Placement and replacement of dental restorations

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 589-592

  Mahmood, Shahid ^a,e   Chohan, A N ^b   Al Jannakh, M ^c   Al Baker, H ^c   Smales, R J ^d  

^a Margalla College of Dentistry   (Pakistan)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^e Punjab Government Housing Society   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Caries; Dental restorations; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

AMALGAM; GLASS IONOMER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTISTRY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; SAUDI ARABIA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH FRACTURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; RETREATMENT;

EID: 7244245656     PISSN: 1022386X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Mahmood S, Smales RJ. Placement of restorations in selected patients from different practice environments. J Pak Dent Assoc 2002; 3: 131-5.
2. Al-Negrish AR. Reasons for placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Jordan. Int Dent J 2001; 51: 109-15.
3. Nuttall NM. General dental service treatment received by frequent and infrequent attenders in Scotland. Br Dent J 1984; 156: 363-6.
4. Davies JA. The relationship between change of dentists and treatment received in the general dental service. Br Dent J 1984; 157: 322-4.
5. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 297-303.
6. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Mjör IA. Influence of the method of funding on the age of failed restorations in general dental practice in the UK. Br Dent J 2002; 193: 699-702.
7. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent 2001: 29: 317-24.
8. Al-Mohammadi SM, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Butler TJ. Caries prevalence in boys aged 2, 4, and 6 years according to socioeconomic status in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25: 184-6.
9. Yea R, Sheiham A. The burden of restorative dental treatment for children in third world countries. Int Dent J 2002; 52: 1-9.
10. Anusavice KJ, Deroff PH, Gray A, Lee RB. Criteria for placement and replacement of dental restorations. Fla Dent J 1988: 59: 30-1.
11. Mount GJ, Ngo H. Minimal intervention: a new concept for operative dentistry. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 527-33.
12. Peters MC, McLean ME. Minimally invasive operative care. I. Minimal intervention and concepts for minimally invasive cavity preparations. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 7-16.
13. Peters MC, McLean ME. Minimally invasive operative care. II. Contemporary techniques and materials: an overview. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 17-31.
14. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida. J Am College Dent 1998; 3: 27-33.
15. Burke FJT, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1999; 30: 234-42.
16. Effects and side-effects of dental restorative materials. NIH Technology Assessment Conference 1991. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 1-144.
17. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 58-63.
18. Deligeorgi V, Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Prim Dent Care 2001; 8: 5-11.
19. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Dental restorations. What type of filling? Effective health care. London: Royal Society Medicine Press, 1999.
20. Al-Kateeb TL, Al-Marsafi A, O'Mullane DM. Caries prevalence and treatment need among children in an Arabian community. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991; 19: 277-80.
21. Wyne A, Darwish S, Adenubi J, Battata S, Khan N. The prevalence and pattern of nursing caries in Saudi preschool children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11: 361-4.
22. Al-Malik MI, Holt RD, Bedi R. Erosion, caries and rampant caries in preschool children in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002; 30: 16-23.
23. Elderton RJ. The prevalence of failure of restorations: a literature review. J Dent 1977; 4: 207-10.
24. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 165-79.
25. Mjör IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 117-23.
26. Soderholm KI, Autonson DE, Fischlweiger W. Correlation between marginal discrepancies at the amalgam tooth interface and recurrent caries. In: Anusavice KJ, (edi). Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Criteria for placement and replacement. Chicago: Quintessence Pub; 1989: 95-108.