Surveillance indicators for potential reduced exposure products (PREPs): Developing survey items to measure awareness

Harm Reduction Journal

Volumn 6, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Bogen, Karen ^a   Biener, Lois ^b   Garrett, Catherine A ^b   Allen, Jane ^c   Cummings, K Michael ^d   Hartman, Anne ^e   Marcus, Stephen ^e   McNeill, Ann ^f   O'Connor, Richard J ^d   Parascandola, Mark ^e   Pederson, Linda ^g  

^a MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^c American Legacy Foundation   (United States)

^d ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COGNITION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; POSTMARKETING SURVEILLANCE; POTENTIAL REDUCED EXPOSURE PRODUCTS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SMOKELESS TOBACCO; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

EID: 71249151174     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777517     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7517-6-27     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Stratton K, Shetty P, Wallace R, Bondurant S, . eds Clearing the Smoke: Assessing the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction 2001, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
2. Pederson LL, Nelson DE. Literature review and summary of perceptions, attitudes, beliefs, and marketing of potentially reduced exposure products: communication implications. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2007, 9(5):525-534.
3. Hickman N, Klonoff EA, Landrine H, Kashima K, Parekh B, Fernandez S, Thomas K, Brouillard C. Preliminary Investigation of the Advertising and Availability of PREPs, the New "Safe" Tobacco Products. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2004, 27(4):413-424. 10.1023/B:JOBM.0000042413.69425.aa, 15559736.
4. Hatsukami DK, Ebbert JO, Feuer RM, Stepanov I, Hecht SS. Changing smokeless tobacco products: New tobacco-delivery systemts. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2007, 33(6S):s368-s378. 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.005, 18021912.
5. Joseph AM, Hennrikus D, Thoele MJ, Krueger R, Hatsukami D. Community tobacco control leaders' perceptions of harm reduction. Tobacco Control 2004, 13(2):108-113. 1747850, 15175521, 10.1136/tc.2003.004242.
6. Martin EG, Warner KE, Lantz PM. Tobacco harm reduction: what do the experts think?. Tobacco Control 2004, 13(2):123-128. 1747871, 15175526, 10.1136/tc.2003.006346.
7. Parascandola M, Augustson E, O'Connell ME, Marcus S. Consumer awareness and attitudes related to new potential reduced-exposure tobacco product brands. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 2009, 11(7):886-895. 10.1093/ntr/ntp082, 19541949.
8. Caraballo RS, Pederson LL, Gupta N. New tobacco products: do smokers like them?. Tobacco Control 2006, 15(1):39-44. 2563627, 16436404, 10.1136/tc.2005.012856.
9. Shiffman S, Pillitteri JL, Burton SL, Di Marino ME. Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk. Tobacco Control 2004, 13:78-84. 1747811, 14985602, 10.1136/tc.2003.005272.
10. Foulds J, Kozlowski L. Snus-what should the public-health response be?. The Lancet 2007,
11. Foulds J, Ramström LM, Burke M, Fagerstrom K. Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden. Tobacco Control 2003, 12(4):349-359. 1747791, 14660766, 10.1136/tc.12.4.349.
12. Gartner CE, Hall WD, Vos T, Bertram MY, Wallace AL, Lim SS. Assessment of Swedish snus for tobacco harm reduction: An epidemiological modelling study. The Lancet 2007,
13. Luo J, Ye W, Zendehdel K, Adami J, Adami H-O, Boffetta P, Nyrén O. Oral use of Swedish moist snuff (snus) and risk for cancer of the mouth, lung, and pancreas in male construction workers: A restrospective cohort study. The Lancet 2007, 369(9578):2015-2020.
14. Critchley J, Unal B. Health effects associated with smokeless tobacco: A systematic review. Thorax 2003, 58(5):435-443. 1746661, 12728167, 10.1136/thorax.58.5.435.
15. Levy DT, Mumford EA, Cummings KM, Gilpin EA, Giovino G, Hyland A, Sweanor D, Warner KE. The relative risks of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product compared with smoking cigarettes: estimates of a panel of experts. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention 2004, 13(12):2035-2042.
16. Savitz DA, Meyer RE, Tanzer JM, Mirvish SS, Lewin F. Public health implications of smokeless tobacco use as a harm reduction strategy. American Journal of Public Health 2006, 96(11):1934-1939. 1751814, 17018821, 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075499.
17. O'Connor RJ, McNeill A, Borland R, Hammond D, King B, Boudreau C, Cummings KM. Smokers' beliefs about the relative safety of other tobacco products: findings from the ITC collaboration. Nicotine & Tob Research 2007, 9(10):1033-1042.
18. O'Connor RJ, Hyland A, Giovino GA, Fong GT, Cummings KM. Smoker Awareness of and Beliefs About Supposedly Less-Harmful Tobacco Products. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2005, 29(2):85-90. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.04.013, 16005803.
19. Hatsukami D, Hecht SS. Hope or Hazard? What Research Tells Us About "Potentially Reduced-Exposure" Tobacco Products. 2005, Accessed January 5, 2009., http://www.tturc.umn.edu/documents/hope_or_hazard-3.pdf
20. Hatsukami DK, Lemmonds C, Tomar SL. Smokeless tobacco use: harm reduction or induction approach?. Prev Med 2004, 38(3):309-317. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.10.006, 14766113.
21. Biener L, Bogen K, Garrett CA. PREPs Surveillance: Summary of Existing Survey Measures and Recommendations for Ongoing Efforts. 2006, Accessed 7/1/08., http://www.csr.umb.edu/pdf/tech_report/PREPs%20Surv%20Report%201.pdf
22. Biener L, Bogen K. PREPs Surveillance: Summary of Cognitive Interviews and Recommendations for PREPs Surveillance Measures. 2007, Accessed 7/1/08., http://www.csr.umb.edu/pdf/tech_report/PREPs%20Surv%20Report%202.pdf
23. Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design 2005, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
24. Hund LM, Farrelly MC, Allen JA, Chou RH, St Claire AW, Vallone DM, Healton CG. Findings and implications from a national study on potential reduced exposure products (PREPs). Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2006, 8(6):791-797.
25. Hamilton WL, diStefano Norton G, Ouellette TK, Rhodes WL, Kling R, Connolly GN. Smokers' responses to advertisements for regular and light cigarettes and potential reduced-exposure tobacco products. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 2004, 6(Supplement 3):S353-S362. 10.1080/14622200412331320752, 15799598.
26. Parascandola M, Hurd A, Augustson E. Consumer Awareness and Attitudes Related to New Potential Reduced-Exposure Tobacco Products. Am J Health Behav 2008, 32(4):431-437.
27. Kozlowski LT, Goldberg ME, Yost BA, White EL, Sweeney CT, Pillitteri JL. Smokers' misperceptions of light and ultra-light cigarettes may keep them smoking. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1998, 15(1):9-16. 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00004-X, 9651633.
28. RJ Reynolds' Snus Goes National Convenience Store News 2008, , http://www.csnews.com/csn/cat_management/tobacco/article_display.jsp?vnu