Accuracy of random groups equating with very small samples

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 309-330

  Skaggs, Gary ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30344465785     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2005.00018.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Hanson, B. A. (1992). Description of a program for smoothing univariate test score distributions. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
2. Hanson, B. A., Zeng, L., & Colton, D. (1994). A comparison of' presmoothing and postsmoothing methods in equipercentile equating (ACT Research Report 94-4). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing, Inc.
3. Harris, D. J. (1993). Practical issues in equating. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.
4. Holland, P. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Test equating. New York: Academic Press.
5. Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1987). Notes on the use of log-linear models for fitting discrete probability distributions (Program Statistics Research Report No. 87-70). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6. IMSL (1997). IMSL STAT/LIBRARY User's Manual, Version 3.0. Visual. Houston, TX: Numerics, Inc.
7. Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. J. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices. New York: Springer.
8. Livingston, S. A. (1993). Small-sample equating with log-linear smoothing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(1), 23-39.
9. Parshall, C. G., Houghton, P. D. B., & Kromrey, J. D. (1995). Equating error and statistical bias in small sample linear equating. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(1), 37-54.