A case of inconsistent equatings: How the man with four watches decides what time it is

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 49-62

  Livingston, Samuel A ^a   Antal, Judit ^b  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

^b The College Board   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 73149101634     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08957340903423578     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Dorans, N. J., Pommerich, M., & Holland, P. W. (Eds.). (2007). Linking and aligning test scores and scales. New York: Springer.
2. Dorans, N. J. (Ed.). (2004). Assessing the population sensitivity of equating functions [Special issue]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, 1-68.
3. Holland, P. W., Sinharay, S., von Davier, A. A., & Han, N. (2008). An approach to evaluating the missing data assumptions of the chain and post-stratification equating methods for the NEAT design. Journal of Educational Measurement,45, 17-43.
4. Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
5. Livingston, S. A. (2004). Equating test scores (without IRT). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
6. Sinharay, S., & Holland, P. W. (2007). Is it necessary to make anchor tests mini-versions of the tests being equated or can some restrictions be relaxed? Journal of Educational Measurement, 44, 249-275.
7. Skaggs, G. (2005). Accuracy of random groups equating with very small samples. Journal of Educational Measurement, 42, 309-330.
8. Tong, Y., & Kolen, M. J. (2005). Assessing equating results on different equating criteria. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29, 418-432.
9. von Davier, A. A., Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (2003). The kernel method of test equating. New York: Springer.
10. von Davier, A. A., & Liu, M. (Eds.). (2008). Population invariance [Special issue]. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 9-114.