Competitive federalism and the governance of controversial science

Publius: The Journal of Federalism

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 606-631

  Mintrom, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349456722     PISSN: 00485950     EISSN: 17477107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjn033     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2007. AAAS policy brief: stem cell research. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Bailey, Michael A., and Mark Carl Rom. 2004. A wider race? Interstate competition across health and welfare programs. The Journal of Politics 66 (2): 326-347.
2. Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960-93. American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327-349.
3. Billingsley, Melvin L., and Michele M. Washko. 2006. The new federalism in life sciences policy: What states and the federal government should do to ensure progress in the life sciences. The Scientist 20 (11): 22-23.
4. Boyles, Cindy. 2006. The media and interest groups in the stem cell controversy. Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA, January 5-7.
5. Bratton, William W., and Joseph A. McCahery. 1997. The new economics of jurisdictional competition: Devolutionary federalism in a second-best world. Georgetown Law Journal 86 (2): 201-278.
6. Buchanan, James M. 1995. Federalism as an ideal political order and an objective for constitutional reform. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 25 (2): 19-27.
7. Bush, George W. 2001. President discusses stem cell research. Transcript of televised speech, August 9. Washington, DC: The White House.
8. Cohen, Linda R., and Roger G. Noll. 1991. The technology pork barrel. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
9. Conlan, Tim, and John Dinan. 2007. Federalism, the Bush administration, and the transformation of American conservatism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 37 (3): 279-303.
10. Dupree, A. Hunter. 1986. Science in the federal government: a history of policies and activities. rev. ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Eisinger, Peter K. 1988. The rise of the entrepreneurial state: state and local economic development policy in the United States. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
12. Elazar, Daniel J. 1972. American federalism: a view from the states, 2nd ed. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
13. Evans, M. J., and M. H. Kaufman. 1981. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292: 154-156.
14. Fitzpatrick, Jody L., and Rodney E. Hero. 1988. Political culture and political characteristics of the American states: A consideration of some old and new questions. The Western Political Quarterly 41 (1): 145-153.
15. Florida, Richard L. 2005. The flight of the creative class: the new global competition for talent, 1st ed. New York: HarperBusiness.
16. Fukuyama, Francis. 2005. Human biomedicine and the problem of governance. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 (2): 195-200.
17. Geiger, Roger L. 1993. Research and relevant knowledge: American Research Universities since World War II. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Gottweiss, Herbert. 2002. Stem cell policies in the United States and Germany: Between bioethics and regulation. Policy Studies Journal 30 (4): 444-469.
19. Hurlbut, William B. 2006. Science, religion, and the politics of stem cells. Social Research 73 (3): 819-834.
20. Itskovitz-Eldor, Joseph, Sander S. Shapiro, Michelle A. Waknitz, Jennifer J. Swiergiel, Vivienne S. Marshall, and Jeffrey M. Jones. 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282: 1145-1147.
21. Johnson, Judith A., and Erin D. Williams. 2006a. Stem cell research: CRS report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
22. ---. 2006b. Stem cell research: State initiatives. CRS Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
23. Kincaid, John. 1995. Values and value tradeoffs in federalism. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 25 (2): 29-44.
24. Kolata, Gina. 2007a. Researcher who helped start stem cell war may now end it. The New York Times, November 22, p. A1.
25. ---. 2007b. Scientists bypass need for embryo to get stem cells. New York Times, November 21, p. A1.
26. Krane, Dale. 2007. The middle tier in American federalism: State government policy activism during the Bush Presidency. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 37 (3): 453-477.
27. Lowe, Nichola J. 2007. Job creation and the knowledge economy: Lessons from North Carolina's life science manufacturing initiative. Economic Development Quarterly 21 (4): 339-353.
28. Luger, Michael I. 1991. Technology in the garden: research parks and regional economic development. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
29. Moe, Terry M. 1991. Politics and the theory of organization. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7 (Special Issue): 106-129.
30. Mooney, Christopher Z. 2000. The decline of federalism and the rise of morality-policy conflict in the United States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 30 (1): 171-188.
31. Mooney, Christopher Z., ed. 2001. The public clash of private values: the politics of morality policy. New York: Chatham House.
32. Mooney, Christopher Z, and Richard G. Schuldt. 2008. Does morality policy exist? Testing a basic assumption. Policy Studies Journal 36 (2): 199-218.
33. National Institutes of Health. 2001. Stem cells: scientific progress and future research directions. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
34. ---. 2006. Regenerative medicine. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
35. Noll, Roger G. 2006. Designing an effective program of state-sponsored human embryonic stem cell research. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 21 (3): 1143-1175.
36. Paarlberg, Robert L. 2005. The great stem cell race. Foreign Policy 148: 44-51.
37. Peterson, Paul E. 1981. City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. ---. 1995. The price of federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
39. Posner, Paul L. 1998. The Politics of unfunded mandates: whither federalism? Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
40. Prakash, Aseem. 2003. Biopolitics in the EU and the U.S.: A race to the bottom or convergence to the top? International Studies Quarterly 47: 617-641.
41. Rabe, Barry. 2007. Environmental policy and the Bush era: The collision between the administrative presidency and state experimentation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism37 (3): 413-431.
42. Ramalho-Santos, Miguel, and Holger Willenbring. 2007. On the origin of the term ''Stem Cell.'' Cell Stem Cell 1 (1): 35-38.
43. Sail, Martin. 2001. Politics and economic development: Why governments adopt different strategies to induce economic growth. Policy Studies Journal 29 (2): 203-214.
44. Schön, Donald A., and Martin Rein. 1994. Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: BasicBooks.
45. Sheingate, Adam D. 2006. Promotion versus precaution: The evolution of biotechnology policy in the United States. British Journal of Political Science 36: 243-268.
46. Smilor, Raymond, Niall O'Donnell, Gregory Stein, and Robert S. Welborn III. 2007. The Research University and the development of high-technology centers in the United States. Economic Development Quarterly 21 (3): 203-222.
47. Stein, Robert M., and Kenneth N. Bickers. 1995. Perpetuating the pork barrel: policy subsystems and American democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Thatcher, David, and Martin Rein. 2004. Managing value conflict in public policy. Governance 17 (4): 457-486.
49. Thomson, James A., Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor, Sander S. Shapiro, Michelle A. Waknitz, Jennifer J. Swiergiel, Vivienne S. Marshall, and Jeffrey M. Jones. 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282: 1145-1147.
50. Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64: 416-424.
51. Trivedi, Bijal. 2007. Researchers detour around stem-cell rules. Chronicle of Higher Education, October 5.
52. Volden, Craig. 2005. Intergovernmental political competition in American federalism. American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 327-342.
53. Withrow, Emily. 2007. Global trade in human eggs thriving. The Washington Post, January 27.
54. Wright, Gerald C., Robert S. Erikson, and John P. McIver. 1985. Measuring state partisanship and ideology with survey data. The Journal of Politics 47: 469-489.
55. Yu, Junying, Maxim A. Vodyanik, Kim Smuga-Otto, Jessica Antosiewicz-Bourget, Jennifer L. Frane, Shulan Tian, Jeff Nie, Gudrun A. Jonsdottir, Victor Ruotti, Ron Stewart, Igor I. Slukvin, and James A. Thomson. 2007. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 20: 115-126.