Barriers to implementing effective correctional drug treatment programs

Prison Journal

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 150-162

  Farabee, David ^a   Prendergast, Michael ^a   Cartier, Jerome ^a   Wexler, Harry ^b   Knight, Kevin ^c   Anglin, M Douglas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

^c TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001583826     PISSN: 00328855     EISSN: 15527522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0032885599079002002     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
2. Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y. (1991). Criminal justice and the drug-abusing offender: Policy issues of coerced treatment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9, 243-267.
3. Anglin, M. D., Longshore, D., Turner, S., McBride, D., Inciardi, J. A., & Prendergast, M. L. (1996). Studies of the functioning and effectiveness of Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) programs. Los Angeles: UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center.
4. Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (1998). Behind bars: Substance abuse and America's prison population. New York: Columbia University.
5. Collins, J. J., & Allison, M. (1983). Legal coercion and retention in drug abuse treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 34, 1145-1149.
6. Craddock, S. G., Rounds-Bryant, J. L., Flynn, P. M., & Hubbard, R. L. (1997). Characteristics and pretreatment behaviors of clients entering drug abuse treatment: 1969 to 1993. American Journal of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 23(1), 43-59.
7. De Leon, G. (1991). Retention in drug-free therapeutic communities. In R. Pickens, C. G. Leukefeld, & C. R. Schuster (Eds.), Improving drug abuse treatment (NIDA Research Monograph 106; pp. 218-244). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
8. De Leon, G. (1995). Therapeutic communities for addictions: A theoretical framework. International Journal of the Addictions, 30(12), 1603-1645.
9. Farabee, D., Prendergast, M. L., & Anglin, M. D. (1998). The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation, 62(1), 3-10.
10. Field, G. (1989). A study of the effects of intensive treatment on reducing the criminal recidivism of addicted offenders. Federal Probation, 53(10), 51-56.
11. Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
12. Gendreau, P. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work (pp. 117-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Gerstein, D. R., & Harwood, H. J. (Eds.). (1990). Treating drug problems (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Graham, W. F., & Wexler, H. (1997). The Amity therapeutic community program at Donovan Prison: Program description and approach. In G. De Leon (Ed.), Community as method (pp. 69-86). Westport, CT: Praeger.
15. Gustafson, J. S. (1991). Do it more..and do it better: Staff-related issues in the drug treatment field that affect the quality and effectiveness of services. In R. Pickens, C. G. Leukefeld, & C. R. Schuster (Eds.), Improving drug abuse treatment (NIDA Research Monograph 106; pp. 53-62). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
16. Harris, P., & Smith, S. (1996). Developing community corrections: An implementation perspective. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work (pp. 183-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Harland, A., Warren, M., & Brown, E. (1979). A guide to restitution programming (Working Paper No. 17). Albany, NY: Criminal Justice Research Center.
18. Holden, C. (1986). Growing focus on criminal careers. Science, 233, 1377-1378.
19. Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. F., Hooper, R. M., & Harrison, L. D. (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 27(2), 261-278.
20. Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., Chatham, L. R., & Camacho, L. M. (1997). An assessment of prison-based drug treatment: Texas' in-prison therapeutic community program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 24 (3/4), 75-100.
21. Leukefeld, C. G. (1978). A comparison of voluntary and involuntary admissions to treatment for addiction. In A. Schecter, H. Alkine, & E. Kaufman (Eds.), Critical concern in the field of drug abuse (pp. 260-264). New York: Marcel Decker.
22. Leukefeld, C. G., Gallego, M. A., & Farabee, D. (1997). Drugs, crime, and HIV. Substance Use and Misuse, 32(6), 749-756.
23. Leukefeld, C. G., & Tims, F. M. (1988). Compulsory treatment: A review of findings. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86; pp. 236-249). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
24. Lowe, L., Wexler, H. K., & Peters, J. (1998). The R. J. Donovan in-prison and community substance abuse program: Three-year return to custody data. Sacramento, CA: Office of Substance Programs, California Department of Corrections.
25. Miller, W. R. (1989). Increasing motivation for change. In R. K. Hester & W. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches (pp. 67-80). New York: Pergamon Press.
26. Monahan, J., Hoge, S. K., Lidz, C., Roth, L. H., Bennett, N., Gardner, W., & Mulvey, E. (1995). Coercion and commitment: Understanding involuntary mental hospital admission. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18, 249-263.
27. Morrissey, J. P., Steadman, H. J., & Kilburn, H. C. (1983). Organizational issues in the delivery of jail mental health services. Research in Community and Mental Health, 3, 291-317.
28. Narcotic Addiction Rehabilitation Act (NARA) of 1966, Pub. L. No. 89-793.
29. Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3793 (1968).
30. Palumbo, D. J., & Hallett, M. A. (1993). Conflict versus consensus models in policy evaluation and implementation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 16, 11-23.
31. Petersilia, J. (1990). Conditions that permit intensive supervision programs to survive. Crime & Delinquency, 36(1), 126-145.
32. Prendergast, M. L., Wellisch, J., & Wong, M. M. (1996). Residential treatment for women parolees following prison-based drug treatment: Treatment experiences, needs and services, outcomes. The Prison Journal, 76(3), 253-274.
33. Schlosser, E. (1998, December). The prison-industrial complex. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 51-77.
34. Simpson, D. D., & Friend, H. J. (1988). Legal status and long-term outcomes for addicts in the DARP follow-up project. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Compulsory treatment of drug abuse: Research and clinical practice (NIDA Research Monograph 86; pp. 81-98). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
35. Thorton, C. C., Gottheil, E., Weinstein, S. P., & Kerachsky, R. S. (1998). Patient-treatment matching in substance abuse: Drug abuse severity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15(6), 505-511.
36. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons. (1997). Key indicators strategic support system. Washington, DC: Author.
37. Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, Pub. L. No. 103-322, § 32001 (1994).
38. Wexler, H. K., De Leon, G., Thomas, G., Kressel, D., & Peters, J. (1999). The Amity prison TC evaluation: Reincarceration outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(2), 147-167.
39. Wexler, H. K., Falkin, G. P., Lipton, D. S., & Rosenblum, A. B. (1992). Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment. In C. G. Leukefeld & F. M. Tims (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment in prisons and jails (NIDA Research Monograph 118; pp. 156-175). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.