Signatures of nonclassicality in mixed-state quantum computation

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Datta, Animesh ^a   Gharibian, Sevag ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSICAL CORRELATION; DENSITY MATRIX; LOCKING EFFECTS; MUTUALLY UNBIASED BASIS; NONCLASSICALITY; QUANTUM COMPUTATION; QUANTUM STATE; UNITARY OPERATION;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; QUANTUM COMPUTERS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 65649099689     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042325     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. R. Jozsa and N. Linden, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 459, 2011 (2003). 10.1098/rspa.2002.1097 (Pubitemid 38337427)
2. L. Masanes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 150501 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96. 150501
3. D. A. Meyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2014 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85. 2014
4. E. Biham, G. Brassard, D. Kenigsberg, and T. Mor, Theor. Comput. Sci. 320, 15 (2004). 10.1016/j.tcs.2004.03.041
5. D. Kenigsberg, T. Mor, and G. Ratsaby, Quantum Inf. Comput. 6, 606 (2006).
6. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, C. A. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1070
7. A. A. Methot and V. Scarani, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 157 (2007).
8. A. Ambainis, L. J. Schulman, and U. V. Vazirani, Proceedings of 32nd Symposium on the Theory of Computing (ACM, New York, 2000), p. 697.
9. E. Knill and R. Laflamme, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5672 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5672
10. A. Datta, S. T. Flammia, and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. A 72, 042316 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.042316
11. H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017901 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017901
12. L. Henderson and V. Vedral, J. Phys. A 34, 6899 (2001). 10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315 (Pubitemid 33331683)
13. A. Datta, A. Shaji, and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 050502 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.050502
14. L. Fu, Europhys. Lett. 75, 1 (2006). 10.1209/epl/i2005-10598-7
15. S. Gharibian, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruss, e-print arXiv:0809.4469.
16. S. Luo, Phys. Rev. A 77, 022301 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.022301
17. D. P. DiVincenzo, M. Horodecki, D. W. Leung, J. A. Smolin, and B. M. Terhal, e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0303088.
18. M. A. Ballester and S. Wehner, Phys. Rev. A 75, 022319 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.022319 (Pubitemid 46309781)
19. P. Diaconis, Bull., New Ser., Am. Math. Soc. 40, 155 (2003). 10.1090/S0273-0979-03-00975-3 (Pubitemid 36507738)
20. U. Fano, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 855 (1983). 10.1103/RevModPhys.55.855
21. F. T. Hioe and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 838 (1981). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.838
22. The set of orthonormal eigenvectors of ρA will not be unique if the eigenvalues of ρA are degenerate. Hence, we fix some choice of eigenbasis for ρA as the "canonical" choice to be referred to throughout the rest of our discussion.
23. A. Datta, Ph.D. thesis, University of New Mexico, 2008 (unpublished)
24. e-print arXiv:0807.4490.
25. P. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997). 10.1016/S0375-9601(97)00416- 7
26. A. C. Doherty, P. A. Parrilo, and F. M. Spedalieri, Phys. Rev. A 69, 022308 (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.022308
27. P. Hayden, D. W. Leung, P. W. Shor, and A. Winter, Commun. Math. Phys. 250, 371 (2004). 10.1007/s00220-004-1087-6 (Pubitemid 39374478)
28. W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012320 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012320