Atypical ductal hyperplasia in breast core needle biopsies: Correlation of size of the lesion, complete removal of the lesion, and the incidence of carcinoma in follow-up biopsies

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 116, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 92-96

  Renshaw, Andrew A ^a   Cartagena, Norberto ^a   Schenkman, Randy H ^a   Derhagopian, Robert P ^a   Gould, Edwin W ^a  

^a BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

Atypical ductal hyperplasia; Biopsy; Breast; Carcinoma; Core needle biopsy; Mammotomy; Neoplasia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DUCT; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; CANCER INCIDENCE; CARCINOMA IN SITU; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; FEMALE; FLORIDA; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; INCIDENCE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0034962196     PISSN: 00029173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1309/61HM-89TD-0M3L-JAHH     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Meyers JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA. 1999;281:1638-1641.
2. Adler DD, Light RJ, Granstron P, et al. Follow-up of benign results of stereotactic core breast biopsy. Acad Radiol. 2000;7:248-253.
3. Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, et al. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology. 1999;212:189-194.
4. Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1017-1021.
5. Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, et al. Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results. Radiology. 2000;51:694-697.
6. Meyers JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology. 1998; 206:717-720.
7. Bauer RL, Sung J, Eckhert KH Jr, et al. Comparison of histologic diagnosis between stereotactic core needle biopsy and open surgical biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:316-320.
8. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, et al. Stereotaxic 14 gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology. 1994;192:793-795.
9. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, et al. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology. 1999;210:799-805.
10. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 1997;202:843-847.
11. Tocino I, Garcia BM, Carter D. Surgical biopsy findings in patients with atypical hyperplasia diagnosed by stereotaxic core needle biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996;3:483-488.
12. Gadzala DE, Cederbom GJ, Bolton JS, et al. Appropriate management of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by stereotactic core needle breast biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:283-286.
13. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, et al. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology. 1994;193:91-95.
14. Acheson MB, Patton RG, Howisey RL, et al. Histologic correlation of image-guided core biopsy with excisional biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Arch Surg. 1997;132:815-818.
15. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1111-1113.
16. Lin PH, Clyde JC, Bates DM, et al. Accuracy of stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy in atypical ductal hyperplasia. Am J Surg. 1998;175:380-382.
17. Brem RF, Behrndt VS, Sanow L, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: histologic underestimation of carcinoma in tissue harvested from impalpable breast lesions using 11-gauge stereotactically guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:1405-1407.
18. Moore MM, Hargett CW, Hanks JB, et al. Association of breast cancer with the finding of atypical ductal hyperplasia at core breast biopsy. Ann Surg. 1997;225:726-731.
19. Brown TA, Wall JW, Christensen ED, et al. Atypical hyperplasia in the era of stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol. 1998;67:168-173.
20. Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Tavassoli TA, et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of ductal proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria. Am J Surg Pathol. 1992;16:1133-1143.
21. Latosinsky S, Cornell D, Bear HD, et al. Evaluation of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) of the breast at a single institution. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;60:277-283.
22. Ioffe OB, Berg WA, Silverberg SG, et al. Mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle biopsies of the breast. Mod Pathol. 1998;11:721-727.
23. Renshaw AA. Measuring and reporting errors in surgical pathology: lessons from gynecologic cytology. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115:338-341.
24. Renshaw AA. Adequate histologic sampling of breast core needle biopsy specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med. In press.
25. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW. Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. Cancer. 1985;55:2698-2708.
26. Renshaw AA, Granter SR. Appropriate follow-up interval for biopsy confirmation of squamous intraepithelial lesions diagnosed by cervical smear cytology. Am J Clin Pathol. 1997;108:275-279.
27. Renshaw AA, Dean BR, Cibas EC. Receiver operating characteristic curves for analysis of the results of cervico-vaginal smears: a useful quality improvement tool. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121:968-975.