Publishing today is more difficult than ever

Journal of Organizational Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-3

  Ashkanasy, Neal M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 72449132393     PISSN: 08943796     EISSN: 10991379     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/job.676     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. Ashkanasy, N. M. (2008). Submitting your manuscript. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 263-264.
2. Ashkanasy, N. M. (2009a). Thirty years of shaping a discipline: JOB's most influential papers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 1019-1024.
3. Ashkanasy, N.M. (2009b). JOB is doing OK; but what is ''Impact'', anyway? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 681-683.
4. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. (2009). Continuity and change: Three decades at JOB. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 1-2.
5. Doty, D. H., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374-406.
6. Greenberg, J. (2007). A plea for methodological diversity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 929-931.
7. Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1982). Peer-review practices of psychology journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 187-195.
8. Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232.
9. Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.
10. Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371-384.