. 1997; 143-148.
3. Watson PF. Cooling of spermatozoa and fertility capacity. Reprod Dom Anim. 1999; 31(1): 135-40.
4. Parks JE, Graham JK. Effects of cryopreservation procedures on sperm membranes. Theriogenology. 1992; 38(2): 209-222.
5. Quinn PJ, White IG, Cleland RW. Chemical and ultrastructural change in ram spermatozoa after washing, cold shock and freezing. J Reprod Fertil. 1965; 37: 185-549.
6. Nath J. Correlative biochemical and ultrastructural studies on the mechanism of freezing damage to ram semen. Cryobiology. 1972; 9(4): 240-246.
7. Aires VA, Hinsch KD, Mueller-Schloesser F, Bogner K, Mueller-Schloesser S, Hinsch E. In vitro and in vivo comparison of egg yolk-based and soybean lecithin-based extenders for cryopreservation of bovine semen. Theriogenology. 2003; 60: 269-279.
8. Vishwanath R, Shannon P. Storage of bovine semen in liquid and frozen state. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000; 62: 23-53.
9. Andersen K, Aamdal J, Fougner JA. Intra-uterine and deep cervical insemination with frozen semen in sheep. Zuchthygiene. 1973; 8: 113-8.
10. Olafsson T. Insemination of sheep with frozen semen. Result obtained in a field trial in Norway. Zuchthygiene. 1980; 15: 50-9.
11. Marco-Jimenez F, Puchades S, Moce E, Viudes-de-Carto MP, Vicente Js, Rodrigues M. Use of powdered egg yolk vs fresh egg yolk for the cryopreservation of ovine semen. Reprod Domest Anim. 2004; 39(6): 438-441.
12. Sodrequist L, Lundeheim N, Nilson B. Assessment of fertility after using different procedure to thaw ram spermatozoa frozen in mini-straw. Reprod Dom Anim. 1999; 34: 61-6.
13. Moussa M, Matinet V, Trimeche A, Tainturier D, Anton M. Low density lipoproteins extracted from hen egg yolk by an easy method: cryoprotective effect on frozen-thawed bull semen. Theriogenology. 2002; 57: 1695-1706.
14. Amirat L, Tainturier D, Jeanneau L, Thorin C, Gerard O, Courtens JL, Anton M. Bull semen in vitro fertility after cryopreservation using egg yolk LDL: a comparison with Optidyl®, a commercial egg yolk extender. Theriogenology. 2004; 61: 895-907.
15. Gil J, Rodiguez-Irazoqui M, Lundeheim N, Soderquist L, Rodriguez-Martinez H. Fertility of ram semen frozen in Bioxcell®® and used for cervical artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2003; 59: 1157-1170.
16. Bousseau S, Brillard JP, Guienne M, Guerin B, Camus A, Lechat M. Comparison of Bacteriological qualities of various egg yolk sources and the in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of Bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or lecithin-based diluents. Theriogenology. 1998; 50(5): 699-706.
17. van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw AM, Haring RM, Kaal-Lansbergen LM, den Daas JH. Fertility results using bovine semen cryopreserved with extenders based on egg yolk and soybean extract. Theriogenology. 2000; 54: 57-67.
18. Thun R, Hurtado H, Janett F. Comparison of Biociphos-plus and Tris-egg yolk extender for cryopreservation of bull semen. Theriogenology. 2002; 57: 1087-94.
19. Jeyendran R, Acosta V, Land S, Coulam C. Cryopreservation of human sperm in a lecithin-supplemented freezing medium. Fertil Steril. 2008; 90(4): 1263-1265.
20. Forouzanfar M, Sharafi M, Hosseini SM, Ostadhosseini S, Hajian M, Hosseini L, et al. In vitro Comparison of Egg Yolk and Soybean Lecithin-based Extenders for Cryopreservation of Ram Semen. Theriogenology. A Head of Press.
21. Revell G, Marode RA. An osmotic resistance test for bovine semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 1994; 36: 77-86.
22. Perez LJ, Valcarcel A, de Las Heras MA, Moses DF, Baldassarre H. In vitro capacitation and induction of acrosomal exocytosis in ram spermatozoa as assessed by the chlortetracycline assay. Theriogenology. 1996; 45(5): 1037-1046.
23. Shirazi A. Ostad-hosseini S, Ahmadi E, Heidari B, Shams-Esfandabadi N. In vitro developmental competence of ICSI-derived activated ovine embryo. Theriogenology. 2009; 71(2): 342-348.
24. Parish JJ, Susko-parish, JL, First NL. Effect of heparin and chondroitin sulfate on the acrosome reaction and fertility of bovine sperm in vitro. Theriogenology. 1985; 24(5): 537-549.
25. Hosseini SM, Moulavi F, Hajian M, Abedi P, Forouzanfar M, Ostad-Hosseini S, et al. Highly efficient in vitro production of bovine blastocyst in cell-free sequential synthetic oviductal fluid vs. TCM 199 Vero cell co-culture system. IJFS. 2008; 2: 66-73.
26. Fukui Y, Kohno H, Togari T, Hiwasa M, Okabe K. Fertility after artificial inseminatin using a soybean-based extenders in sheep. J Reprod Dev. 2008; 54: 286-289.
27. Waston PF. The role of lipid and protein in the protection of ram spermatozoa at 5 c by egg yolk lipoprotein. J Reprod Fertil. 1981; 2: 337-40.