The keys for ICT integration in K-12 education: Teachers' perceptions and usage;Bilişim teknolojilerinin ilköǧretim ve ortaöǧretim ile bütünleştirilmesindeki anahtarlar: Öǧretmenlerin algilari ve kullanimlari

Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi

Volumn , Issue 34, 2008, Pages 127-139

  Göktaş, Yüksel ^a   Yildirim, Zahide ^b   Yildirim, Soner ^b  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

ICT perceptions; ICT usage; K 12 teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 71849088611     PISSN: 13005340     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aşkar, P., & Usluel, Y. K. (2002). Teknolojinin yayilim sürecinde öǧretmenlerin bilgisayarin özelliklerine ilişkin algilari. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 14-20.
2. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in classroom. Harvard University Press.
3. Çelik, H. C., & Bindak, R. (2005). Ilköǧretim okullannda görev yapan öǧretmenlerin bilgisayara yönelik tutumlarinin çeşitli deǧişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Inönü Üniversitesi Eǧitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(10), 27-38.
4. Deniz, L. (2005). Ilköǧretim okullarinda görev yapan sinif ve alan öǧretmenlerinin bilgisayar tutumlari. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - (TOJET), 4(4), Article:22. Retrieved February, 2007, from http://www.tojet.net/articles/4422.htm
5. Erkan, S. (2004). Öǧretmenlerin bilgisayara yönelik tutumlari üzerine bir inceleme. Manas Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(12).
6. Göktaş, Y., & Yildirim, Z. (2007). ICT Integration in primary education and teacher education programs in Turkey and in EU Countries. Education and Science, 32(143), 55-67.
7. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D., & Smaldino, S.S. (2002). Instructional media and technologies for learning. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
8. International Society for Technology and Education (ISTE). (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Eugene, Oregon: International Society for Technology and Education.
9. Koc, M. (2005). Questioning technology use in educational reform: From ideological, theoretical and practical perspectives. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2), 72-81. Retrieved February 2006, from http://pppjj.usm.my/mojit
10. Kozma, R. (2002). ICT and educational reform in developed and developing countries. Center for Technology in Learning, CA: SRI International.
11. Kraut, R., Lundmark, W., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist 53(9), 1017-1031.
12. Lai, K. W. (2002). Role of the Teacher. In H. Adelsberger, B. Collis & J. Pawlowski (Eds), Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training (pp.343-354). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13. LaRose, R., Eastin, M. S., & Gregg, J. (2001). Reformulating the Internet paradox: Social cognitive explanations of Internet use and depression. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(2), Retrieved September, 2006, from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n2/paradox.html
14. Lever-Duffy, J., McDonald, J., & Mizell, A. (2003). Teaching and learning with technology. Boston: Pearson Education.
15. nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
16. MirandaNet. (2000). Teachers as innovators: An evaluation of the motivation of teachers to use ICT. Preston, Cox & Cox.
17. MoNE. (2001). National education at the beginning of 2002. Republic of Turkey MoNE Research, Planning and Coordination Board. Retrieved December, 2005, from http://www.meb.gov.tr
18. MoNE. (2004). Milli eǧitim sayisal veriler 2003 - 2004. Milli Eǧitim Bakanliǧi Arastirma, Planlama ve Koordinasyon Kurulu Baskanliǧi, Ankara:MEB Yayimlar Dairesi Baskanliǧi.
19. Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society.
20. Orhun, E. (2000). Türkiye'de eǧitimde bilisim teknolojileri yeniliǧi: Izmir'de bazi okullarda yapilan bir araştirma. Ankara: Turkiye Bilişim Derneǧi Yayinlari.
21. Özoǧul, G. (2002). A qualitative assessment of a technology training course offered to pre-service English language teachers: A case study. Unpublished Master Thesis, METU, Ankara, Turkey.
22. Queitzsch, M. (1997). The Northwest regional profile: Integration of technology in preservice teacher education programs. Northeast Educational Technology Consortium: Retrieved January, 2005, from http://www.netc.org/ preservice/challenge.html
23. nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
24. Schiller, J. (2003) Working with ICT: Perceptions of Australian principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 171-185.
25. Schware, R., & Jaramillo, A. (2004). Technology in education: the Turkish Experiment. The World Bank Report, retreived October, 2004 from http://www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/technet/turk-ed.htm.
26. Scottish Executive. (2002). Interchange 79 connecting schools, libraries and community education centres with ICT: An evaluation of the CREATIS project. Edingurg: Scottish Executive Education Department.
27. South Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium (SCRTEC). (1998). Technology and preservice teacher education program survey. Texas: South Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium.
28. South East and Islands Regional Technology in Education Consortium (SEIRTEC). (1998).Integration of technology in preservice teacher education programs. Atlanta: South East and Islands Regional Technology in Education Consortium.
29. SEIRTEC. (1999). Educational software use: results of a 1999 regional survey. Atlanta: South East and Islands Regional Technology in Education Consortium.
30. Smith, T. C. (2002). An analysis of teacher educators and technology integration projects at four universities. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, Arizona State University. UMI:3043832
31. Sugar, W. (2002). Applying human-centered design to technology integration three alternative technology perspectives. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(1), 12-17.
32. United States Department of Education (USDE). (2000). Teachers' tools for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Education · Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
33. Wellman, B., Quan-Hasse, A., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital?: Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist 45(3), 436-455.
34. Williams, D., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., Tuson, J., & Coles, L. (1998). Teachers' ICT skills and knowledge needs. (Final Report to SOEID). Aberdeen: The Robert Gordon University.
35. Zayim, N. (2004). Instructional technology adoption of medical school faculty in teaching and learning: Faculty characteristics and differentiating factors in adopter categories. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, METU, Ankara, Turkey.