The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1055-1061

  Fenske, Mark J ^a,b   Raymond, Jane E ^a   Kunar, Melina A ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21944449143     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196736     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. AMARAL, D. G., & PRICE J. L. (1984). Amygdalo-cortical projections in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Journal of Comparative Neurology, 230, 465-496.
2. ARMONY, J. L., & DOLAN, R. J. (2002). Modulation of spatial attention by fear conditioned stimuli: An event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 817-826.
3. BORNSTEIN, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
4. BUSH, G., LUU, P., & POSNER, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 215-222.
5. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
6. EASTWOOD, J. D., SMILEK, D., & MERIKLE, P. M. (2001). Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1004-1013.
7. FENSKE, M. J., & EASTWOOD, J. D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: Evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3, 327-343.
8. Fox, E., Russo, R., BOWLES, R., & DUTTON, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681-700.
9. JIANG, Y., CHUN, M. M., & MARKS, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Dissociating effects of new and old set size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 293-302.
10. JIANG, Y., MARKS, L. E., & CHUN, M. M. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 717-750.
11. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
12. RAYMOND, J. E., FENSKE, M. J., & TAVASSOLI, N. T. (2003). Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 14, 537-542.
13. REBER, R., WINKIELMAN, P., & SCHWARZ, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48.
14. SCHNEIDER, W., ESCHMAN, A., & ZUCCOLOTTO, A. (2002). E-prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
15. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICCEUR, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
16. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
17. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 471-481.
18. WINKIELMAN, P., & CACIOPPO, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation increases positive affect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81, 989-1000.
19. ZAJONC, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224-228.