Fermionic multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 16, 2009, Pages

  Corboz, Philippe ^a   Vidal, Guifré ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 72649091684     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.165129     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170201 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.170201
2. T. Maier, M. Jarell, T. Pruschke, and M. H. Hettler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1027 (2005). 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.1027
3. S. Sorella, G. B. Martins, F. Becca, C. Gazza, L. Capriotti, A. Parola, and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 117002 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88. 117002
4. J. F. Corney and P. D. Drummond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 260401 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.260401
5. N. V. Prokof'ev and B. V. Svistunov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2514 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2514
6. J. Hubbard, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 276, 238 (1963). 10.1098/rspa.1963.0204
7. R. M. Noack, S. R. White, and D. J. Scalapino, Europhys. Lett. 30, 163 (1995). 10.1209/0295-5075/30/3/007
8. G. Sierra and M. A. Martin-Delgado, arXiv:cond-mat/9811170 (unpublished).
9. T. Nishino and K. Okunishi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 3066 (1998). 10.1143/JPSJ.67.3066
10. Y. Nishio, N. Maeshima, A. Gendiar, and T. Nishino, arXiv:cond-mat/ 0401115 (unpublished).
11. F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, arXiv:cond-mat/0407066 (unpublished).
12. V. Murg, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 75, 033605 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.033605
13. J. Jordan, R. Orus, G. Vidal, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 250602 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.250602
14. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 110501 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101. 110501
15. Z.-Cheng Gu, M. Levin, and X.-Gang Wen, Phys. Rev. B 78, 205116 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.205116
16. H. C. Jiang, Z. Y. Weng, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 090603 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.090603
17. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 220405 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99. 220405
18. G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 79, 144108 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.144108
19. R. N. C. Pfeifer, G. Evenbly, and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. A 79, 040301 (R) (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.040301
20. V. Giovannetti, S. Montangero, and R. Fazio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 180503 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.180503
21. G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, arXiv:0710.0692 (unpublished).
22. G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, arXiv:0801.2449, New J. Phys. (to be published).
23. L. Cincio, J. Dziarmaga, and M. M. Rams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 240603 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.240603
24. G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180406 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.180406
25. G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, arXiv:0904.3383 (unpublished).
26. M. Aguado and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 070404 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.070404
27. R. König, B. W. Reichardt, and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 79, 195123 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.195123
28. P. Corboz, G. Evenbly, F. Verstraete, and G. Vidal, arXiv:0904.4151 (unpublished).
29. C. V. Kraus, N. Schuch, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, arXiv:0904.4667 (unpublished).
30. P. Corboz (unpublished).
31. Note that the local dimension d of the original lattice, in which the Hamiltonian is defined, is usually smaller than the local dimension χ of a coarse-grained site. In this case the computational cost to compute ascending/descending superoperators and environments for the first layer of the MERA is smaller than for the higher layers.
32. S. Singh, R. Pfeifer, and G. Vidal, arXiv:0907.2994 (unpublished).
33. Note that in some cases a fermionic swap gate can only be absorbed in a later stage of the contraction, i.e., not necessarily at the beginning.
34. L. Tagliacozzo, G. Evenbly, and G. Vidal, arXiv:0903.5017 (unpublished).
35. W. Li, L. Ding, R. Yu, T. Roscilde, and S. Haas, Phys. Rev. B 74, 073103 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.073103
36. N. Ali, S. Haas, and L. Ding (private communication).
37. In this example we study the noninteracting case in order to be able to compare with the exact result. (No exact results are available for the interacting case for large systems). The energy as a function of χ behaves similarly in the interacting case as in the noninteracting case, but with a slower convergence for intermediate interaction strengths V∼1 where the amount of entanglement in the system is large (cf. Fig.).
38. M. M. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010404 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96. 010404
39. D. Gioev and I. Klich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100503 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.100503
40. T. Barthel, M.-C. Chung, and U. Schollwock, Phys. Rev. A 74, 022329 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022329
41. N. Schuch, M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 040501 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.040501
42. A. W. Sandvik and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 220602 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.220602
43. M. Aguado (unpublished).
44. C. Pineda, T. Barthel, and J. Eisert, arXiv:0905.0669 (unpublished).
45. T. Barthel, C. Pineda, and J. Eisert, arXiv:0907.3689 (unpublished).