On global effects caused by locally noneffective unitary operations

Quantum Information and Computation

Volumn 9, Issue 11-12, 2009, Pages 1013-1029

  Gharibian, Sevag ^a   Kampermann, Hermann ^b   Bruss, Dagmar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cyclic unitary; Entanglement; Entanglement detection; Locally noneffective unitary; Non locality

Indexed keywords

QUANTUM COMPUTERS; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

ARBITRARY DIMENSION; BIPARTITE QUANTUM STATE; CYCLIC UNITARY; ENTANGLEMENT; ENTANGLEMENT DETECTION; GLOBAL EFFECTS; LOCALLY NONEFFECTIVE UNITARY; NONLOCALITIES; TWO-QUBIT STATE; UNITARY OPERATION;

EQUIVALENCE CLASSES;

EID: 71549138709     PISSN: 15337146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.26421/qic9.11-12-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. D. Bruß (2002), Characterizing entanglement, J. Math. Phys., Vol.43, p. 4237, 2002.
2. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki (2007), Quantum entanglement, arXiv:quant-ph/0702225v2.
3. L. Gurvits (2003), Classical deterministic complexity of Edmonds' problem and quantum entanglement, Proc. of the 35th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pp. 10-19, ACM Press (New York).
4. S. Gharibian (2008), Strong NP-hardness of the quantum separability problem, arXiv:0810.4507v2.
5. S. Beigi (2008), NP vs QMA-log(2), arXiv:0810.5109v1.
6. P. Eberhard (1993), Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole free EinsteinPodolsky-Rosen experiment, Phys. Rev. A, Vol.47, pp. R747-R750.
7. A. Acín, T. Durt, N. Gisin, and J. I. Latorre (2002), Quantum nonlocality in two three-level systems, Phys. Rev. A, Vol.65, p. 052325.
8. N. Brunner, N. Gisin, and V. Scarani (2005), Entanglement and non-locality are different resources, New Journal of Physics, Vol.7, p. 88.
9. A. A. Méthot and V. Scarani (2007), An anomaly of non-locality, Quantum Inf. Comput., Vol.7, pp. 157-170.
10. L. B. Fu (2006), Nonlocal effect of bipartite system induced by local cyclic operation, Europhys. Lett., Vol.75, pp. 1-7.
11. C. Bennett and S. Wiesner (1992), Communication via one- and two-particle operators on EinsteinPodolsky-Rosen states, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol.69, pp. 2881-2884.
12. U. Fano (1983), Pairs of two-level systems, Rev. Mod. Phys., Vol.55, pp. 855-874.
13. G. Kimura (2003), The Bloch vector for N-level systems, Phys. Lett. A, Vol.314, pp. 339-349.
14. M. Nielsen and I. Chuang (2000), Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press.
15. A. O. Pittenger and M. H. Rubin (2000), Note on separability of the Werner states in arbitrary dimensions, Optics Comm., Vol.179, pp.447-449.
16. M. Nielsen (1999), Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol.83, pp. 436-439.
17. S. Hill and W. K. Wootters (1997), Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol.78, p. 5022.
18. W. K. Wootters (1998), Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol.80, p. 2245.
19. A. Uhlmann (2000), Fidelity and concurrence of conjugated states, Phys. Rev. A, Vol.62, p. 3237.
20. P. Rungta, V. Bǔzek, C. M. Caves, M. Hillery, and G. J. Milburn (2001), Universal state inversion and concurrence in arbitrary dimensions, Phys. Rev. A, Vol.64, p. 042315.
21. K. Audenaert, F. Verstraete, and B. De Moor (2001), Variational characterizations of separability and entanglement of formation, Phys. Rev. A, Vol.64, p. 052304.
22. W. K. Wootters (2001), Entanglement of formation and concurrence, Quantum Inf. Comput., Vol.1, pp. 27-44.
23. P. Badzia̧g, P. Deuar, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki (2002), Concurrence in arbitrary dimensions, J. of Modern Optics, Vol.49, pp. 1289-1297.
24. R. F. Werner (1989), Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model, Phys. Rev. A, Vol.40, pp.4277-4281.
25. A. Datta and S. Gharibian (2009), Signatures of nonclassicality in mixed-state quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A, Vol.79, p. 042325.
26. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and M. Horodecki (1995), Violating Bell inequality by mixed spin-1/2 states: necessary and sufficient condition, Phys. Lett. A., Vol.200, pp. 340-344.
27. R. Horodecki and M. Horodecki (1996), Information-theoretic aspects of quantum inseparability of mixed states, Phys. Rev. A., Vol.54, pp. 1838-1843.
28. R. Horodecki and P. Horodecki (1996), Perfect correlations in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment and Bell's inequalities, Phys. Lett. A, Vol.210, p. 227.
29. J. Gallier (2000), Geometric Methods and Applications For Computer Science and Engineering, Springer.
30. N. Gisin (1991), Bell's inequality holds for all non-product states, Phys. Lett. A, Vol.154, p. 201.
31. P. Horodecki (1997), Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Phys. Lett. A, Vol.232, pp. 333-359.
32. P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki (1999), Bound entanglement can be activated, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol.82, pp. 1056-1059.
33. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, T. Mor, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and B .M. Terhal (1999), Unextendible product bases and bound entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol.82, pp. 5385-5388.