The effects of source credibility ratings in a cultural heritage information aggregator

WICOW'09 - Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web, Co-located with WWW 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 35-42

  Amin, Alia ^a   Zhang, Junte ^b   Cramer, Henriette ^b   Hardman, Lynda ^a,b   Evers, Vanessa ^b  

^a CWI   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Design; Experimentation; Human factors

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; HUMAN ENGINEERING; WEBSITES;

CREDIBILITY MEASURE; CULTURAL HERITAGE INFORMATION; CULTURAL HERITAGES; EXPERIMENTATION; INFORMATION SOURCES; RELIABILITY OF INFORMATION; SEARCH PERFORMANCE; SOURCE CREDIBILITIES;

COBALT ALLOYS;

EID: 72449188117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1526993.1527003     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. A. Amin, J. van Ossenbruggen, L. Hardman, and A. van Nispen. Understanding cultural heritage experts' information seeking needs. In Proc. JCDL '08, pages 39-47, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
2. D. K. Berlo, J. B. Lemert, and R. J. Mertz. Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources. Public Opin Q, 33(4):563-576, 1970.
3. W. P. Cassidy. Online news credibility: An examination of the perceptions of newspaper journalists. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2):478-498, 2007.
4. T. Chesney. An empirical examination of wikipedia's credibility. First Monday, 11(11), Nov. 2006.
5. J. H. Choi, J. H. Watt, and M. Lynch. Perceptions of news credibility about the war in iraq: Why war opponents perceived the internet as the most credible medium. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(1):209-229, 2006.
6. M. Craigie, B. Loader, R. Burrows, and S. Muncer. Reliability of health information on the internet: An examination of experts' ratings. J Med Internet Res, 4(1):2, Jan 2002.
7. H. Cramer, V. Evers, S. Ramlal, M. Someren, L. Rutledge, N. Stash, L. Aroyo, and B. Wielinga. The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(5):455-496, 2008.
8. W. Duff, B. Craig, and J. Cherry. Historians' use of archival sources: Promises and pitfalls of the digital age. Public Historian, 26(2):7-22, 2004.
9. M. S. Eastin. Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4):0-0, 2001.
10. E. Hyvonen, et al. Culturesampo - finnish cultural heritage collections on the semantic web 2.0. In Proc. of the 1st International Symposium on Digital humanities for Japanese Arts and Cultures (DH-JAC-2009), Ritsumeikan, Kyoto, Japan, March 2009.
11. G. Eysenbach and C. Kohler. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ, 324(7337):573-577, 2002.
12. A. J. Flanagin and M. J. Metzger. The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media Society, 9(2):319-342, 2007.
13. B. J. Fogg and H. Tseng. The elements of computer credibility. In Proc. CHI '99, pp. 80-87, ACM.
14. W. E. Hick. On the rate of gain of information. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4(1):11-26, 1952.
15. T. Hong. The inuence of structural and message features on web site credibility. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 57(1):114-127, 2006.
16. C. Hovland and W. Weiss. The inuence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4):635-650, 1951.
17. S. Kiousis. Public trust or mistrust? perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4(4):381-403, 2001.
18. J. Koenemann and N. J. Belkin. A case for interaction: a study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. Proc. of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 205-212, New York, NY, USA, 1996. ACM.
19. D. A. B. Lindberg and B. L. Humphreys. Medicine and Health on the Internet: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. JAMA, 280(15):1303-1304, 1998.
20. R. Lopes and L. Carriço. On the credibility of wikipedia: an accessibility perspective. In Proc. WICOW '08, pp. 27-34, 2008. ACM.
21. M. J. Metzger, A. J. Flanagin, and L. Zwarun. College student web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Comput. Educ., 41(3):271-290, 2003.
22. V. Murdock and M. Lalmas. Workshop on aggregated search. SIGIR Forum, 42(2):80-83, 2008. ACM.
23. G. Peterson, P. Aslani, and A. K. Williams. How do consumers search for and appraise information on medicines on the internet? a qualitative study using focus groups. J Med Internet Res, 5(4):33, Dec 2003.
24. S. Y. Rieh and D. R. Danielson. Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, pp. 307-364, 2007.
25. G. Schreiber, A. Amin, M. van Assem, V. de Boer, L. Hardman, M. Hildebrand, L. Hollink, Z. Huang, J. van Kersen, M. de Niet, B. Omelayenko, J. van Ossenbruggen, R. Siebes, J. Taekema, J. Wielemaker, and B. Wielinga. Multimedian e-culture demonstrator. In Proc. ISWC 2006, vol. 4273 of LNCS, pages 951-958. Springer, 2006.
26. S. S. Sundar and C. Nass. Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51(1):52-72, 2001.
27. S. Tseng and B. J. Fogg. Credibility and computing technology. Commun. ACM, 42(5):39-44, 1999.
28. Y. Tsfati and J. N. Cappella. Why do people watch news they do not trust? the need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Media Psychology, 7(3):251-271, 2005.
29. B. J. Walther, Z. Wang, and T. Loh. The effect of top-level domains and advertisements on health web site credibility. J Med Internet Res, 6(3), Sep 2004.
30. J. Zhang, K. N. Fachry, and J. Kamps. Access to archival finding aids: Context matters. In Proc. ECDL '08, pages 455-457, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag.