Comparative analysis of peri-implant marginal bone loss based on microthread location: A 1-year prospective study after loading

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 80, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1937-1944

  Song, Dong Wook ^a   Lee, Dong Won ^a   Kim, Chong Kwan ^b   Park, Kwang Ho ^a   Moon, Ik Sang ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Alveolar bone loss; Dental implants; Dental radiography; Prospective studies

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TITANIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA BLEEDING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERIODONTICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PLAQUE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PLAQUE INDEX; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, PARTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GINGIVAL HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 72749118094     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.090330     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
2. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:721-764. (Pubitemid 128736235)
3. Isidor F. Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:1-9.
4. Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titaniumimplants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:186-198.
5. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennström J, Lindhe J. The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:212-219.
6. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-973.
7. Norton MR. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:91-99.
8. Hansson S. Implant-abutment interface: Biomechanical study of flat top versus conical. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:33-41.
9. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC, eds. Clinical Implant Materials: Advances in Biomaterials. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1990;9:309-314.
10. Hansson S. The implant neck: Smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:394-405.
11. Rasmusson L, Kahnberg KE, Tan A. Effects of implant design and surface on bone regeneration and implant stability: An experimental study in the dog mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:2-8.
12. Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Smith BJ. A 5-year prospective study of astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:179-182.
13. Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of micro-thread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: A 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:465-470.
14. Jung YC, Han CH, Lee KW. A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:811-818.
15. Lee DW, Kim CK, Park KH, Cho KS, Moon IS. Noninvasive method to measure the length of soft tissue from the top of the papilla to the crestal bone. J Periodontol 2005;76:1311-1314.
16. Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. Dimension of keratinized mucosa and the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontol 2005b;76:1856-1860.
17. Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. Dimension of interproximal soft tissue between adjacent implants in two distinctive implant systems. J Periodontol 2006;77: 1080-1084.
18. Lee DW, Huh JK, Park KH, Chai JK, Kim CK, Moon IS. Comparison of interproximal soft tissue height for single implants and contra-lateral natural teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1320-1325.
19. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schürch E Jr., Lang NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2:145-151.
20. Wyatt CCL, Bryant SR, Avivi-Arber L, Chaytor DV, Zarb GA. A computer-assisted measurement technique to assess bone proximal to oral implants on intraoral radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 225-229.
21. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, Valiquette N. Dental implant design-effect on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:467-483
22. al-Sayyed A, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, et al. Predictable crestal bone remodelling around two porous-coated titanium alloy dental implant designs. A radiographic study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:131-141.
23. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111.
24. Andersson B. Implants for single-tooth replacement. A clinical and experimental study on the Brånemark CeraOne System. Swed Dent J Suppl 1995;108:1-41.
25. Engquist B, Nilson H, Åstrand P. Single-tooth replacement by osseointegrated Brånemark implants. A retrospective study of 82 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:238-245.
26. Hämmerle CHF, Brägger U, Bürgin W, Lang NP. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:111-119.
27. Malevez CH, Hermans M, Daelemans PH. Marginal bone levels at Brånemark system implants used for single tooth restoration. The influence of implant design and anatomical region. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:162-169.
28. Kinni ME, Hokama SN, Caputo AA. Force transfer by osseointegrated implant devices. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:11-14.
29. Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: Myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73:322-333.
30. Guo XE. Mechanical properties of cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. In: Cowin SC, ed. Bone MechanicsHandbook. BocaRaton, FL:CRCPress; 2001;10:1-23.
31. Puchades-Roman L, Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Howe LC, Ide M, Wilson RF. A clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic comparison of astra tech and Brånemark single tooth implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:78-84.
32. Engquist B, Åstrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Gröndahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: A prospective comparative study of astra tech and Brånemark system implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:30-37.
33. Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:8-18.
34. Teughels W, Assche NV, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:68-81.
35. Cosyn J, Sabzevar MM, De Wilde P, De Rouck T. Twopiece implants with turned versus microtextured collars. J Periodontol 2007;78:1657-1663.
36. Jung RE, Jones AA, Higginbottom FL, et al. The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs. J Periodontol 2008;79:260-270.
37. Cochran DL, Bosshardt DD, Grize L, et al. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2009;80:609-617.