Strategies for digital mammography interpretation in a clinical patient population

International Journal of Cancer

Volumn 125, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 2923-2929

  Van Den Biggelaar, Frank J H M ^a   Kessels, Alphons G H ^a   Van Engelshoven, Jos M A ^a   Flobbe, Karin ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Mammography; Performance; Radiologist; Technologist

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ROC CURVE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 72449150314     PISSN: 00207136     EISSN: 10970215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24632     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Feig SA, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Jackson VP, Kopans DB, Monsees B, Sickles EA, Stelling CB, Zinninger M, Wilcox-Buchalla P. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:29-33. (Pubitemid 28308644)
2. Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 1993;341:973-978 (Pubitemid 23109165)
3. Shapiro S. Screening: assessment of current studies. Cancer 1994; 74:231-238
4. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen HH, Duffy SW, Smart CR, Gad A, Smith RA. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish two-county trial. Cancer 1995;75:2507-2517
5. Collins MJ, Hoffmeister J, Worrell SW. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2006; 27:351-355 (Pubitemid 44067369)
6. Anttinen I, Pamilo M, Soiva M, Roiha M. Double reading of mammography screening films - one radiologist or two? Clin Radiol 1993; 48:414-421
7. Brown J, Bryan S, Warren R. Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms. BMJ 1996;312:809-812 (Pubitemid 26099299)
8. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994;191:241-244 (Pubitemid 24098238)
9. Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J, de Koning HJ. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1162-1170 (Pubitemid 47233066)
10. Pauli R, Hammond S, Cooke J, Ansell J. Comparison of radiographer/ radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening. J Med Screen 1996;3:18-22. (Pubitemid 126736069)
11. Tonita JM, Hillis JP, Lim CH. Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program. Radiology 1999;211:529-533
12. van den Biggelaar FJ, Nelemans PJ, Flobbe K. Performance of radio-graphers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. Breast 2008;17:85-90. (Pubitemid 351228791)
13. Sumkin JH, Klaman HM, Graham M, Ruskauff T, Gennari RC, King JL, Klym AH, Ganott MA, Gur D. Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:253-256 (Pubitemid 36008721)
14. Haiart DC, Henderson J. A comparison of interpretation of screening mammograms by a radiographer, a doctor and a radiologist: results and implications. Br J Clin Pract 1991;45: 43-45
15. Birdwell RL, Bandodkar P, Ikeda DM. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 2005;236:451-457 (Pubitemid 41023425)
16. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D'Orsi C, Berns EA, Cutter G, Hendrick RE, Barlow WE, Elmore JG. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1399-1409 (Pubitemid 46556325)
17. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220:781-786
18. Gromet M. Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: review of 231,221 mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:854-859 (Pubitemid 351571504)
19. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace L. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:185-190 (Pubitemid 38263177)
20. Karssemeijer N, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Groenewoud JH, de Koning HJ, Hendriks JH, Holland R. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003;227:192-200. (Pubitemid 36384199)
21. Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Radiology 2008;246:71-80. (Pubitemid 350305028)
22. Marx C, Malich A, Facius M, Grebenstein U, Sauner D, Pfleiderer SO, Kaiser WA. Are unnecessary follow-up procedures induced by computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in mammography? Comparison of mammographic diagnosis with and without use of CAD. Eur J Radiol 2004;51:66-72. (Pubitemid 38746899)
23. Taylor P, Potts HW. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:798-807.
24. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, Feig SA, Jackson VP, Kopans DB, Linver MN, Mendelson EB, Moss LJ, Sickles EA. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS-mammography, 4th edn. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR), 2003.
25. Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr 2007;96:644-647 (Pubitemid 46653167)
26. Park SH, Goo JM, Jo CH. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: practical review for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 2004;5:11-18 (Pubitemid 38569451)
27. Duijm LE, Guit GL, Zaat JO, Koomen AR, Willebrand D. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer. Br J Cancer 1997;76:377-381 (Pubitemid 27308089)
28. Flobbe K, Bosch AM, Kessels AG, Beets GL, Nelemans PJ, von Meyenfeldt MF, van Engelshoven JM. The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1194-1199 (Pubitemid 36613072)
29. Flobbe K, van der Linden ES, Kessels AG, van Engelshoven JM. Diagnostic value of radiological breast imaging in a non-screening population. Int J Cancer 2001;92:616-618 (Pubitemid 32319438)
30. Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, van de Vijver MJ, van Voorthuisen AE. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology 1999;213:413-422 (Pubitemid 29510587)
31. Zonderland HM, Pope TL, Jr, Nieborg AJ. The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1743-1750 (Pubitemid 39386620)
32. Georgian-Smith D, Moore RH, Halpern E, Yeh ED, Rafferty EA, D'Alessandro HA, Staffa M, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, Kopans DB. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189:1135-1141 (Pubitemid 350033006)
33. Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 2005;237:444-449 (Pubitemid 41507878)
34. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, McGee MA, Gillan MG, Boggis CR, Griffiths PM, Duffy SW. Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. Radiology 2006;241:47-53.
35. Bennett RL, Blanks RG, Moss SM. Does the accuracy of single reading with CAD (computer-aided detection) compare with that of double reading? a review of the literature. Clin Radiol 2006;61:1023-1028
36. Molins E, Macia F, Ferrer F, Maristany MT, Castells X. Association between radiologists' experience and accuracy in interpreting screening mammograms. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:91. (Pubitemid 351678118)
37. Balleyguier C, Kinkel K, Fermanian J, Malan S, Djen G, Taourel P, Helenon O. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist? Eur J Radiol 2005;54:90-96