Tool supported detection and judgment of nonconformance in process execution

2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 312-323

  Zazworka, Nico ^a   Basili, Victor R ^a   Shull, Forrest ^b  

^a Institute of Advanced Computer Science   (United States)

^b Fraunhofer USA Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE DOMAIN; DELIVERY TIME; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; IN-PROCESS; NON-CONFORMANCE; NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS; POTENTIAL RISKS; PROCESS CHARACTERISTICS; PROCESS NON-CONFORMANCE; PROJECT MANAGERS; QUALITY GOALS; SET OF RULES; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LIFE CYCLE; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS;

MODELS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK PERCEPTION; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 72449196648     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ESEM.2009.5315983     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Werth."Lecture Notes on Software Process Improvement" by Laurie Honour Werth, document number CMU/SEI-93-EM-8, copyright 1993 by Carnegie Mellon University. http://www2.umassd.edu/SWPI/curriculummodule/em8. part1.pdf
2. S. Sørumgård. "Verification of Process Conformance in Empirical Studies of Software Development". Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 1997.
3. Marvin V. Zelkowitz and Dolores Wallace. Experimental Models for Software Diagnosis. Technical report NISTR 5889, September 1996.
4. A. Finkelstein, J. Kramer, B. Nuseineh (eds.). Software Process Modeling. John Wiley RSP, 1994.
5. Kellner, M. I. 1988. Representation formalisms for software process modelling. In Proceedings of the 4th international Software Process Workshop on Representing and Enacting the Software Process (Devon, United Kingdom). C. Tully, Ed. ACM, New York, NY, 93-96.
6. Roethlisberger, Fritz J., and W. J. Dickson. Management and the Worker. Harvard University Press, 1939.
7. Quality systems - Model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and servicing. International Organization for Standardization, 1993.
8. Information Technology - Software life cycle processes. International Organization for Standardization, 1995.
9. Lanubile, F. and Visaggio, G., "Evaluating Defect Detection Techniques for Software Requirements Inspections", ISERN Report no. 00-08, 2000.
10. Silva, L.F.S.; Travassos, G.H., "Tool-supported unobtrusive evaluation of software engineering process conformance," Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE '04. Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on, vol., no., pp. 127-135, 19-20 Aug. 2004
11. Johnson, P.M.; Hongbing Kou; Agustin, J.M.; Qin Zhang; Kagawa, A.; Yamashita, T., "Practical automated process and product metric collection and analysis in a classroom setting: lessons learned from Hackystat-UH," Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE '04. Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on, vol., no., pp. 136-144, 19-20 Aug. 2004
12. Lorin Hochstein, Taiga Nakamura, Forrest Shull, Nico Zazworka, Victor R. Basili, Marvin V. Zelkowitz "An Environment for Conducting Families of Software Engineering Experiments", Advances in Computers (ed. by Marvin Zelkowitz), Vol. 74, ElseVier, 2008
13. Cook, J. E. and Wolf, A. L. 1998. Discovering models of software processes from event-based data. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 7, 3 (Jul. 1998), 215-249.
14. Basili, V., Caldiera, G., and Rombach, D. Experience Factory. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering Volume 1:469-476, Marciniak, J. ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1994
15. M. Fowler. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
16. Basili, V. R. 1992 Software Modeling and Measurement: the Goal/Question/Metric Paradigm. Technical Report. University of Maryland at College Park.
17. Nagappan, N.; Ball, T., "Use of relative code churn measures to predict system defect density," Software Engineering, 2005. ICSE 2005. Proceedings. 27th International Conference on, vol., no., pp. 284-292, 15-21 May 2005