Long-term outcome of cleft lip nasal reconstruction in childhood

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 105, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 1600-1608

  Kane, Alex A ^b   Pilgram, Thomas K ^b   Moshiri, Mazyar ^b   Marsh, Jeffrey L ^a  

^a Cleft Palate Craniofacial D   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FACIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGEON; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNILATERAL CLEFT LIP;

EID: 0034026285     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200004050-00002     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Stark, R. B. The pathogenesis of harelip and cleft palate. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 13: 20, 1954.
2. Millard, D. R., Jr. Cleft Craft: The Evolution of Its Surgery. I. The Unilateral Deformity. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976.
3. Boyne, P. J., and Sands, N. R. Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts. J. Oral Surg. 30: 87, 1972.
4. Rees, T. D. Current concepts of rhinoplasty. Clin. Plast. Surg. 4: 131, 1977.
5. Farkas, L. G., Deutsch, C. K., and Hreczko, T. A. Asymmetries in nostrils and the surrounding tissues of the soft nose: A morphometric study. Ann. Plast. Surg. 12: 10, 1984.
6. Tobiasen, J. M., and Hiebert, J. M. Facial impairment scales for clefts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 93: 31, 1994.
7. Tobiasen, J. M. Scaling facial impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 26: 249, 1989.
8. Dalston, R. M., Warren, D. W., and Dalston, E. T. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 28: 184, 1991.
9. Hardin, M. A., Van Demark, D. R., Morris, H. L., and Payne, M. M. Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 29: 346, 1992.
10. Strauss, R. P., and Broder, H. Interdisciplinary team care of cleft lip and palate: Social and psychological aspects. Clin. Plast. Surg. 12: 543, 1985.
11. Tobiasen, J. M., and Hiebert, J. M. Combined effects of severity of cleft impairment and facial attractiveness on social perception: An experimental study. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 30: 82, 1993.
12. Tobiasen, J. M., Hiebert, J. M., and Boraz, R. A. Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 28: 419, 1991.
13. Tobiasen, J. M. Social judgments of facial deformity. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 24: 323, 1987.
14. Tobiasen, J. M. Psychosocial correlates of congenital facial clefts: A conceptualization and model. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 21: 131, 1984.
15. Berry, D. S., and McArthur, L. Z. Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychol. Bull. 100: 3, 1986.
16. Sussman, S., and Mueser, K. T. Age, socioeconomic status, severity of mental disorder, and chronicity as predictors of physical attractiveness. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 92: 255, 1983.