Enhancing prisoner reentry through access to prison-based and post-incarceration aftercare treatment: Experiences from the Illinois Sheridan Correctional Center therapeutic community

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 299-321

  Olson, David E ^a   Rozhon, Jennifer ^b   Powers, Mark ^c  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Illinois Department of Corrections   (United States)

^c Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug treatment completion; Prison based drug treatment; Prisoner reentry

Indexed keywords

EID: 71449100032     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-009-9080-x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y. I. (1991). Criminal justice and the drug abusing offender: Policy issues of coerced treatment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9(3), 243-267.
2. Anglin, M. D., Longshore, D., & Turner, S. (1999). Treatment alternatives to street crime: An evaluation of five programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(2), 168-195.
3. Beck, A. J., & Gilliard, D. K. (1995). Prisoners in 1994. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice.
4. Brocato, J., & Wagner, E. F. (2008). Predictors of retention in an alternative-to-prison substance abuse treatment program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(1), 99-119.
5. Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2007). Residential substance abuse treatment (RSAT) for state prisoners program FY 2008 formula grant announcement. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice.
6. Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. Criminal Justice 2000: Policies, Processes, and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System 3: 109-176. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice.
7. De Leon, G. (1988). Legal pressure in therapeutic communities. Journal of Drug Issues, 4, 625-640.
8. Farabee, D., Prendergast, M., Cartier, J., Wexler, J., Knight, K., & Anglin, M. D. (1999). Barriers to implementing effective correctional drug treatment programs. The Prison Journal, 79(2), 150-62.
9. Field, G. (1998). Continuity of offender treatment for substance use disorders from institution to community. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 30. Washington, D. C.: Department of Health and Human Services.
10. Gaes, G. G., Flanagan, T. J., Motiuk, L. K., & Stewart, L. (1999). Adult correctional treatment. In M. H. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons (pp. 361-426). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Gerstein, D. R., Johnson, R. A., Harwood, H. J., Fountain, D., Suter, N., & Malloy, K. (1994). Evaluating recovery services: the California drug and alcohol treatment assessment (CALDATA). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Resource Center.
12. Glaze, L. E., & Bonzcar, T. P. (2006). Probation and parole in the United States, 2006. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice.
13. Harrison, L. L., & Martin, S. S. (2000). Residential substance abuse treatment (RSAT) for state prisoners formula grant: compendium of program implementation and accomplishments. Newark, DE: Center for Drug and Alcohol Studies.
14. Hiller, M., Knight, K., Broome, K., & Simpson, D. (1998). Legal pressure and treatment retention in a national sample of long term residential programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 463-481.
15. Hubbard, R., Marsden, M., Rachel, J., Harwood, H., Cavanaugh, E., & Ginzburg, H. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: a national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
16. Huebner, B. M., & Cobbina, J. (2007). The effect of drug use, drug treatment participation, and treatment completion on probationer recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, Summer 2007, 619-642.
17. Illinois Department of Corrections. (2006). Sheridan correctional center integrated standard operating procedure manual. Springfield: Illinois Department of Corrections.
18. Illinois State Police. (2006). Crime in Illinois. Springfield: Illinois State Police.
19. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., Lockwood, D., Hooper, R. H., & Wald, B. A. (1992). Obstacles to the implementation and evaluation of drug treatment in correctional settings: Reviewing the Delaware KEY experience. In National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series #118: Drug Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails, edited by Carl G. Leukenfeld and Frank M. Tims (176-191). Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
20. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Hooper, R. M., & Harrison, L. D. (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 27, 261-278.
21. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., & Butzin, C. A. (2004). Five year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment of drug involved offenders released from prison. Crime and Delinquency, 50, 88-107.
22. Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., & Hiller, M. L. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. The Prison Journal, 79, 337-351.
23. Knight, K., Hiller, M., Broome, K., & Simpson, D. (2000). Legal pressure, treatment readiness, and engagement in long-term residential treatment programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 31, 101-115.
24. Knight, K., Simpson, D., Chatham, L., & Camacho, L. (2004). An assessment of prison-based treatment: Texas' in-prison therapeutic community program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 24, 75-100.
25. Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice.
26. LaVigne, N., Visher, C., & Castro, J. (2004). Chicago prisoners' experiences returning home. Washington D. C.: The Urban Institute.
27. Lipton, D. S. (1995). The effectiveness of treatment for drug abusers under criminal justice supervision. Washington D. C.: National Institute of Justice.
28. Lipton, D. S., Pearson, F. S., & Wexler, H. K. (2000). Final report: national evaluation of the residential substance abuse treatment for state prisoners program from onset to midpoint. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice).
29. Lurigio, A. J. (2000). Drug treatment availability and effectiveness: Studies of the general and criminal justice populations. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(4), 495-528.
30. MacKenzie, D. L. (1997). Criminal justice and crime prevention. In L. W. Sherman, D. Gottfredson, D. MacKenzie, J. Eck, P. Reuter & S. Bushway (Eds.), Preventing crime: what works, what doesn't and what's promising. Washington, D. C.: National Institute of Justice.
31. Mears, D. P., Winterfield, L., Hunsaker, J., Moore, G. E., & White, R. M. (2003). Drug treatment in the criminal justice system: The current state of knowledge. Washington, D. C.: Urban Institute.
32. Melnick, G., DeLeon, G., Hawke, J., Jainchill, N., & Kressel, D. (1997). Motivation and readiness for therapeutic community treatment among adolescent and adult substance abusers. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 485-506.
33. Messina, N., Wish, E., & Nemes, S. (2000). Predictors of treatment outcomes in men and women admitted to a therapeutic community. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26, 207-227.
34. Mitchell, O., Wilson D. B. & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). The effectiveness of incarceration-based drug treatment on criminal behavior. (Campbell Collaboration, Criminal Justice Review Group).
35. Morrissey, J. P., Steadman, H. J., & Kilburn, M. R. (1983). Organizational issues in the delivery of jail mental health services. Research in Community and Mental Health, 3, 291-317.
36. Mumola, C. J. (1999). Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners, 1997. Washington DC.: U. S. Department of Justice).
37. Mumola, C. J., & Karberg, J. C. (2006). Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice.
38. National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2002). Therapeutic Community-Research Report Series. Washington, D. C.: Department of Health and Human Services.
39. Nielsen, A. L., & Scarpitti, F. R. (2002). Predicting retention in a therapeutic community for incarcerated substance abusers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34(4), 47-65.
40. Office of National Drug Control Policy. (1999). The National Drug Control Strategy: 1999 Annual Report. Washington, D. C.: Office of National Drug Control Policy.
41. Olson, D. E., Alderden, M., & Lurigio, A. J. (2003). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: But what role does gender play in probationer recidivism?. Fall: Justice Research and Policy. 2003.
42. Olson, D. E., Dooley, B., & Kane, C. (2004). The relationship between gang membership and inmate recidivism. Chicago, Illinois: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
43. Pearson, F., & Lipton, D. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatment for drug abuse. The Prison Journal, 79, 384-410.
44. Pearson, F. S., Lipton, D. S., Cleland, C. M., & Yee, D. S. (2002). Effects of behavioral/cognitive-behavioral programs on recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 48(3), 476-496.
45. Roman, C. G., & Travis, J. (2004). Housing, homelessness, and prisoner reentry. Washington, D. C.: Urban Institute.
46. Simpson, D., Joe, G., & Brown, B. (1997). Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 294-307.
47. Travis, J. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, D. C.: Urban Institute.
48. Welsh, W. N. (2007). A multisite evaluation of prison-based therapeutic community drug treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(11), 1481-1498.
49. West, H. C., & Sabol, W. J. (2008). Prisoners in 2007. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice.
50. Wexler, H., Melnick, G., Lowe, L., & Peters, J. (1999). Three year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. The Prison Journal, 79, 321-336.