Predictive factors for breast cancer in patients diagnosed atypical ductal hyperplasia at core needle biopsy

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Chae, Byung J ^a,b   Lee, Ahwon ^a,b   Song, Byung J ^a,b   Jung, Sang S ^a,b  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^b The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; CALCIFICATION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; BREAST; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; FORECASTING; HYPERPLASIA; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VACUUM;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORECASTING; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; VACUUM;

EID: 71749085102     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777819     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-7-77     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Dahlstrom JE, Sutton S, Jain S. Histological precision of stereotactic core biopsy in diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions. Histopathology 1996, 28:537-541. 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1996.d01-463.x, 8803597.
2. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzoni FA. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994, 193:91-95.
3. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991, 180:403-407.
4. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Rados MS. Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study. Cancer 1985, 55:2698-2708. 10.1002/1097-0142(19850601)55:11<2698::AID-CNCR2820551127>3.0.CO;2-A, 2986821.
5. Dupont WD, Page DL. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. New England Journal of Medicine, The 1985, 312:146-151.
6. Rosen PP. Proliferative breast "disease". An unresolved diagnostic dilemma. Cancer 1993, 71:3798-3807. 10.1002/1097-0142(19930615)71:12<3798::AID-CNCR2820711203>3.0.CO;2-S, 8508347.
7. Shackney SE, Silverman JF. Molecular evolutionary patterns in breast cancer. Advances in anatomic pathology 2003, 10:278-290. 10.1097/00125480-200309000-00003, 12973049.
8. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995, 164:1111-1113.
9. Renshaw AA, Cartagena N, Schenkman RH, Derhagopian RP, Gould EW. Atypical ductal hyperplasia in breast core needle biopsies. Correlation of size of the lesion, complete removal of the lesion, and the incidence of carcinoma in follow-up biopsies. Am J Clin Pathol 2001, 116:92-96. 10.1309/61HM-89TD-0M3L-JAHH, 11447758.
10. Harvey JM, Sterrett GF, Frost FA. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypia of uncertain significance in core biopsies from mammographically detected lesions: correlation with excision diagnosis. Pathology 2002, 34:410-416. 10.1080/0031302021000009315, 12408338.
11. Bonnett M, Wallis T, Rossmann M, Pernick NL, Bouwman D, Carolin KA, Visscher D. Histopathologic analysis of atypical lesions in image-guided core breast biopsies. Mod Pathol 2003, 16:154-160. 10.1097/01.MP.0000052375.72841.E2, 12591968.
12. Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision?. Radiology 2002, 224:548-554. 10.1148/radiol.2242011528, 12147855.
13. Ely KA, Carter BA, Jensen RA, Simpson JF, Page DL. Core biopsy of the breast with atypical ductal hyperplasia: a probabilistic approach to reporting. Am J Surg Pathol 2001, 25:1017-1021. 10.1097/00000478-200108000-00005, 11474285.
14. Sneige N, Lim SC, Whitman GJ, Krishnamurthy S, Sahin AA, Smith TL, Stelling CB. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosis by directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Considerations for surgical excision. American journal of clinical pathology 2003, 119:248-253. 10.1309/0GYV4F2LLJAV4GFN, 12579995.
15. Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, Kaelin C, Selland DL, Denison CM, DiPiro PJ, Rose DI, Rhei E, Meyer JE. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 175:1341-1346.
16. Lennington WJ, Jensen RA, Dalton LW, Page DL. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Heterogeneity of individual lesions. Cancer 1994, 73:118-124. 10.1002/1097-0142(19940101)73:1<118::AID-CNCR2820730121>3.0.CO;2-R, 8275415.
17. Forgeard C, Benchaib M, Guerin N, Thiesse P, Mignotte H, Faure C, Clement-Chassagne C, Treilleux I. Is surgical biopsy mandatory in case of atypical ductal hyperplasia on 11-gauge core needle biopsy? A retrospective study of 300 patients. Am J Surg 2008, 196:339-345. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.038, 18585676.
18. Ko E, Han W, Lee JW, Cho J, Kim EK, Jung SY, Kang MJ, Moon WK, Park IA, Kim SW. Scoring system for predicting malignancy in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia at ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008, 112:189-195. 10.1007/s10549-007-9824-0, 18060577.
19. Brown TA, Wall JW, Christensen ED, Smith DV, Holt CA, Carter PL, Patience TH, Babu SS, Williard WC. Atypical hyperplasia in the era of stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol 1998, 67:168-173. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199803)67:3<168::AID-JSO5>3.0.CO;2-7, 9530887.
20. Hoang JK, Hill P, Cawson JN. Can mammographic findings help discriminate between atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ after needle core biopsy?. Breast 2008, 17:282-288. 10.1016/j.breast.2007.10.016, 18063369.
21. Moore MM, Hargett CW, Hanks JB, Fajardo LL, Harvey JA, Frierson HF, Slingluff CL. Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy. Ann Surg 1997, 225:726-731. discussion 731-723., 10.1097/00000658-199706000-00010, 1190878, 9230813.
22. Philpotts LE, Lee CH, Horvath LJ, Lange RC, Carter D, Tocino I. Underestimation of breast cancer with II-gauge vacuum suction biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 175:1047-1050.
23. Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T, Bird R, Norton HJ, Greene F. Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome?. Am J Surg 2000, 180:313-315. 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00451-7, 11113443.
24. Rao A, Parker S, Ratzer E, Stephens J, Fenoglio M. Atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Am J Surg 2002, 184:534-537. discussion 537., 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01107-8, 12488158.
25. Burak WE, Owens KE, Tighe MB, Kemp L, Dinges SA, Hitchcock CL, Olsen J. Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg 2000, 135:700-703. 10.1001/archsurg.135.6.700, 10843367.
26. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, Tocino I, Wray AB. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997, 204:485-488.
27. Helvie MA, Hessler C, Frank TS, Ikeda DM. Atypical hyperplasia of the breast: mammographic appearance and histologic correlation. Radiology 1991, 179:759-764.
28. Stomper PC, Cholewinski SP, Penetrante RB, Harlos JP, Tsangaris TN. Atypical hyperplasia: frequency and mammographic and pathologic relationships in excisional biopsies guided with mammography and clinical examination. Radiology 1993, 189:667-671.
29. Dershaw DD, Abramson A, Kinne DW. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications. Radiology 1989, 170:411-415.
30. Slanetz PJ, Giardino AA, Oyama T, Koerner FC, Halpern EF, Moore RH, Kopans DB. Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype. The breast journal 2001, 7:417-421. 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.07607.x, 11843854.
31. Holland R, Hendriks JH. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Seminars in diagnostic pathology 1994, 11:181-192.