Energy Loss Due to Paravalvular Leak With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1857-1863

  Azadani, Ali N ^a,b   Jaussaud, Nicolas ^a,b   Matthews, Peter B ^a   Ge, Liang ^a,b   Guy, T Sloane ^a,b   Chuter, Timothy A M ^a,b   Tseng, Elaine E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPROSTHESIS; COMPLICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLE; ENERGY LOSS; EVALUATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEMODYNAMICS; IMPLANTATION; PARAVALVULAR LEAK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; WORKLOAD;

AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; ENERGY METABOLISM; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 71649107560     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Zajarias A., and Cribier A.G. Outcomes and safety of percutaneous aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 53 (2009) 1829-1836
2. Cribier A., Eltchaninoff H., Tron C., et al. Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43 (2004) 698-703
3. Grube E., Schuler G., Buellesfeld L., et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 50 (2007) 69-76
4. Webb J.G., Pasupati S., Humphries K., et al. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116 (2007) 755-763
5. Chiam P.T., and Ruiz C.E. Percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution of the technology. Am Heart J 157 (2009) 229-242
6. Lichtenstein S.V., Cheung A., Ye J., et al. Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in humans: initial clinical experience. Circulation 114 (2006) 591-596
7. Svensson L.G., Dewey T., Kapadia S., et al. United States feasibility study of transcatheter insertion of a stented aortic valve by the left ventricular apex. Ann Thorac Surg 86 (2008) 46-55
8. Cribier A., Eltchaninoff H., Tron C., et al. Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 (2006) 1214-1223
9. Vahanian A., Alfieri O., Al-Attar N., et al. Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European association of cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). EuroIntervention 4 (2008) 193-199
10. Ionescu A., Fraser A.G., and Butchart E.G. Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart 89 (2003) 1316-1321
11. Bhindi R., Bull S., Schrale R.G., Wilson N., and Ormerod O.J. Surgery Insight: percutaneous treatment of prosthetic paravalvular leaks. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 5 (2008) 140-147
12. Maraj R., Jacobs L.E., Ioli A., and Kotler M.N. Evaluation of hemolysis in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Clin Cardiol 21 (1998) 387-392
13. Clavel M.A., Webb J.G., Pibarot P., et al. Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 53 (2009) 1883-1891
14. Walther T., and Falk V. Hemodynamic evaluation of heart valve prostheses paradigm shift for transcatheter valves?. J Am Coll Cardiol 53 (2009) 1892-1893
15. Akins C.W., Travis B., and Yoganathan A.P. Energy loss for evaluating heart valve performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136 (2008) 820-833
16. Azadani A.N., Jaussaud N., Mathews P.B., et al. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter-bioprosthesis size mismatch. J Heart Valve Disease 18 (2009) 367-373
17. Leon M.B., Kodali S., Williams M., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with critical aortic stenosis: rationale, device descriptions, early clinical experiences, and perspectives. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 18 (2006) 165-174
18. Cardiovascular implants - Cardiac valve prostheses. ISO 5840:2005.
19. Division of Cardiovascular and Neurological Devices. Draft replacement heart valve guidance, version 4.1 (1994), Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC 1-134
20. Heinrich R.S., Fontaine A.A., Grimes R.Y., et al. Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: importance of pressure recovery. Ann Biomed Eng 24 (1996) 685-694
21. Sechtem U., Pflugfelder P.W., Cassidy M.M., et al. Mitral or aortic regurgitation: quantification of regurgitant volumes with cine MR imaging. Radiology 167 (1988) 425-430
22. Rodés-Cabau J., Dumont E., De LaRochellière R., et al. Feasibility and initial results of percutaneous aortic valve implantation including selection of the transfemoral or transapical approach in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 102 (2008) 1240-1246
23. Walther T., Simon P., Dewey T., et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation 116 11 suppl (2007) I240-I245
24. Garcia D., Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Sakr F., and Durand L.G. Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: A new index based on the energy loss concept. Circulation 101 (2000) 765-771
25. Bermejo J., Odreman R., Feijoo J., Moreno M.M., Gómez-Moreno P., and García-Fernández M.A. Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis: a comparative test-based analysis of outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 41 (2003) 142-151
26. Tongue A.G., Dumesnil J.G., Laforest I., Theriault C., Durand L.G., and Pibarot P. Left ventricular longitudinal shortening in patients with aortic stenosis: relationship with symptomatic status. J Heart Valve Dis 12 (2003) 142-149
27. Fisher J. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of six size 19 mm bileaflet heart valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 9 (1995) 692-696
28. Hartrumpf M., Kuehnel R.U., Puchner R., Wendt M.O., Pohl M., and Albes J.M. Different tilting disc valves show similar rotation-dependent impairment in hemodynamic performance under a tilted implantation position. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 53 (2005) 274-280
29. Travis B.R., Fowler B.L., and Robicsek F. A method for the measurement of left ventricular overload for aortic valve insufficiency. J Biomech 42 (2009) 1935-1940
30. MacIsaac A.I., McDonald I.G., Kirsner R.L., Graham S.A., and Tanzer D. Left ventricular energy in mitral regurgitation: a preliminary report. Aust N Z J Med 22 5 suppl (1992) 532-540
31. Teien D.E., Jones M., Shiota T., Yamada I., Frithiof D., and Sahn D.J. Left ventricular stroke work in mitral regurgitation: an animal experimental study. J Heart Valve Dis 6 (1997) 613-620