Electronic health record: Implementation across the Michigan Academic Consortium

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 44-52

  Bostrom, Andrea C ^a   Schafer, Patricia ^a   Dontje, Kathy ^b   Pohl, Joanne M ^c   Nagelkerk, Jean ^a   Cavanagh, Stephen J ^d  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic charting; Electronic health record; Electronic health record implementation; Informatics; Nurse managed primary care centers

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDUCATION; FACULTY PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RECORD; NURSE PRACTITIONER; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STUDENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MICHIGAN; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING FACULTY PRACTICE; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PILOT PROJECTS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SCHOOLS, NURSING; SOFTWARE; STUDENTS, NURSING; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 33645076773     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00024665-200601000-00011     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in American. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
2. Hersh WR. Medical informatics: improving healthcare through information. JAMA. 2002;288(16):1955-1958.
3. Hannan TJ. Variation in healthcare - the roles of the electronic medical record. Int J Med Inform. 1999;54(2):127-136.
4. Shiffman RN, Brandt CA, Freeman BG. Transition to computer-based record using scannable, structured encounter forms. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(12):1247-1253.
5. Adams WG, Mann AM, Baucher H. Use of an electronic medical record improves the quality of urban pediatric primary care. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):626-632.
6. Bates DW, Ebell M, Gotlieb E, Zapp J, Mullins HC. A proposal for electronic medical records in US primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(1):1-10.
7. Loomis GA, Ries JS, Saywell RM, Thakker NR. If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?. J Fam Pract. 2002;51(7):636-641.
8. Miller RH, Sim I, Newman J. Electronic Medical Records: Lessons Learned From Small Physician Practices. Oakland, CA: California HealthCare Foundation; 2003.
9. Staggers N, Gassert CA, Curran C. A Delphi study to determine informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice. Nurs Res. 2002;51(6):383-390.
10. Curran CR. Informatics competencies for nurse practitioners. AACN Clin Issues. 2003;14(3):320-330.
11. Moody LE, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004;22(6):337-344.
12. Darbyshire P. "Rage against the machine?": Nurses' and midwives' experiences of using computerized patient information systems for clinical information. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(1):17-25.
13. Health Resources and Services Administration. Bureau of Primary Health Care. http://bphc.hrsa.gov/chc/SIMIS/CHC_CaseStudies.asp. Accessed December 2003.
14. Kuruppuarachchi PR, Mandal P, Smith R. IT project implementation strategies for effective changes: a critical review. Logistics Inform Manage. 2002;15:126-137.