Integrating Geospatial Technologies to Examine Urban Land Use Change: A Design Partnership

Journal of Geography

Volumn 108, Issue 4-5, 2009, Pages 186-197

  Bodzin, Alec M ^a   Cirucci, Lori ^b  

^a LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Broughal Middle School   (United States)

Author keywords

Design partnership; Diverse learners; Geospatial technologies; Google Earth; Spatial thinking

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHY EDUCATION; INTERNET; LAND USE CHANGE; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL PLANNING; STUDENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 72149093498     PISSN: 00221341     EISSN: 17526868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221340903344920     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baker, T. R., and Bednarz, S. W., 2003. Lessons learned from reviewing research in GIS education. Journal of Geography, 102 (6):231–233.
2. Barab, S., and Squire, K., 2004. Design-based research:Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of Learning Sciences, 13 (1):1–14.
3. Bednarz, S. W., 2004. Geographic information systems:A tool to support geography and environmental education?. GeoJournal, 60 (2):191–199.
4. Bednarz, S. W., 2003. Nine years on:Examining implementation of the National Geography Standards. Journal of Geography, 102 (3):99–109.
5. Bednarz, S. W., Acheson, G., and Bednarz, R. S., 2006. Maps and map learning in social studies. Social Education, 70 (7):398–404.
6. Bednarz, S. W., and Butler, D. R., 1999. “Mission geography” and the use of satellite imagery in K–12 geographic education—A NASA–GENIP partnership. Geocarto International, 14 (4):85–90.
7. Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M., and Linn, M. C., 2004. “ Design-based research in education ”. In Internet Environments for Science Education, Edited by:Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., and Bell, P., 73–85. Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Bodzin, A., and Anastasio, D., 2006. Using Web-based GIS for Earth and environmental systems education. The Journal of Geoscience Education, 54 (3):295–300.
9. Bodzin, A., and Shive, L., 2004. Watershed investigations. Science Scope, 27 (7):21–23.
10. Butler, D., 2006. The web-wide world. Nature, 439 (7104):776–778.
11. Carrarra, A., and Fausto, G., eds. 1995. Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards, Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., di Sessa, A., Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L., 2003. Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32 (1):9–13.
13. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., and Ball, D. L., 2002. “ Resources, instruction, and research ”. In Evidence Matters:Randomized Trials in Education Research, Edited by:Boruch, T., and Mosteller, F., 30–119. Washington, D.C.:Brookings Institute.
14. Collins, A., Joseph, D., and Bielaczyc, K., 2004. Design research:Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1):15–42.
15. Earth's Resources Observations and Science Center. 2007. EarthShots:Satellite images of environmental change, Reston, Virginia:U.S. Department of the Interior and the U.S. Geological Survey. http://edcwww.cr.usgs.gov/earthshots/slow/tableofcontents(accessed September 1, 2009)
16. Environmental Initiative at Lehigh University. 2009. Earth system science education at Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania:Lehigh University. http://www.ei.lehigh.edu/esse/(accessed September 1, 2009)
17. Environmental Initiative at Lehigh University. 2008. Environmental Initiative at Lehigh University home page, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania:Lehigh University. http://www.ei.lehigh.edu/(accessed September 1, 2009)
18. Fermann, E. J., Google Earth-based lessons and lab activities for Earth science classes. Poster presented at the 2006 Geological Society of America annual meeting. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
19. Gersmehl, P. J., and Gersmehl, C. A., 2006. Wanted:A concise list of neurologically defensible and assessable spatial thinking skills. Research in Geographic Education, 8:5–38.
20. Geography Education National Implementation Project. 2002. Mission Geography, College Station, Texas:Texas A&M University. http://missiongeography.org/(accessed September 1, 2009)
21. Geography Education Standards Project. 1994. Geography for Life:National Geography Standards, Washington, D.C.:National Geographic Society.
22. Heit, M., Shortried, A., and Parker, H. D., eds. 1991. GIS Applications in Natural Resources, Fort Collins, Colorado:GIS World.
23. Huber, T. P., 1983. Remote sensing in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 14 (3):33–36.
24. International Society for Technology in Education. 2000. National Educational Technology Standards for Students:Connecting Curriculum and Technology, Eugene, Oregon:International Society for Technology in Education.
25. Kame'enui, E. J., and Simmons, D. C., 1998. Effective Teaching Strategies that Accommodate Diverse Learners, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
26. Kerski, J., 2003. The implementation and effectiveness of Geographic Information Systems technology and methods in secondary education. Journal of Geography, 102 (3):128–137.
27. Kirman, J. M., and Nyitrai, L., 1998. The ability of sixth grade children to use Radarsat satellite images. Journal of Geography, 97 (2):56–62.
28. Klagges, H., Harbor, J., and Shepardson, D., 2002. Teachers as learners examine land-use change in the local environment using remote sensing imagery. Journal of Geography, 101 (4):137–143.
29. Laymon, C., 2003. Satellite remote sensing of land use change. Directions Magazine, http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article_id=365(accessed May 1, 2007)
30. Loston, A. W., Steffen, P. L., and McGee, S., 2005. NASA education:Using inquiry in the classroom so that students see learning in a whole new light. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14 (2):147–156.
31. McLaughlin, M. W., and Mitra, D., 2001. Theory-based change and change-based theory:Going deeper, going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2 (4):301–323.
32. Meyer, J., Butterick, J., Olin, M., and Zack, G., 1999. GIS in the K–12 curriculum:A cautionary note. The Professional Geographer, 51 (4):571–578.
33. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio. 2006. Urban growth seen from space, Greenbelt, Maryland:NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/stories/AAAS/(accessed September 1, 2009)
34. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2009. NASA educational resources, Washington, DC:NASA. http://education.nasa.gov(accessed September 1, 2009)
35. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2002. NASA's El Niño Southern Oscillation project, Greenbelt, Maryland:NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. http://education.gsfc.nasa.gov/ESSSProject/NewLessons/hydrosphere/ENSO/(accessed September 1, 2009)
36. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Computational and Information Systems Laboratory. 2009. National Science Digital Library. Digital Library of Earth Systems Science Education, Boulder, Colorado:University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. http://www.dlese.org(accessed September 1, 2009)
37. National Research Council. 2006. Learning to think spatially:GIS as a support system in K–12 education, Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press.
38. National Research Council. 1996. The National Science Education Standards, Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press.
39. North American Association for Environmental Education. 2000. Excellence in Environmental Education—Guidelines for Learning (K–12), Rock Springs, Georgia:North American Association for Environmental Education.
40. Patterson, M. W., Reeve, K., and Page, D., 2003. Integrating Geographic Information Systems into the secondary curricula. Journal of Geography, 102 (6):275–281.
41. Shear, L., Bell, P., and Linn, M. C., 2004. “ Partnership models:The case of the deformed frogs ”. In Internet environments for science education, Edited by:Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., and Bell, P., 289–314. Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
42. Stahley, T., 2006. Earth from above. The Science Teacher, 73 (7):44–48.