Influence of pH and operation variables on biogenic amines nanofiltration

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 424-428

  Sabate J ^a   Pujola M ^a   Labanda, J ^b   Llorens, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Amines; Biogenic; Membrane; Nanofiltration; Separation

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CHARGE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; PH; SEPARATION;

BIOGENIC AMINES; ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION; FERMENTED FOODS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUT-OFF (MWCO); OPERATION VARIABLES; ORGANIC MEMBRANE; SOLUTE REJECTION;

AMINES;

EID: 36248957106     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Silla-Santos M.H. Biogenic amines: their importance in foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 29 (1996) 213-231
2. 4 removal. Sep. Purif. Tech. 47 (2006) 162-172
3. Garba Y., Taha S., Cabon J., and Dorange G. Modeling of cadmium salts rejection through a nanofiltration membrane: relationships between solute concentration and transport parameters. J. Membr. Sci. 211 (2003) 51-58
4. Ortega L.M., Lebrun R., Noel I.M., and Hausler R. Application of nanofiltration in the recovery of chromium (III) from tannery effluents. Sep. Purif. Tech. 44 (2005) 45-52
5. Oh J.I., Lee S.H., and Yamamoto K. Relationship between molar volume and rejection of arsenic species in groundwater by low-pressure nanofiltration process. J. Membr. Sci. 234 (2004) 167-175
6. Schaep J., Van der Bruggen B., Uytterthoeven S., Croux R., Vandecasteele C., Wilms D., Van Houtte E., and Vanlerberghe F. Removal of hardness from groundwater by nanofiltration. Desalination 119 (1998) 295-302
7. Kang S.H., and Chang Y.K. Removal of organic acid salts from simulated fermented broth containing succinate by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 246 (2006) 49-57
8. Schaep J., Vandecasteele C., Leysen R., and Doyen W. Salt retention of Zirfon membranes. Sep. Purif. Tech. 14 (1998) 127-131
9. Xu Y., and Lebrun R.E. Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane: effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type. J. Membr. Sci. 158 (1999) 93-104
10. Tsuru T., Shutou T., Nakao S., and Kimura S. Peptide and amino acid separation with nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 29 (1994) 971-984
11. Grib H., Persin M., Gavach C., Piron D.L., Sandeaux J., and Mameri N. Amino acid retention with alumina g nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 172 (2000) 9-17
12. Timmer J.M.K., Speelmans M.P.J., and van der Horst H.C. Separation of amino acids by nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Tech. 14 (1998) 133-144
13. Wang X.L., Ying A.L., and Wang W.N. Nanofiltration of l-phenylalanine and l-aspartic acid aqueous solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 196 (2002) 59-67
14. Garem A., Daufin G., Maubois J.L., and Leonil J. Selective separation of amino acids with a charged inorganic nanofiltration membrane: effect of physicochemical parameters on selectivity. Biotecnol. Bioeng. 54 (1997) 291-302
15. Garem A., Daufin G., Maubois J.L., Chaufer B., and Leonil J. Ionic interactions in nanofiltration of β-casein peptides. Biotecnol. Bioeng. 57 (1998) 109-117
16. Wang K.Y., and Chung T.S. The characterization of flat composite nanofiltration membranes and their applications in the separation of Cephalexin. J. Membr. Sci. 247 (2005) 37-50
17. Perrin D.D. Dissociation Constants of Organic Bases in Aqueous Solution (1965), Butterworths, London
18. Koschuh W., Thang V.H., Krasteva S., Novalin S., and Kulbe K.D. Flux and retention behavior of nanofiltration and fine ultrafiltration membranes in filtrating juice from a green biorefinery: a membrane screening. J. Membr. Sci. 261 (2005) 121-128
19. de Lint W.B.S., and Benes N.E. Predictive charge-regulation transport model for nanofiltration from the theory of irreversible processes. J. Membr. Sci. 243 (2004) 365-377
20. Labbez C., Fievet P., Thomas F., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., and Pagetti P. Evaluation of the "DSPM" model on a titania membrane: measurements of charged and uncharged solute retention, electrokinetic charge, pore size, and water permeability. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 262 (2003) 200-211
21. Childress A., and Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 3710-3716
22. Bandini S., Drei J., and Vezzani D. The role of pH and concentration on the ion rejection in polyamide nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 264 (2005) 65-74
23. Qin J.J., Oo M.H., Lee H., and Coniglio B. Effect of feed pH on permeate pH and ion rejection under acidic conditions in NF process. J. Membr. Sci. 232 (2004) 153-159
24. Tanninen J., and Nystrom M. Separation of ions in acidic conditions using NF. Desalination 147 (2002) 295-299