Development of a method for rating nasal appearance after cleft lip repair

Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

Volumn 62, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1437-1441

  He, Xing ^a   Shi, Bing ^a,c   Kamdar, Mehul ^b   Zheng, Qian ^a,c   Li, Sheng ^a   Wang, Yan ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Department of Orthopaedic Surgery   (United States)

^c SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cleft lip; Nasal appearance; Rating method; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ESTHETICS; EVALUATION RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; SENSIBILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP; UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP AND PALATE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CLEFT LIP; COHORT STUDIES; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOSE; PHOTOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROBABILITY; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 72049133436     PISSN: 17486815     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.05.018     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Sundine M.J., and Phillips J.H. Treatment of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity. J Craniofac Surg 15 (2004) 69-76 [discussion 76-77]
2. Lindsay W.K., and Farkas L.G. The use of anthropometry in assessing the cleft-lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 49 (1972) 287-293
3. Peck S., Peck L., and Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod 61 (1991) 43-47
4. Whittle J. Preoperative anthropometric analysis of the cleft children's face: a comparison between groups. Int J Surg 2 (2004) 91-95
5. Farkas L.G., Hajnis K., and Posnick J. Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 30 (1993) 1-12
6. Johnson N., and Sandy J. An aesthetic index for evaluation of cleft repair. Eur J Orthod 25 (2003) 243-249
7. Williams H.B. A method of assessing cleft lip repair: comparison of LeMesurier and Millard techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 41 (1968) 103-107
8. Rullo R., Carinic F., Mazzarella N., et al. Delaire's cheilorhinoplasty: unilateral cleft aesthetic outcome scored according to the Eurocleft guidelines. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70 (2006) 463-468
9. Tobiasen J.M., Hiebert J.M., and Boraz R.A. Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 28 (1991) 419-425
10. Asher-McDade C., Roberts C., Shaw W.C., et al. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 28 (1991) 385-391
11. Zhou Z.B., Sun Y.G., and Luo Y. Comparison of three methods of assessment of cleft lip and nose deformity. J Modern Stomatol 19 (2005) 139-141
12. Roberts-Harry D.P., Hathorn I.S., and Stephens C.D. The ranking of facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 14 (1992) 483-488
13. Kane A.A., Pilgram T.K., Moshiri M., et al. Long-term outcome of cleft lip nasal reconstruction in childhood. Plast Reconstr Surg 105 (2000) 1600-1608
14. Thomson H.G., and Reinders F.X. A long-term appraisal of the unilateral complete cleft lip repair: one surgery's experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 96 (1995) 549-563
15. Russell K.A., Waldman S.D., Tompson B., et al. Nasal morphology and shape parameters as predictors of nasal esthetics in individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38 (2001) 476-485
16. Asher-McDade C., Brattstrom V., Dahl E., et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 4: assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29 (1992) 409-412
17. Morrant D.G., and Shaw W.C. Use of standardized video recordings to assess cleft surgery outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 33 (1996) 134-142