Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 133-138

  Goolsby, Brian A ^a   Shapiro, Kimron L ^a   Raymond, Jane E ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; FACE; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; FACE; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 62649158437     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.133     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423. doi:10.1016/ S1364-6613(00)01538-2
2. Besner, D., Davies, J., & Daniels, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 415-437.
3. Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and metaanalysis of research. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
4. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 545-552. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545
5. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103-128.
6. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87-114. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003922
7. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
8. Fenske, M. J., & Raymond, J. E. (2006). Affective influences of selective attention. Current Directions in Psychology, 15, 312-316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00459.x
9. Fenske, M. J., Raymond, J. E., & Kunar, M. A. (2004). The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1055-1061.
10. Goolsby, B. A., Shapiro, K. L., Silvert, L., Kiss, M., Fragopanagos, N., Taylor, J. G., et al. (in press). Feature-based inhibition underlies the affective consequences of attention. Visual Cognition. doi:10.1080/13506280801904095
11. Griffiths, O., & Mitchell, C. J. (2007). Negative priming reduces affective ratings. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1119-1129. doi:10.1080/02699930701664930
12. Jackson, M. C., & Raymond, J. E. (2008). Familiarity enhances visual working memory for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 556-568. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.556
13. Kiss, M., Goolsby, B. A., Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., Silvert, L., Nobre, A. C., et al. (2007). Efficient attentional selection predicts distractor devaluation: Event-related potential evidence for a direct link between attention and emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1316-1322. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1316
14. Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558. doi:10.1126/science.7352271
15. Oh, S.-H., & Kim, M.-S. (2004). The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 275-281.
16. Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2003). Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 14, 537-542. doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci462.x
17. Raymond, J. E., Fenske, M. J., & Westoby, N. (2005). Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: A consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1404-1415. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1404
18. Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45-48. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00008
19. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
20. Tipper, S. P., Grison, S., & Kessler, K. (2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14, 19-25. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01413
21. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269-274.
22. Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219-224. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00339
23. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 10, 224-228. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00154