The impact of epistatic selection on the genomic traces of selection

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 18, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 4985-4987

  Otto, Sarah P ^a   Whitlock, Michael C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Epistasis; Genetic variability; Genomic analyses; Selection; Sweeps

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC SELECTION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION;

ALLELES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC FITNESS; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 71549170274     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04425.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Depaulis F, Veuille M (1998) Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-sites model. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 1788 1790.
2. Kelly JK (1997) A test of neutrality based on interlocus associations. Genetics, 146, 1179 1206.
3. Pennings PS, Hermisson J (2006) Soft sweeps III: the signature of positive selection from recurrent mutation. PLoS Genetics, 2, 1998 2012.
4. Phillips PC (2008) Epistasis - the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9, 855 867.
5. Phillips PC, Otto SP, Whitlock MC (2000) Beyond the average, the evolutionary importance of gene interactions and variability of epistatic effects. In : Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process (eds Wolf JB, Brodie ED III., Wade MJ pp. 20 38. University Press, Oxford/New York.
6. Segrè D, DeLuna A, Church GM, Kishony R (2005) Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nature Genetics, 37, 77 83.
7. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics, 123, 585 595.
8. Takahasi KR (2009) Coalescent under the evolution of coadaptation. Molecular Ecology, 18, 5018 5029.
9. Teshima KM, Przeworski M (2006) Directional positive selection on an allele of arbitrary dominance. Genetics, 172, 713 718.
10. Teshima KM, Coop G, Przeworski M (2006) How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? Genome Research, 16, 702 712.
11. Whitlock MC, Phillips PC, Moore FBG, Tonsor S (1995) Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, 601 629.