An Analysis of Image Queries in the Field of Art History

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 260-273

  Chen, Hsin Iiang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUERIES; IMAGE RETRIEVAL;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0034826126     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1532-2890(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1606>3.0.CO;2-M     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allen, B.L. (1996). Information tasks: Toward a user-centered approach information systems. New York: Academic Press.
2. Aluri, R., Kemp, D.A., & Boll, J.J. (1991). Subject analysis in online catalogs. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
3. Beard, D.V. (1991). Computer human interaction for image information systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(8), 600-608.
4. Besser, H. (1990). Visual access to visual images: The UC Berkeley image experience with electronic databases project. Library Trends, 38(4), 787-789.
5. Besser, H. (1991). Imaging: Fine arts, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(8), 589-596.
6. Brilliant, R. (1988). How an art historian connects art objects and information. Library Trends, 37(2), 120-129.
7. Brown, P., Hidderley, R., Griffin, H., & Rollason, S. (1996). The democratic indexing of images. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 2, 107-121.
8. Cawkell, A.E. (1994). A guide to image processing and picture management. Aldershot, Hampshire (UK): Gower Publishing Limited.
9. Chang, S.K. (1989). Principles of pictorial information systems design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Chang, S., Smith, J.R., Beigi, M., & Benitez, A. (1997). Visual information retrieval from large distributed online repositories. Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 63-71.
11. Chen, H. (1999). An analysis of image queries and image retrieval tasks in the field of art history. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.
12. Chen, H., & Rasmussen, R. (1999). Intellectual access to images. Library Trends 48(2), 291-302.
13. Dervin, B., & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.
14. Dervin, B. (1989). Users as research inventions: how research categories perpetuate inequities. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 216-232.
15. Enser, P.G.B. (1995). Progress in documentation pictorial information retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 51(2), 126-170.
16. Enser, P.G.B., & McGregor, C.G. (1992). Analysis of visual information retrieval queries. Report on Project G16412 to the British Library Research and Development Department. London: British Library.
17. Faloutsos, C., Barber, R., Flickner, M. Hafner, J., Niblack, W., Petkovic, D., & Equitz, M. (1994). Efficient and effective querying by image content. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 3, 231-262.
18. Fidel, R. (1994). User-centered indexing. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 45(8), 572-576.
19. Fidel, R. (1997). The image retrieval task: Implications for the design and evaluation of image databases. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 3, 181-199.
20. Garber, S.R., & Grunes, M.B. (1992). The art of search: A study of art directors. CHI '92, Conference Proceedings on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 157-173.
21. Greenberg, J. (1993). Intellectual control of visual archives: A comparison between the Art and Architecture Thesaurus and the Library of Congress Thesaurus for Graphic Materials. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 16(1), 85-101.
22. Goodrum, A., & Spink, A. (1999). Visual information seeking: A study of image queries on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 36, 665-674.
23. Gudivada, V.N., & Raghavan V.V. (1995). Content-based image retrieval systems. Computer, 29(9), 18-22.
24. Gupta, A., Santini, S., & Jain, R. (1997). In search of information in visual media. Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 35-12.
25. Hastings, S.K. (1995a). An exploratory study of intellectual access to digitized art images. Proceedings of the 16th National Online Meeting (pp. 177-185).
26. Hastings, S.K. (1995b). Query categories in a study of intellectual access to digitized art images. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, October 9-12, 1995, Chicago, IL (pp. 3-8). Medford, NJ: ASIS.
27. Holt, B., & Hartwick, L. (1994a). Retrieving art images by image content: The UC Davis QBIC project. ASLIB-Proceeclings, 46(10), 243-248.
28. Holt, B., & Hartwick, L. (1994b). "Quick, Who Painted Fish?" Searching a picture experience with electronic databases with the QBIC Project at UC Davis. Information Services & Use, 14, 79-90.
29. Jorgensen, C. (1995). Image attributes: An investigation (Indexing systems, retrieval systems, computerized). Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Syracuse University.
30. Jorgensen, C. (1998). Attributes of images in describing tasks. Information Processing & Management, 34(2/3), 161-174.
31. Lancaster, F.W. (1981). Evaluation within the environment of an operating information service. In J. K. Sparck (Ed.), Information retrieval experiment. London: Butterworth and Company.
32. Layne, S.S. (1994). Some issues in the indexing of images. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8), 583-588.
33. Ma, W., & Manjanath, B. (1998). Netra: A toolbox for navigating large image databases. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP97), 1, 568-571.
34. Markey, K. (1984) Interindexer consistency tests: A literature review and report of a test of consistency in indexing visual materials. Library & Information Science Research, 6(2), 155-177.
35. Markey, K. (1988). Access to iconographical research collections. Library Trends, 37(2), 154-174.
36. Petersen, T. (1990). Developing a new thesaurus for art and architecture. Library Trends, 38(4), 644-658.
37. Rasmussen, E.M. (1997). Indexing images. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 169-196.
38. Shatford, S. (1986). Analyzing the subject of a picture: A theoretical approach. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 5(3), 39-61.
39. Tibbo, H.R. (1994). Indexing for the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8), 607-619.
40. Turner, J.M. (1995). Comparing user-assigned terms with indexer-assigned terms for storage and retrieval of moving images: Research results. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, October 9-12, 1995, Chicago, IL (pp. 9-12). Medford, NJ: ASIS.
41. Walker, F.L., & Thomas, G.R. (1990). Access techniques for document image experience with electronic Experience with electronic databases. Library Trends, 38(4), 751-786.
42. Zheng, M. (1999). Metadata elements for object description and representation: A case report from a digitized historical fashion collection project. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(13), 1193-1208.