Image use within the work task model: Images as information and illustration

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2416-2429

  McCay Peet, Lori ^a   Toms, Elaine ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ATTRIBUTES; SEMI-STRUCTURED; SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS; WORK TASK;

FLUORINE CONTAINING POLYMERS;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 72449190613     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21202     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Angus, E., Thelwall, M., & Stuart, D. (2008). General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr. Online Information Review, 32(1), 89-101. (Pubitemid 351332194)
2. Attfield, S., Blandford, A., & Dowell, J. (2003). Information seeking in the context of writing: A design psychology interpretation of the "problematic situation." Journal of Documentation, 59(4), 430-453.
3. Batley, S. (1988). Visual information retrieval: Browsing strategies in pictorial databases. In Online Information 88, Proceedings of 12th International Online Information Meeting (pp. 373-381). Oxford, UK: Learned Information Limited.
4. Besser, H. (1999). Digital image distribution: A study of costs and uses. D-Lib Magazine, 5(10). Retrieved August 13, 2009 from http://www.dlib.org/
5. Brilliant, R. (1988). How an art historian connects art objects and information. Library Trends, 37(2), 120-129.
6. Byström, K., & Hansen, P. (2005). Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1050-1061. (Pubitemid 41205798)
7. Chen, H. (2001a, February). An analysis of image queries in the field of art history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 260-273. (Pubitemid 33642933)
8. Chen, H. (2001b, September). An analysis of image retrieval tasks in the field of art history. Information Processing & Management, 37(5), 701-720.
9. Choi, Y., & Rasmussen, E.M. (2002). User's relevance criteria in image retrieval in American history. Information Processing and Management, 38(5), 695-726. (Pubitemid 34284403)
10. Choi, Y., & Rasmussen, E.M. (2003). Searching for images: The analysis of users' queries for image retrieval in American history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 498-511.
11. Chu, C.M. (1999). Literary critics at work and their information needs: A research-phases model. Library & Information Science Research, 21(2), 247-273.
12. Chu, H. (2001). Research in image indexing and retrieval as reflected in the literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(12), 1011-1018. (Pubitemid 32936223)
13. Cole, C. (1998). Intelligent information retrieval: Diagnosing information need: Part I. The theoretical framework for developing an intelligent IR tool. Information Processing & Management 34(6), 709-720.
14. Collins, K. (1998). Providing subject access to images: A study of user queries. The American Archivist, 61, 36-55.
15. Cunningham, S.J., Bainbridge, D., & Masoodian, M. (2004). How people describe their image information needs: A grounded theory analysis of visual arts queries. In Proceedings of the 2004 Joint ACM/IEEE Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 47-48). New York: ACM Press.
16. Efthimiadis, E.N., & Fidel, R. (2000). The effect of query type on subject searching behavior of image databases: An exploratory study [Poster session]. In E. Yannakoudakis, N.J. Belkin, M.-K. Leong, & P. Ingwersen (Chairs), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '00) (pp. 328-330). New York: ACM Press.
17. Enser, P. (2008). The evolution of visual information retrieval. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 531-546.
18. Enser, P.G.B., & McGregor, C. (1992). Analysis of visual information retrieval queries (British Library Research and Development Report No. 6104).
19. Fidel, R. (1997). The image retrieval task: Implications for the design and evaluation of image databases. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 3(1), 181-199.
20. Goodrum, A., Rorvig, M.E., Jeong, K.-T., & Suresh, C. (2001). An open source agenda for research linking text and image content features. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 52(11), 948-953.
21. Goodrum, A. & Spink, A. (2001). Image searching on the Excite Web search engine. Information Processing & Management, 37(2), 295-311. (Pubitemid 32196301)
22. Hollink, L., Schreiber, A.T., Wielinga, B.J., & Worring, M. (2004). Classification of user image descriptions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(5), 601-626.
23. Hung, T. (2005). Search moves and tactics for image retrieval in the field of journalism: A pilot study. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, 42(3), 329-346.
24. Jansen, B.J. (2008). Searching for digital images on the web. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 81-101.
25. Jörgensen, C. (1996, October). Indexing images: Testing an image description template. Paper presented at the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Conference (ASIS 1996), Baltimore, MD. Retrieved August 13, 2009 from http://www.asis.org/annual-96/ElectronicProceedings/ jorgensen.html
26. Jörgensen, C. (1998). Attributes of images in describing tasks. Information Processing and Management, 34(2-3), 161-174.
27. Jörgensen, C. (2003). Image retrieval. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
28. Kipp, M.E.I., & Campbell, D.G. (2006, November). Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems: An examination of tagging practices. Paper presented at the 69th Annual General Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Austin, TX.
29. Laine-Hernandez, M., & Westman, S. (2006). Image semantics in the description and categorization of journalistic photographs. In Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T 2006), Austin, TX. Retrieved August 13, 2009, from http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00008122/
30. Lew, M.S., Sebe, N., Djeraba, C., & Jain, R. (2006). Content-based multimedia information retrieval: State of the art and challenges. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP) 2(1), 1-19.
31. Li, J., & Wang, J.Z. (2006). Real-time computerized annotation of pictures. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM 2006) (pp. 911-920). New York: ACM Press.
32. Manjunath, B.S., & Ma, W.Y. (1996). Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 18(8), 837-842.
33. Markkula, M., & Sormunen, E. (2000). End-user searching challenges indexing practices in the digital newspaper photo archive. Information Retrieval, 1(4), 259-285.
34. Ørnager, S. (1995). The newspaper image database: Empirical supported analysis of users' typology and word association clusters. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 212-218). New York: ACM Press.
35. Ørnager, S. (1997). Image retrieval: Theoretical analysis and empirical user studies on accessing information in images. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34, 202-212.
36. Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in the visual arts. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
37. Pu, H.-T. (2005). A comparative analysis of web image and textual queries. Online Information Review, 29(5), 457-467. (Pubitemid 41428363)
38. Pu, H.-T. (2008). An analysis of failed queries for web image retrieval. Journal of Information Science, 34(3), 275-289.
39. Ramsey, M.C., Chen, H., Zhu, B., & Schatz, B.R. (1999). A collection of visual thesauri for browsing large collections of geographic images. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 826-834.
40. Roberts, H.E. (2001). A picture is worth a thousand words: Art indexing in electronic databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 52(11), 911-916.
41. Sandweiss, M. (2007, June). Image and artifact: The photograph as evidence in the digital age. Journal of American History, 94(1), 193-202.
42. Shatford, S. (1986). Analyzing the subject of a picture: A theoretical approach. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 6, 39-61.
43. Shih, P., & Liu, C. (2005). Comparative assessment of content-based face image retrieval in different color spaces. International Journal of Pattern Recognition & Artificial Intelligence, 19(7), 873-893.
44. Svenonius, E. (1994). Access to nonbook materials: The limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 600-606.
45. Toms, E.G., & O'Brien, H.L. (2008). Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e-humanist. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 102-130.
46. Trant, J. (2006). Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums: Proof of concept. New Review of Hypermedia & Multimedia 12(1), 83-105.
47. Vakkari, P. (1999). Tisk complexity, problem structure and information actions: Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 819-837.
48. Wang, J.Z., Grieb, K., Zhang, Y., Chen, C.-C., Chen, Y., & Li, J. (2006). Machine annotation and retrieval for digital imagery of historical materials. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 6(1), 18-29.
49. Westman, S., & Oittinen, P. (2006). Image retrieval by end-users and intermediaries in a journalistic work context. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information Interaction in Context, 176, 102-110. New York: ACM Press.
50. Yu, S., Huang, C., & Zhou, J. (2006). Color image retrieval based on color-texture-edge feature histograms. International Journal of Image & Graphics, 6(4), 583-598.
51. Zhao, R., & Grosky, W.I. (2002). Narrowing the semantic gap: Improved textbased web document retrieval using visual features. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 4(2), 189-200. (Pubitemid 34882774)