Real-time forecasting following a damaging earthquake

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 36, Issue 21, 2009, Pages

  Marzocchi, Warner ^a   Lombardi, Anna Maria ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI GEOFISICA E VULCANOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIVIL PROTECTION; DECISION SUPPORTS; EARTHQUAKE FORECAST; EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDES; POWER LAW DECAY; PROBABILISTIC FORECASTS; REAL-TIME FORECASTING; SPACE AND TIME;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ELECTRIC LOAD FORECASTING; EXPERIMENTS; STOCHASTIC MODELS;

EARTHQUAKES;

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; FORECASTING METHOD; MORTALITY; POWER LAW; REAL TIME; STOCHASTICITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

AQUILA;

EID: 72049101602     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2009GL040233     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Console, R., M. Murru, and A. M. Lombardi (2003), Refining earthquake clustering models, J. Geophys. Res., 108(B10), 2468, doi:10.1029/ 2002JB002130.
2. Field, E. H. (2007), Overview of the Working Group for the development of regional earthquake likelihood models (RELM), Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 7-16.
3. Gerstenberger, M., S. Wiemer, L. M. Jones, and P. A. Reasenberg (2005), Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California, Nature, 435, 328-331. (Pubitemid 40745540)
4. Helmstetter, A., Y. Y. Kagan, and D. D. Jackson (2006), Comparison of short-term and time-independent earthquake forecast models for southern California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96, 90-106. (Pubitemid 43292767)
5. Jolliffe, I. T., and D. B. Stephenson (2003), Forecast Verification, J. Wiley, Chichester, U. K.
6. Jordan, T. H. (2006), Earthquake predictability, brick by brick, Seismol. Res. Lett., 77, 3-6.
7. Kagan, Y. Y., and D. D. Jackson (2000), Probabilistic forecasting of earth-quakes, Geophys. J. Int., 143, 438-453.
8. Lombardi, A. M., and W. Marzocchi (2009), Double branching model to forecast the next M ≥ 5.5 earthquakes in Italy, Tectonophysics, 475, 514-523, doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2009.06.014.
9. Marzocchi, W., and A. M. Lombardi (2008), A double branching model for earthquake occurrence, J. Geophys. Res., 113, B08317, doi:10.1029/ 2007JB005472.
10. Marzocchi, W., and G. Woo (2007), Probabilistic eruption forecasting and the call for an evacuation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L22310, doi:10.1029/ 2007GL031922. (Pubitemid 351222792)
11. Marzocchi, W., and G. Woo (2009), Principles of volcanic risk metrics: Theory and the case study of Mount Vesuvius and Campi Flegrei, Italy, J. Geophys. Res., 114, B03213, doi:10.1029/2008JB005908.
12. Ogata, Y. (1988), Statisticals models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 83, 9-27.
13. Ogata, Y. (1998), Space-time point-process models for earthquake occurrences, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 50, 379-402.
14. Reasenberg, P. A., and L. M. Jones (1994), Earthquake aftershocks: Update, Science, 265, 1251-1525.
15. Schorlemmer, D., M. Gerstenberger, S. Wiemer, D. D. Jackson, and D. A. Rhoades (2007), Earthquake likelihood model testing, Seismol. Res. Lett., 78, 17-29.
16. Viscusi, W. K. (1992), Fatal Tradeoffs: Public and Private Responsibilities for Risk, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
17. Zhuang, J., Y. Ogata, and D. Vere-Jones (2002), Stochastic declustering of space-time earthquake occurrences, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 97, 369-380.