In vivo kinematics and kinetics of a bi-cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty: A combined fluoroscopic and gait analysis study

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1569-1575

  Catani, Fabio ^a,b   Ensini, Andrea ^a   Belvedere, Claudio ^b   Feliciangeli, Alessandro ^a   Benedetti, Maria Grazia ^b   Leardini, Alberto ^b   Giannini, Sandro ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bi cruciate substituting; Fluoroscopy; Gait analysis; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BICRUCIATE SUBSTITUTING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; CLIMBING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; FOLLOW UP; GAIT; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; JOINT; KINEMATICS; KINETICS; KNEE CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LEG; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; SITTING; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WALKING;

ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; GAIT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 72049086492     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20941     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. McClelland JA, Webster KE, Feller JA. 2007. Gait analysis of patients following total knee replacement: a systematic review. Knee 14:253-263.
2. Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, et al. 2002. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:1049-1054.
3. Banks SA, Fregly BJ, Boniforti F, et al. 2005. Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:551-556. (Pubitemid 41426223)
4. Moro-oka TA, Muenchinger M, Canciani JP, et al. 2007. Comparing in vivo kinematics of anterior cruciate-retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:93-99.
5. Hollinghurst D, Stoney J, Ward T, et al. 2007. In vivo sagittal plane kinematics of the Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:117-123.
6. Banks S, Bellemans J, Nozaki H, et al. 2003. Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:131-138. (Pubitemid 36538555)
7. Banks SA, Hodge WA. 2004. Design and activity dependence of kinematics in fixed and mobile-bearing knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 19:809-816.
8. Bellemans J, Banks S, Victor J, et al. 2002. Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 84:50-53.
9. Fantozzi S, Catani F, Ensini A, et al. 2006. Femoral rollback of cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements: in vivo fluoroscopic analysis during activities of daily living. J Orthop Res 24:2222-2229. (Pubitemid 46017197)
10. Nozaki H, Banks SA, Suguro T, et al. 2002. Observations of femoral rollback in cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:308-314. (Pubitemid 35351085)
11. Ries MD. 2007. Effect of ACL sacrifice, retention, or substitution on kinematics after TKA. Orthopedics 30:74-76.
12. Victor J, Bellemans J. 2006. Physiologic kinematics as a concept for better flexion in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:53-58. (Pubitemid 44690642)
13. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, et al. 2003. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:37-57. (Pubitemid 37413617)
14. Leardini A, Chiari L, Della Croce U, et al. 2005. A human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait Posture 21:212-225.
15. Andriacchi TP, Hurwitz DE. 1997. Gait biomechanics and total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 10:255-260.
16. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW. 1982. The influence of total knee-replacement design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:1328-1335.
17. Gandhi R, de Beer J, Leone J, et al. 2006. Predictive risk factors for stiff knees in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:46-52. (Pubitemid 43162984)
18. Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Mahfouz M. 2003. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:69-81.
19. Victor J, Ries M, Bellemans J, et al. 2007. High-flexion, motion-guided total knee arthroplasty: who benefits the most? Orthopedics 30:77-79.
20. Victor J, Bellemans J. 2006. Physiologic kinematics as a concept for better flexion in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:53-58. (Pubitemid 44690642)
21. Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A, et al. 2008. Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 90:765-771.
22. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, et al. 1989. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13-14.
23. Banks SA, Hodge WA. 1996. Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 43:638-649. (Pubitemid 26158677)
24. Grood ES, Suntay WJ. 1983. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105:136-144.
25. Leardini A, Sawacha Z, Paolini G, et al. 2007. A new anatomically based protocol for gait analysis in children. Gait Posture 26:560-571. (Pubitemid 47432849)
26. Cappozzo A, Catani F, Croce UD, et al. 1995. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech 10:171-178.
27. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, et al. 2002. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion. J Biomech 35:543-548.
28. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. 2000. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82:1189-1195.
29. Moro-oka TA, Hamai S, Miura H, et al. 2008. Dynamic activity dependence of in vivo normal knee kinematics. J Orthop Res 26:428-434.
30. Sharma A, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, et al. 2007. High-flexion TKA designs: what are their in vivo contact mechanics? Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:117-126.
31. Cates HE, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, et al. 2008. In vivo comparison of knee kinematics for subjects having either a posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining high-flexion total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:1057-1067.
32. Banks SA, Hodge WA. 2004. Implant design affects knee arthroplasty kinematics during stair-stepping. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:187-193.
33. Simon SR, Trieshmann HW, Burdett RG, et al. 1983. Quantitative gait analysis after total knee arthroplasty for monarticular degenerative arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65:605-613.
34. Garling EH, Wolterbeek N, Velzeboer S, et al. 2008. Cocontraction in RA patients with a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis during a step-up task. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:734-740.
35. Benedetti MG, Catani F, Bilotta TW, et al. 2003. Muscle activation pattern and gait biomechanics after total knee replacement. Clin Biomech 18:871-876. (Pubitemid 37188459)